Supreme Court to rule on gay marriage and doma

[novasteve]

Breaking. They're going to take the case

 

[Luissa]

Which means DOMA will be struck down.

 

[novasteve]

Probably given Roberts has proven he's a libturd

 

[Luissa]

No, Roberts has proven he understands what is Constitutional and what is not.

 

[novasteve]

Not really. By his logic if the government mandate you buy paint or else pay a tax then the government can tell Home Depot what paint they can offer and at what cost and that women don't have to pay for pink paint

 

[JoeB131]

This is interesting.

DOMA will probably be struck down. It was pretty much like the "flag burning" amendments. Congress knew it was unconstitutional when they passed it, the only amazing thing was that it took this long for a court challenge to work its way through the courts.

Full Faith and Credit Clause. If one state recongizes gay marriage, the other 49 have to recognize marriages performed there, and so do the Feds.

Perry v. Hollingsworth is the more interesting case, because I really do think that Judge Walker overstepped his bounds by finding a right to gay marriage in the 14th Amendment (the one stop shop for Judges who like to legislate from the bench.) Even the 9th Circuit, notoriously liberal, had to reel him in a bit, limiting his finding to just California.

 

[novasteve]

This is interesting.

DOMA will probably be struck down. It was pretty much like the "flag burning" amendments. Congress knew it was unconstitutional when they passed it, the only amazing thing was that it took this long for a court challenge to work its way through the courts.

Full Faith and Credit Clause. If one state recongizes gay marriage, the other 49 have to recognize marriages performed there, and so do the Feds.

Perry v. Hollingsworth is the more interesting case, because I really do think that Judge Walker overstepped his bounds by finding a right to gay marriage in the 14th Amendment (the one stop shop for Judges who like to legislate from the bench.) Even the 9th Circuit, notoriously liberal, had to reel him in a bit, limiting his finding to just California.

Same with CCW permits sand full faith?

 

[JoeB131]

[


Same with CCW permits sand full faith?

No, not even close.

 

[novasteve]

[


Same with CCW permits sand full faith?

No, not even close.

Gun rights are explicit in the constitution, m arriage let alone gay marriage is not. So the case for CCW permits and FFC is even stronger.

 

[rdean]

These right wingers hate the gays the most.

Or do they?

There are so many groups they hate, it's hard to keep track. In fact, it's probably easier to say they hate everyone not white, American Christian and ignorant.

 

[novasteve]

These right wingers hate the gays the most.

Or do they?

There are so many groups they hate, it's hard to keep track. In fact, it's probably easier to say they hate everyone not white, American Christian and ignorant.

Yes, Jews like me hate everyone non white, american christian, etc...

Do you ever tire of calling everyone who doesn't share your narrow views a bigot?

You libs are the most intolerant and closed minded people on earth. YOu ban EVERYTHING you dont approve of, and that impacts far more people.

 

[JoeB131]

[


Same with CCW permits sand full faith?

No, not even close.

Gun rights are explicit in the constitution, m arriage let alone gay marriage is not. So the case for CCW permits and FFC is even stronger.

No, they aren't. In fact, quite the reverse, for most of our history, the right of the government to regulate gun ownership was a given.

 

[Katzndogz]

No, not even close.

Gun rights are explicit in the constitution, m arriage let alone gay marriage is not. So the case for CCW permits and FFC is even stronger.

No, they aren't. In fact, quite the reverse, for most of our history, the right of the government to regulate gun ownership was a given.

Link?

 

[novasteve]

if it's okay to regulate guns and require photo IDs to buy guns, despite being a constitutional right, why is doing the same for voting racist?

 

[JoeB131]

Gun rights are explicit in the constitution, m arriage let alone gay marriage is not. So the case for CCW permits and FFC is even stronger.

No, they aren't. In fact, quite the reverse, for most of our history, the right of the government to regulate gun ownership was a given.

Link?

Google it yourself.

You can start with "US vs. Miller".

 

[JoeB131]

if it's okay to regulate guns and require photo IDs to buy guns, despite being a constitutional right, why is doing the same for voting racist?

There's no "constitutional right" to a gun. The 2nd Amendment is about militias.

There is a constitutational right to vote. Enshrined in the 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments.

Maybe if you conservatards gave people of color a reason to vote for you instead of coming up with failed schemes to keep them from voting, you'd make some progress...

Just sayin'.

 

[Luissa]

These right wingers hate the gays the most.

Or do they?

There are so many groups they hate, it's hard to keep track. In fact, it's probably easier to say they hate everyone not white, American Christian and ignorant.

Yes, Jews like me hate everyone non white, american christian, etc...

Do you ever tire of calling everyone who doesn't share your narrow views a bigot?

You libs are the most intolerant and closed minded people on earth. YOu ban EVERYTHING you dont approve of, and that impacts far more people.

You are a bigot though, and an idiot.

 

[Katzndogz]

if it's okay to regulate guns and require photo IDs to buy guns, despite being a constitutional right, why is doing the same for voting racist?

There's no "constitutional right" to a gun. The 2nd Amendment is about militias.

There is a constitutational right to vote. Enshrined in the 15th, 19th, 24th and 26th Amendments.

Maybe if you conservatards gave people of color a reason to vote for you instead of coming up with failed schemes to keep them from voting, you'd make some progress...

Just sayin'.

Conservatives can't outpromise the democrats. Not until we get down to human sacrifice.

The 2nd Amendment is the right of the individual to have private weaponry. Democrats should make a big grab for those weapons and see how it works out.

 

[JoeB131]

Conservatives can't outpromise the democrats. Not until we get down to human sacrifice.

The 2nd Amendment is the right of the individual to have private weaponry. Democrats should make a big grab for those weapons and see how it works out.

Hey,maybe you should ask Right Wing Hero David Koresh how well that works out...

Heh, heh, heh....

 

[Katzndogz]

David Koresh was a cultist who killed his own people. Very much like obama.