Supreme Court Allows Sandy Hook Families' Case Against Remington Arms To Proceed

[Bob Blaylock]

Vegas shooter....58.

One thing that is interesting to me about the Vegas Shooter. His use of a bump stock in his crime, triggered a movement to ban bump stocks and similar accessories, but in fact, in this case, it probably saved many lives. He wasted a lot of ammunition, most of it going harmlessly over and past the crowd at which he was shooting. Anyone with a basic level of marksmanship skill, put in the same location and intent on shooting into that same crowd, not using a bump stock, and aiming each shot, would almost certainly have killed a lot more people, while having fired far fewer shots.

 

[Brain357]

The AR-15 is made to kill peoples. Remington did nothing to keep the people safe from NRA Gun Nutters when they go off.
The NRA was funded by Remington to give Guns to the mentally ill shooters irresponsibly before and after.

"product, car makers, booze makers, computer makers" Are not made to kill peoples, not the same. But all can be sued.
Gun Makers insanely have full immunity from lawsuits
for the guns, they make that are mostly all defective.

No, shitstain, they do not have immunity from lawsuits, you dumb ass. They are protected by the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act which prevents left wingers from suing them for something they didn't do........Lawfare by left wingers is evil....and car makers better watch out...since their product kills more people every single year than all guns do.

Cars are for transportation. Your argument is feeble...

and cars killed 38,000 people....AR-15s and AK-47 civilian rifles? 39. With over 18 million AR-15s in private hands....

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Lawnmowers kill more people each year than AR-15 rifles do.........70 people are killed by lawnmowers each year....39 by Ar-15s and Ak-47 rifles in 2018.....

Lawnmowers and cars need to be banned, they are both deadlier than AR-15 rifles.

So you are admitting it is the tool? Your arguments are confusing.

When was the last mass killing with a lawnmower? What was the worst?

 

[progressive hunter]

Cars killed over 38,000 people in 2017.

AR-15s and AKs......39, in 2018. Over 18 million AR-15 rifles in private hands

Car makers should be spending a lot of money helping Remington......

Cars are for transportation. Guns are for killing. How many died in the Vegas mass killing with just one shooter? Orlando? These mass killing weapons are irresponsible to sell.

Not near as many as were killed by a rental truck...

Vegas shooter....58.

Rental Truck....86.

Trucks are deadlier than guns.

Trucks are for transportation, guns are for killing. You seem triggered...

so your saying its legal to kill people with a truck,,,
what a dumbass,,,,

Not at all. I’m saying a truck is used for transportation. And by your logic has never killed anyone right? You changing your logic?

my logic remains the same,, I'm using yours against you,,,

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Blaming Gunmaker Remington For Sandy Hook Massacre

You aren’t familiar with the Supreme Court?

You are not familiar with current laws

I am pretty sure the Supreme Court is. You are in denial, sad.

You know I hope your right and this goes to the supreme court and they rule in favor for the gun manufactures just to shut to dumb asses up

See the OP idiot. They just ruled it can go forward. Are you lost?

Reread what I wrote one more time
You know I hope your right and this goes to the supreme court and they rule in favor for the gun manufactures just to shut to dumb asses up

 

[Brain357]

Vegas shooter....58.

One thing that is interesting to me about the Vegas Shooter. His use of a bump stock in his crime, triggered a movement to ban bump stocks and similar accessories, but in fact, in this case, it probably saved many lives. He wasted a lot of ammunition, most of it going harmlessly over and past the crowd at which he was shooting. Anyone with a basic level of marksmanship skill, put in the same location and intent on shooting into that same crowd, not using a bump stock, and aiming each shot, would almost certainly have killed a lot more people, while having fired far fewer shots.

Sounds like a really dangerous weapon.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

They can't be held liable if everything was done legally. They have immunity.
It would make more sense to go after the dealer who sold the weapon.

Isn't this the incident in which the shooter murdered his own mother, and took a gun belonging to her to use in his crime? It seems to me that if this is the case, even the dealer who sold the gun to the mother could not rationally be expected to have anticipated that his customer would be murdered, and the gun stolen from her and used to commit a crime.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The AR-15 is made to kill peoples. Remington did nothing to keep the people safe from NRA Gun Nutters when they go off.
The NRA was funded by Remington to give Guns to the mentally ill shooters irresponsibly before and after.

"product, car makers, booze makers, computer makers" Are not made to kill peoples, not the same. But all can be sued.
Gun Makers insanely have full immunity from lawsuits
for the guns, they make that are mostly all defective.

No, shitstain, they do not have immunity from lawsuits, you dumb ass. They are protected by the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act which prevents left wingers from suing them for something they didn't do........Lawfare by left wingers is evil....and car makers better watch out...since their product kills more people every single year than all guns do.

