Super PAC supporting Ron Paul is operated by a 9/11 'truther'

daws101

Diamond Member
Jul 7, 2011
41,526
3,121
1,855
ontario,ca not canada
Open Channel - Super PAC supporting Ron Paul is operated by a 9/11 'truther'


•Franchi has supported the 9/11 Truth Movement, which supports the idea that the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, werean inside job to create a pretext for a reduction in American liberty, or at least involved a cover-up, with the World Trade Center brought down by a planned U.S. demolition, instead of terrorist-controlled airplanes. Franchi founded the Lone Lantern Society (a reference to Paul Revere indicating that foreign enemies are on American soil). The group supports "the birth of freedom and the death of the New World Order," a secretive elite that is supposedly trying to set up a world government. Lone Lantern has held street demonstrations on the 11th of every month in Chicago and elsewhere, demanding an investigation of 9/11. In New Hampshire in 2008, a video shows Franchi asking Tom Ridge, the former secretary of Homeland Security, who was campaigning for Sen. John McCain, whether Ridge would support an investigation of the "controlled demolition" of the World Trade Center. Ridge was having none of it, saying, "I just don't buy into that. That's a conspiracy theory that has no basis in fact. It's almost out of the Twilight Zone."
 
I suppose this is suppose to be one of those "guilty by association" deals?

SO, about those spon. combusting cars in the park across West St. :eusa_whistle:
 
The US govt walked guns into Mexico to to undermine the 2nd amendment - Fact.
The US govt supported AlQaida in Libya - Fact.

That the US govt had ANYTHING to do with 9/11 - Conspiracy Theory!
 
What is it about Paul that attracts truthers?
 
Oh, you know. Because he tells the truth. Something your kind try desperately, feverishly even, to keep from happening.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
I suppose this is suppose to be one of those "guilty by association" deals?

SO, about those spon. combusting cars in the park across West St. :eusa_whistle:
asked and answered btw you have no proof that it was spontaneous..
it's a ruse so you can throw out some bullshit speculation about it being a nefarious act by the men in black.
 
I suppose this is suppose to be one of those "guilty by association" deals?

SO, about those spon. combusting cars in the park across West St. :eusa_whistle:
asked and answered btw you have no proof that it was spontaneous..
it's a ruse so you can throw out some bullshit speculation about it being a nefarious act by the men in black.

You didn't answer, as per usual, at all. You threw up a website that does not even attempt to deal with the question at hand. the proof is in the eye witness testimony. But, for your type you will call them "mentally ill" or some such as an answer to that.

In the end. You can't explain so you must deny deny deny.

It was amusing for a while. Now, it's just sad and pathetic to watch re-occur. As the saying goes, you're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts.
 
Last edited:
What is it about Paul that attracts truthers?

because his policies would destroy the government.

troofers hate government.

troofers hate laws.

paulians hate government.

paulians hate laws.

paulians can't even cope with information like "you have twice the recommended amount of sodium per day". :cuckoo:

Interesting. And here I was favoring Ron because he believe in the law of the land and defends it and our liberties consistently. I guess you've been hanging out in a padded room for the last 30 years. When did you get out? :eusa_eh:
 
I suppose this is suppose to be one of those "guilty by association" deals?

SO, about those spon. combusting cars in the park across West St. :eusa_whistle:
asked and answered btw you have no proof that it was spontaneous..
it's a ruse so you can throw out some bullshit speculation about it being a nefarious act by the men in black.

You didn't answer, as per usual, at all. You threw up a website that does not even attempt to deal with the question at hand. the proof is in the eye witness testimony. But, for your type you will call them "mentally ill" or some such as an answer to that.

In the end. You can't explain so you must deny deny deny.

It was amusing for a while. Now, it's just sad and pathetic to watch re-occur. As the saying goes, you're entitled to your own oinion, but not to your own facts.
wrong again it's there :Honest question for the 911 conspiracy buffs. post#284
as everyones know eye/ear witness testimony is useless without empirical evidence to back it up.
BTW you never posted the testimony..
also how's the gay porn working out ?
as to this:"you're entitled to your own oinion, but not to your own facts."
what's "oinion" ....as to facts you presented none..
 
Last edited:
Translation: Derp.


I didn't post the testimony because you failed to address the initial question. In the end it is useless and I have far better things to do with my time than go back and forth, watching you flail around in defeat, name call and act like a fucking grade A moron. Anyway, have fun hanging around talking about an 11 year old topic that will never get resolved.

Herp a few derps for me.
 
Last edited:
Translation: Derp.


I didn't post the testimony because you failed to address the initial question. In the end it is useless and I have far beter things to do with my time than go back and forth, watching you flail around in defeat, name call and act like a fucking grade A moron. Anyway, have fun hanging around talking about an 11 year old topic that will never get resolved.

Herp a few derps for me.
dodge much ?
you making noise about an 11year old topic .....now that's funny!!!!
 
I don't need to dodge such weak intellect. You can't even manage to make sense, let alone refute information put in front of you. :yawn:

l.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top