Sure.. Conclusions all reached by trying to force insufficiently sampled GLOBAL data into a GLOBAL average that never had a prayer of being accurate. When you look at the individual LOCAL proxies -- you get a substantially bigger picture. You've been told this MANY MANY times and still don't appreciate the fraud that leads to "GLOBAL" conclusions in a era before thermometers...
Little Ice Age cold interval in West Antarctica: Evidence from borehole temperature at the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) Divide - Orsi - 2012 - Geophysical Research Letters - Wiley Online Library
Results show that WAIS Divide was colder than the last 1000-year average from 1300 to 1800 C.E. The temperature in the time period 1400–1800 C.E. was on average 0.52 ± 0.28°C colder than the last 100-year average. This amplitude is about half of that seen at Greenland Summit (GRIP). This result is consistent with the idea that the LIA was a global event, probably caused by a change in solar and volcanic forcing, and was not simply a seesaw-type redistribution of heat between the hemispheres as would be predicted by some ocean-circulation hypotheses. The difference in the magnitude of the LIA between Greenland and West Antarctica suggests that the feedbacks amplifying the radiative forcing may not operate in the same way in both regions.
