FireGod
Reputation *****
We are tending to agree for the most part, I was the one that projected the superior argument to the destruction of others. I again say what you believe is your right just as what others believe is their rights. There is a line though of basic human rights that to this day can not be defined by more than a handful of people at a time.I think there is a difference between weighing cultures and evaluating them strenuously based upon their treatment of other humans, and taking a further step to wipe out a particular culture.
I can say: "Islam, as it presently exists, is inferior to a culture that promotes tolerance of all faiths, the rule of law, and fair treatment of women," without deciding to go to war with Islam. Wind is relying upon the slippery slope fallacy. Recognizing that one form of behavior is superior to another, or more productive, or more humane, does NOT necessarily equate to destroying less humane cultures.
An alternative method would be, for instance, to fund programs that promote female education and economic independence in these countries, such as programs that are currently funded by the UN.
A pure democracy does not protect the rights of the minorities.I think the key is in creating democracies where the rights of the minorities are protected, and fighting theocracy, in all forms.
Unfortunately the ethnic and religion go hand in hand in the Middle East.As someone who had problems with being labeled by Christians because of her atheism, you should think twice before labeling Muslims or confusing a religion with political and enthic issues.
I thought the UK is a Monarchy ???????Would that include the UK? The UK is a theocracy.
I agree that democracy is the best way we can come up with for governing a nation and am anti-theocratic but it does exist in near harmless forms.