Supreme Court rules against DrumpF on Obama's 'Clean Water rules.' Bad water is a Red State love!

[Baz Ares]

Supreme Court rules against Trump administration on Clean Water rule
In a hit to the Trump administration, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled Monday that cases litigating the Clean Water Act should be heard by federal district courts.

The administration had argued those cases should be heard in federal appeals courts.

The Supreme Court agreed to hear the case over an Obama-era regulation, known as the Waters of the United States rule, back in January 2017, after debate as to whether the U.S. Court of Appeals or federal district courts had the authority to hear the lawsuits from industry groups and states that say the rule went too far.

Supreme Court rules against Trump administration on Clean Water rule

DOPer Red States can still vote to have all the populated waters in their states.
Really, Most river waters run down into the red states from the north. I feel the northern states should dump their
pollution up stream from them red bordering states 100 feet. So they get ALL the pollution they so truly want and
deserve in their own Stinky lands and water ways..

 

[TNHarley]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

 

[Aba Incieni]

New dem slogan: Almost Winning!

 

[Baz Ares]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

The BS Great Douche move that's allowing DOW Chemical to sell their KNOW cancer causing pesticide again, to spray on our food supplies, was another stupid move. Electing to populate, rather than protecting our nations population. This is what China does to foods. Most of this Toxic stuff also runs off into the river ways. We know why red Farming states, want to remove regulation.

 

[Aba Incieni]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

The BS Great Douche move that's allowing DOW Chemical to sell their KNOW cancer causing pesticide again, to spray on our food supplies, was another stupid move. Electing to populate, rather than protecting our nations population. This is what China does to foods. Most of this Toxic stuff also runs off into the river ways. We know why red Farming states, want to remove regulation.

The EPA called. They wondered if a few million barrels of toxic waste was enough.

 

[playtime]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

 

[playtime]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

The BS Great Douche move that's allowing DOW Chemical to sell their KNOW cancer causing pesticide again, to spray on our food supplies, was another stupid move. Electing to populate, rather than protecting our nations population. This is what China does to foods. Most of this Toxic stuff also runs off into the river ways. We know why red Farming states, want to remove regulation.

scott pruitt - head of the EPA has sued the EPA. anyone hear of a fox ever guarding the hen house?

 

[TNHarley]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Lol do you even understand what is going on? This is about who issues limitations and permits..
From reading about it, it seems environmentalists want it to be in district courts, so they can "judge shop" when they challenge anything coming from the trump admin. Thats the main beef.
But nice knee jerk

 

[Barton]

This will finish Trump for sure. Hillary preparing to move into the WH as we speak.

 

[Baz Ares]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Lol do you even understand what is going on? This is about who issues limitations and permits..
From reading about it, it seems environmentalists want it to be in district courts, so they can "judge shop" when they challenge anything coming from the trump admin. Thats the main beef.
But nice knee jerk

Environmentalists are doing great work. Protecting DOPers from themselves.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Link?

 

[playtime]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Lol do you even understand what is going on? This is about who issues limitations and permits..
From reading about it, it seems environmentalists want it to be in district courts, so they can "judge shop" when they challenge anything coming from the trump admin. Thats the main beef.
But nice knee jerk

Shown Here:
Public Law No: 115-5 (02/16/2017)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)


This joint resolution nullifies the Stream Protection Rule finalized by the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 20, 2016. The rule addresses the impacts of surface coal mining operations on surface water, groundwater, and the productivity of mining operation sites.



H.J.Res.38 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule.

 

[Baz Ares]

The DOPers idea for clean American living standards cums from China.

"People are being told to stay indoors today in Hong Kong because pollution levels are so strong."

Or more to the POINT. 3rd world... 'Don't Drink the WATERS' another MAGA bad idea.

 

[TNHarley]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Lol do you even understand what is going on? This is about who issues limitations and permits..
From reading about it, it seems environmentalists want it to be in district courts, so they can "judge shop" when they challenge anything coming from the trump admin. Thats the main beef.
But nice knee jerk

Shown Here:
Public Law No: 115-5 (02/16/2017)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)


This joint resolution nullifies the Stream Protection Rule finalized by the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 20, 2016. The rule addresses the impacts of surface coal mining operations on surface water, groundwater, and the productivity of mining operation sites.



