Supreme Court DiNozzo's Obama

[Toddsterpatriot]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

LOL just relax there will be another ice age, this is a scientific certainty unlike the faux warming hoax.

Tell that to the lobsters that are migrating for colder water (a big deal around here) and the glaciers that are disappearing. It's not a hoax, friend.

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills to get the lobsters to stay?
How many trillions more to get the glaciers to advance?

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Sureme Court declares clean air is unconstitutional....

No, they didn't, but why should that stop you from lying about it.

 

[SwimExpert]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

Your thread title is the biggest crock of horseshit since Back to the Future.

 

[WorldWatcher]

So the lower court has to take cost into account, but the SC hasn't said anything else that would impact the D.C. Circuits decision.

If there is no Stay issued, what prevents the government from implementing the requirements?

I'm just pointing out that it was a decision on the merits to the question presented to the court. From the decision "We must decide whether it was reasonable for EPA to refuse to consider cost when making this finding." - that is the question.

That's what a reversal with remanding means. The lower courts decision is voided and the case returned to them for further action consistent with the ruling.

In this case the EPA will have to reevaluate the rule and include costing as a factor. That doesn't mean the EPA is barred from implementing the rule, it just means they can no longer ignore the cost of implementation. If the EPA still attempts to implement the rule, then the petitioners will take them back to the D.C. circuit and the EPA will have to justify implementation with the inclusion of the cost factor this time.


>>>>

 

[Weatherman2020]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

I have no problem with those that fall for the environazi phoney balony paying the costs.

 

[easyt65]

Antarctic sea ice reaches a record high because of global warming

Just throwing that out there....

 

[2aguy]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

Wrong......the 18 year pause would say you are wrong......

 

[2aguy]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

LOL just relax there will be another ice age, this is a scientific certainty unlike the faux warming hoax.

Tell that to the lobsters that are migrating for colder water (a big deal around here) and the glaciers that are disappearing. It's not a hoax, friend.

Yeah....still a hoax......

 

[saveliberty]

Tell that to the lobsters that are migrating for colder water (a big deal around here) and the glaciers that are disappearing. It's not a hoax, friend.

Not a manmade problem.

 

[hangover]

'Sureme Court declares clean air is unconstitutional'

Only a die-hard Liberal 'Obamapologist' could describe the USSC ruling in such a way.

Yes, boys and girls, the USSC and the GOP hate clean air & clean water, and they are holding back the 'savior' from saving us and the world!

....like SCOTUS declaring that money is free speech. Just keep following the beast to hell...you'll love the warmth.

 

[SwimExpert]

Just keep following the beast to hell...you'll love the warmth.

What other option do we have when you liberals keep trying to shut down our global warming?

 

[OldLady]

SCOTUS overturned the EPA clean air rule, saying it puts a burden on corporations. It's money that matters.

Supreme Court overturns landmark EPA air pollution rule

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

LOL just relax there will be another ice age, this is a scientific certainty unlike the faux warming hoax.

Tell that to the lobsters that are migrating for colder water (a big deal around here) and the glaciers that are disappearing. It's not a hoax, friend.

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills to get the lobsters to stay?
How many trillions more to get the glaciers to advance?

The lobsters will go where they will, and who likes glaciers anyway? It's more about sea level and extreme weather and climate change that is going to make big changes in who lives where. My understanding is that if we don't slow it down, all this is going to happen faster than we can wrap our heads around how to deal with it. The trillions on windmills may be worth it in the end, although I have no problem with questioning what the government WANTS to spend. They do tend to inflate their wish lists.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No.....the rule of law matters.....and the myth of man made global warming is just that, a myth.......giving nameless, faceless, bureaucrats more power...did wonders for that river they polluted....and for Flint.....

Respectfully, stick to guns. Climate does change in cycles, but we are accelerating it like mad and it is NOT a made-up problem. We no longer believe the world is flat, either.

LOL just relax there will be another ice age, this is a scientific certainty unlike the faux warming hoax.

Tell that to the lobsters that are migrating for colder water (a big deal around here) and the glaciers that are disappearing. It's not a hoax, friend.

How many trillions do we need to spend on windmills to get the lobsters to stay?
How many trillions more to get the glaciers to advance?

The lobsters will go where they will, and who likes glaciers anyway? It's more about sea level and extreme weather and climate change that is going to make big changes in who lives where. My understanding is that if we don't slow it down, all this is going to happen faster than we can wrap our heads around how to deal with it. The trillions on windmills may be worth it in the end, although I have no problem with questioning what the government WANTS to spend. They do tend to inflate their wish lists.

The lobsters will go where they will,

Spending trillions won't make them stay? Why not?

and who likes glaciers anyway?

Liberal whiners, mostly.

My understanding is that if we don't slow it down,

What should we slow down? How should we slow it down?

The trillions on windmills may be worth it in the end

If the lobsters are going to leave anyway, I'd say they aren't worth it.

 

[bullwinkle]

This issue is as simple as it is aggravating: CO2 is NOT pollution, and the EPA has no power (right) to regulate it under current statutes. The fact that the Congress allowed the EPA to define CO2 has a "harmful pollutant" will go down as one of the worst cases of legislative negligence in history.

If you are not paying attention, Barry promised to destroy the American coal industry and stop the generation of electricity with coal. He has used this EPA rule change to accomplish his nefarious ends, and WE THE PEOPLE let him get away with it.

Hope and change. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Yet another reason to vote for ANYONE BUT THE DEMOCRAT in the coming Presidential election. If any Democrat is elected, we are doomed.

<<Yet another reason to vote for ANYONE BUT THE DEMOCRAT in the coming Presidential election. If any Democrat is elected, we are doomed.[/QUOTE]>> Yep! All fossils are DOOMED. But your kids will live longer healthier lives.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yo moron, I didn't make up the link.

You made up the title of the tread saying the SCOTUS declared clean air unconstitutional, they did not.
>>>>

She did the same thing on another message board.
If liberals stopped lying, we'd never heard from them.

 

[jc456]

Future generations will look back on humans from our time with disappointment. They will wonder how so many could possibly have been so ignorant. I only hope their disappointment is tempered by the knowledge that some of us tried to do the right thing.

ahhh the feel good thought of the day. LOL

 

[hangover]

This right wing forum prefers "Supreme Court DiNozzo's Obama" rather than exposing SCOTUS as the con's version of the Gestapo.

 

[SwimExpert]

This right wing forum prefers "Supreme Court DiNozzo's Obama" rather than exposing SCOTUS as the con's version of the Gestapo.

Because, the Obergefell case was all about right wing Gestapo.

 

[hangover]

Scalia paid the karma for the right wing ruling, that profits are more important than clean air. See....there is a God.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Scalia paid the karma for the right wing ruling, that profits are more important than clean air. See....there is a God.

More mindless nonsense.