Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Freeman, Oct 3, 2010.
finally, a honest man.
Yes, the Bible is a lot more violent than the Koran, which is why we are all worried about offending all those radical fundamentalist Jews and Christians, and are free to mock Muhammad and burn Korans.
Why are you afraid of Muslims?
From the article:
One must be afraid or they are unamericam.
Both books are violent fucked up pieces of shit.
The DIFFERENCES are the religions that follow each of those books and how they are interrupted and acted upon.
So which is more violent, the books and words.....or the idiots who follow and act out?
Books are only paper and ink. As far as i can tell BOTH books are works of fiction. Fiction can be some fucked up shit ya know.
The scholar clearly stated that the koran call for "defensive behavior";
hence why propagandist show defensive behavior" as violence?
should self-defence be banned in religion?
Religion should be banned.
Defensive behavior is not AGGRESSIVE behavior. There is a difference between what is IN the koran and what its followers are DOING.
what a logic?
so because 0.0001 of followers are using violence, a religion should be banned!!!!
Again in my opinion, all religion should be banned.
Its a good thing Christ died for all of us, including you stupid fuckers, cause I sure as hell wouldn't do it.
As we've already determined in another thread, and as anyone who isn't a clueless moron already knows, Jesus Christ is good and real, and muhammed is an imaginary, goat-fucking poser.
Separate names with a comma.