Supreme Court to hear Texas redistricting case.

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by RetiredGySgt, Dec 10, 2011.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,551
    Thanks Received:
    5,900
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,971
  2. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,394
    ...federal judges in San Antonio "overreached and displayed judicial activism inconsistent with federal law and contrary to the intent of the Legislature."

    Uh oh.
     
  3. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,551
    Thanks Received:
    5,900
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,971
    Since there are several such actions that the Supreme Court has never found in need of addressing one can assume this case does not meet the criteria of the federal Judge stepping in.
     
  4. FA_Q2
    Offline

    FA_Q2 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    14,281
    Thanks Received:
    2,083
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +4,301
    Disgusting. Districting should be done in block shapes, not drawn around constituents to ensure one party or the other gains dominance. I can't fathom a justification in drawing a district with any other figure than population as the driver.
     
  5. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,552
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,428
    you know that's the argument they're making and not the determination of the supreme court, right?
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,551
    Thanks Received:
    5,900
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,971
    I do. And to be clear, I have no problem with Courts doing so when obvious problems exist. The problem I have is when Judges and Courts do so and maintain control for years for no real reason or a flimsy one.

    Again this is a well established procedure and just the fact the Supreme Court agreed to hear it bodes ill for the Court in question.
     

Share This Page