Support RAND PAULS 2nd amendment fight.....

[Ed Spacer]

DRUDGE REPORT 2012®
News & Current Events, Breaking News, Analysis, Political Commentary

Hilary **** clinton is trying to sell our rights over the UN.
SMALL ARMS TREATY.
will make it more difficult for private,law abiding citizens to protect themselves under this right as listed in the constitution.
unfortunately,lotsa GOPs are pussies with gun rights.
takes 67 senate votes to sign the second amendment away.

SUPPORT RAND PAUL,and end the weakening of our nation now!!!

 

[rightwinger]

DRUDGE REPORT 2012®
News & Current Events, Breaking News, Analysis, Political Commentary

Hilary **** clinton is trying to sell our rights over the UN.
SMALL ARMS TREATY.
will make it more difficult for private,law abiding citizens to protect themselves under this right as listed in the constitution.
unfortunately,lotsa GOPs are pussies with gun rights.
takes 67 senate votes to sign the second amendment away.

SUPPORT RAND PAUL,and the the weakening of our nation now!!!

I agree....Rand Paul will weaken the nation

 

[Decepticon]

Yes....having armed, untrained, chip-on-their-shoulder assholes on the streets sure worked out good for Trayvon Martin, huh?

Huzzah! GUNS!

WTF is it with you gun nuts and your fantasies of stopping crime with your gun?
Most shooters are taken down by UNARMED civilians.
Go ahead...use your gun like the hero you always wanted to be. You might hit some innocent bystanders, but hey, it's not like they could BLAME an untrained amateur for shooting them, right?

 

[Decepticon]

DRUDGE REPORT 2012®
News & Current Events, Breaking News, Analysis, Political Commentary

Hilary **** clinton is trying to sell our rights over the UN.
SMALL ARMS TREATY.
will make it more difficult for private,law abiding citizens to protect themselves under this right as listed in the constitution.
unfortunately,lotsa GOPs are pussies with gun rights.
takes 67 senate votes to sign the second amendment away.

SUPPORT RAND PAUL,and the the weakening of our nation now!!!

I agree....Rand Paul will weaken the nation

Rand Paul has a weak chin.
He's really not very manly at all is he? Kinda like one of them non-sexual troll dolls.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Hey nutcases,that was a typo.UN treaty takes away our constitutionally given rights to defend ourselves.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Stick to topic,i,for one,will not allow my american rights to be sold to XXXX UN globalists.

 

[Decepticon]

Stick to topic,i,for one,will not allow my american rights to be sold to XXXX UN globalists.

Enjoy your ban.

 

[Ed Spacer]

No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.

 

[Decepticon]

No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.

How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?

 

[TakeAStepBack]

CONZ!!!!!

What does the count of times in danger have to do with practicing a liberty offered by the bill of rights?

Hopefully he will never have to use those weapons in self defense. But having them, and knowing how to use them could one day save himself or his family.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Apologies for the C word use on this thread. To all. But,this makes me bitterly angry that liberal socialist scum wants to take our second amendment rights away.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Try living in any big city.....full of societal garbage.....
regardless,it is every lawabiding citizens right to have and bear arms.

 

[Peach]

No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.

How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?

DRUDGE doesn't understand no treaty can abrogate the Constitution?

 

[Decepticon]

CONZ!!!!!

What does the count of times in danger have to do with practicing a liberty offered by the bill of rights?

Hopefully he will never have to use those weapons in self defense. But having them, and knowing how to use them could one day save himself or his family.

I'm trying to determine his response level to his threat level.


But kudos to you for IMMEDIATELY making this about the right to own guns, which I didn't even mention or even imply. It's really nice to see you know what a strawman is. Too bad you applied it so clumsily with your hamfist and I set the thing afire before you could try and pin it on me.

Now tell me, was invading Iraq the proper response to 9-11? No it wasn't. Perhaps this poster is reasoning along similar lines. All I'm trying to do is find out WHY he's so afraid of people that he so strongly feels the need to be armed.

 

[Ed Spacer]

DDoesnt matter,peach....they are doing it,and its gotta be stopped.

 

[Decepticon]

No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.

How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?

DRUDGE doesn't understand no treaty can abrogate the Constitution?

Awww...you spoiled the surprise I was keeping!!!!

I was gonna let em REALLY set the hook!

 

[Peach]

It is an ARMS TRADE treaty, not a ban on 2nd Amendment rights:

UNODA - Towards an Arms Trade Treaty

 

[TakeAStepBack]

CONZ!!!!!

What does the count of times in danger have to do with practicing a liberty offered by the bill of rights?

Hopefully he will never have to use those weapons in self defense. But having them, and knowing how to use them could one day save himself or his family.

I'm trying to determine his response level to his threat level.

But kudos to you for IMMEDIATELY making this about the right to own guns, which I didn't even mention or even imply. It's really nice to see you know what a strawman is. Too bad you applied it so clumsily with your hamfist and I set the thing afire before you could try and pin it on me.

Now tell me, was invading Iraq the proper response to 9-11? No it wasn't. Perhaps this poster is reasoning along similar lines. All I'm trying to do is find out WHY he's so afraid of people that he so strongly feels the need to be armed.

WTF does that have to do with anything at all. You must be on some gubermint pills.

Owning guns for self defense has absolutely nothing to do with a "threat level" vs. a "response level". Did you ask if he was carrying a gun right now sitting at his computer, with the safety off?

Dude, seriously, you need to find a new topic to discuss outside politics. You're a foaming at the mouth moron. Coocoo for cocoa puffs....

WTF does the invasion of Iraq have to do with the price of a flagon of rice??

 

[M14 Shooter]

No ban. I have arms myself,to protect myself,and family. I will NOT allow that to be taken away.

How many times have you or your family been in actual danger?

Irrelevant.
And, of course, if there is no real threat of harm from criminala, then there's no way to justify limitations on the right to arms.

 

[Ed Spacer]

Dont try distracting the conversation,libslimes. I only fear god,and it is my rught,and every law abiding citizens rights to protect life,family,and property from those who intend to do harm WITHOUT QUESTION.