Cars are for transportation. Your argument is feeble...

and cars killed 38,000 people....AR-15s and AK-47 civilian rifles? 39. With over 18 million AR-15s in private hands....

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Lawnmowers kill more people each year than AR-15 rifles do.........70 people are killed by lawnmowers each year....39 by Ar-15s and Ak-47 rifles in 2018.....

Lawnmowers and cars need to be banned, they are both deadlier than AR-15 rifles.

car manufactures should be sued.

 

[Brain357]

They can't be held liable if everything was done legally. They have immunity.
It would make more sense to go after the dealer who sold the weapon.

Isn't this the incident in which the shooter murdered his own mother, and took a gun belonging to her to use in his crime? It seems to me that if this is the case, even the dealer who sold the gun to the mother could not rationally be expected to have anticipated that his customer would be murdered, and the gun stolen from her and used to commit a crime.

Manufacturer sold a weapon for mass killing to the public. Irresponsible.

 

[Brain357]

No, shitstain, they do not have immunity from lawsuits, you dumb ass. They are protected by the Lawful Commerce in Arms Act which prevents left wingers from suing them for something they didn't do........Lawfare by left wingers is evil....and car makers better watch out...since their product kills more people every single year than all guns do.

Cars are for transportation. Your argument is feeble...

and cars killed 38,000 people....AR-15s and AK-47 civilian rifles? 39. With over 18 million AR-15s in private hands....

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Lawnmowers kill more people each year than AR-15 rifles do.........70 people are killed by lawnmowers each year....39 by Ar-15s and Ak-47 rifles in 2018.....

Lawnmowers and cars need to be banned, they are both deadlier than AR-15 rifles.

car manufactures should be sued.

Cars are for transportation. Deaths are mostly accidents. Gun manufacturer is arming killers with a weapon that can kill 50+ people quickly.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

 

[Brain357]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

Cars are for transportation. Deaths are mostly accidents. Gun manufacturer is arming killers with a weapon that can kill 50+ people quickly.

 

[Brain357]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

When is mass killing lawful?

 

[TNHarley]

They can't be held liable if everything was done legally. They have immunity.
It would make more sense to go after the dealer who sold the weapon.

Isn't this the incident in which the shooter murdered his own mother, and took a gun belonging to her to use in his crime? It seems to me that if this is the case, even the dealer who sold the gun to the mother could not rationally be expected to have anticipated that his customer would be murdered, and the gun stolen from her and used to commit a crime.

But if they dug deep enough, they might could find the dealer knew the kid was nuts and sold it anyway.
I know its bullshit but it could happen.

 

[TNHarley]

They can't be held liable if everything was done legally. They have immunity.
It would make more sense to go after the dealer who sold the weapon.

Isn't this the incident in which the shooter murdered his own mother, and took a gun belonging to her to use in his crime? It seems to me that if this is the case, even the dealer who sold the gun to the mother could not rationally be expected to have anticipated that his customer would be murdered, and the gun stolen from her and used to commit a crime.

Manufacturer sold a weapon for mass killing to the public. Irresponsible.

Again, they have immunity. The gun is legal. People use them for legit reasons. Very rarely, they are abused. Like running over someone with a car. Or slitting someone's throat.

 

[progressive hunter]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

Cars are for transportation. Deaths are mostly accidents. Gun manufacturer is arming killers with a weapon that can kill 50+ people quickly.

most of those accidents are by sane sober people,,,

are you concerned about death or how they died???

 

[progressive hunter]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

When is mass killing lawful?

never,,dont be a dumbass

 

[Brain357]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

Cars are for transportation. Deaths are mostly accidents. Gun manufacturer is arming killers with a weapon that can kill 50+ people quickly.

most of those accidents are by sane sober people,,,

are you concerned about death or how they died???

Accidents are quite different than mass killing.

 

[Brain357]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

When is mass killing lawful?

never,,dont be a dumbass

Then why sell weapons for mass killing?

 

[progressive hunter]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

Cars are for transportation. Deaths are mostly accidents. Gun manufacturer is arming killers with a weapon that can kill 50+ people quickly.

most of those accidents are by sane sober people,,,

are you concerned about death or how they died???

Accidents are quite different than mass killing.

death is death,,,and no gun in history has ever committed a ,mass killing,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Again, for transportation. You can repeat yourself, but it’s still an easy counter...

Easy, but irrelevant.

Guns have lawful uses, and the overwhelmingly vast majority of guns of all types, including AR-15 and similar rifles, are only ever used for lawful purposes.

When is mass killing lawful?

never,,dont be a dumbass

Then why sell weapons for mass killing?

the only weapon ever invented for mass killings is nukes,,,