H.J.Res.38 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule.

ummm ok lol

 

[playtime]

even FOX reported on it.

Trump overturns bill on coal mining debris
Published February 16, 2017

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has put the brakes on a regulation blocking coal mining debris from being dumped into nearby streams.

Trump called the regulation a "job-killing rule" before he signed a measure to overturn it. Lawmakers from coal-mining states stood close by, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va.

Several coal miners and energy company executives also attended the White House signing ceremony.

Republicans and some Democrats argued that the rule could eliminate thousands of coal-related jobs. They said the rule also ignored dozens of existing federal, state and local regulations.

The Interior Department said in December when it announced the rule that 6,000 miles of streams and 52,000 acres of forests would be protected.

Trump overturns bill on coal mining debris

 

[playtime]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Lol do you even understand what is going on? This is about who issues limitations and permits..
From reading about it, it seems environmentalists want it to be in district courts, so they can "judge shop" when they challenge anything coming from the trump admin. Thats the main beef.
But nice knee jerk

Shown Here:
Public Law No: 115-5 (02/16/2017)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)


This joint resolution nullifies the Stream Protection Rule finalized by the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 20, 2016. The rule addresses the impacts of surface coal mining operations on surface water, groundwater, and the productivity of mining operation sites.



H.J.Res.38 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule.

ummm ok lol

what's the matter TN? can't read & comprehend?

 

[TNHarley]

even FOX reported on it.

Trump overturns bill on coal mining debris
Published February 16, 2017

WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump has put the brakes on a regulation blocking coal mining debris from being dumped into nearby streams.

Trump called the regulation a "job-killing rule" before he signed a measure to overturn it. Lawmakers from coal-mining states stood close by, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. and Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va.

Several coal miners and energy company executives also attended the White House signing ceremony.

Republicans and some Democrats argued that the rule could eliminate thousands of coal-related jobs. They said the rule also ignored dozens of existing federal, state and local regulations.

The Interior Department said in December when it announced the rule that 6,000 miles of streams and 52,000 acres of forests would be protected.

Trump overturns bill on coal mining debris

I dont guess you bothered to read what that regulation was, either. HINT : It was about permits and their locations
It didnt stop people from dumping debri...

 

[Baz Ares]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Link?

Did President Trump Make It Legal to Dump Coal Mining Waste Into Streams?

Obama made is harder to freely pollute streams forward in 2016.
The Great Douche makes easier to keep polluting in the 1983 established ways again.

The Great Douche stands for.............................. Toxic Waste MAGA!

"As if there were not enough pesticides in our food thanks to Monsanto and chemical companies,
The Great Toxic Orange Douche recently brushed shoulders with Dow Chemical ...
so they can Pollute MORE, and MORE! Another MAGA moment in history"

 

[TNHarley]

yea, he lost BIGLY
However, the lawsuits are nearly moot. In June 2017, the EPA took the first formal step to uphold President Trump's campaign promise to repeal and replace the 2015 regulation.
Lol

why would you laugh that coal mines' toxic ash is now allowed to be dumped in waterways?

Lol do you even understand what is going on? This is about who issues limitations and permits..
From reading about it, it seems environmentalists want it to be in district courts, so they can "judge shop" when they challenge anything coming from the trump admin. Thats the main beef.
But nice knee jerk

Shown Here:
Public Law No: 115-5 (02/16/2017)

(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)


This joint resolution nullifies the Stream Protection Rule finalized by the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement on December 20, 2016. The rule addresses the impacts of surface coal mining operations on surface water, groundwater, and the productivity of mining operation sites.



H.J.Res.38 - 115th Congress (2017-2018): Disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior known as the Stream Protection Rule.

ummm ok lol

what's the matter TN? can't read & comprehend?

You said something about coal mining ash and me laughing when that wasnt even what the damn issue was, playtime.
Then, you post some shit about something else you have no idea about.
The OP had nothing to do with dumping.. Nothing.

 

[Barton]

liberalism is a brain disorder.