Study Indicates HOMOSEXUAL ACTS Shorten Lifespan

[007]

Ahhh this hadn't occurred to me but you could be right, i'll do some checking.

You notice all has become very quite from the mariner camp since the mention of mattskrammer. Interesting...

 

[007]

I mean, pornography doesn't really have a lot to do with the sexual revolution; to conflate the natural progression of sexuality with the most iconic philanderer and sinner of United States history doesn't really do much justice to women's liberation and sexual advancements of the 20th century.

You're sure good at the goobldee gook when you want to be naked. You babbled on and said virtually nothing of substance.

Yes, Hugh Hefner did more for the "sexual revolution" than anyone else in American history. He broke the ice you might say, and many don't see what he does as porno. Now if you want to talk about porno, then you should refer to the likes of that piece of shit pig like Larry Flint and the filthy rag he publishes, then you'd be talking about pornography.

 

[OCA]

You notice all has become very quite from the mariner camp since the mention of mattskrammer. Interesting...

I checked but their addresses are way different from each other, the coincidences are stunning though.

 

[hylandrdet]

Study Indicates Homosexual Acts Shorten Lifespan

A new study by the Family Research Institute adds strong new evidence that homosexual acts lead to morbid sicknesses and early death.

Careful sifting of evidence from four separate databases support the conclusion that homosexual activities may shorten the person’s lifespan by as much as 30 years.

Obituaries in the homosexual press along with data from two large, random sexuality surveys and a comparison of tests on IV drug users and homosexuals were used. In each case, median age of death was less than 50 years for those involved in homosexuality.

One of the studies was done in Colorado and indicated that homosexuals and IV drug users are 10 times as likely to die before age 65 than the rest of the state population.

This recent study confirms evidence published by FRI in 1993. There, 6,714 obituaries from 16 U. S. homosexual journals over a 12 year span were compared to a large sampling of regular newspaper obituaries.

Median age of death for the homosexuals was less than 45, with only 2 percent surviving past 65, while the median age for the regular population was over 70 with more than 60 percent living past 65.

Causes of early death included murder, accidents and drug abuse, but primarily sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Homosexuals were 116 times more apt to be murdered, 24 times more likely to commit suicide, 18 times more apt to die in traffic accidents.

Before the "sexual revolution," only a few STDs were even identified.

Now, AIDS is only one of more that three dozen STDs commonly seen in medical centers in the larger cities.

People addicted to both homosexual and heterosexual promiscuity now travel the world to find new thrills. They return with not only AIDS, but virulent forms of hepatitis and TB, intestinal parasites, and other diseases transmitted by the exchange of blood and other body fluids.

God’s requirement of monogamous heterosexuality contains great protection against spread of disease. Sex was designed as an expression of love between a man and woman committed to each other for life.

Using sex to chase an ever growing appetite for greater thrills creates frustrations often expressed in violence. Such a struggle for satisfaction leads to abuse of the body, breaking down its normal defenses against disease.

Today there is great national concern over the effects of tobacco. Smoking only shortens life expectancy by a few years, but we discourage it by laws and high taxes.

Yet we pass laws to protect homosexual partnerships and practices and ignore the data showing the much greater medical and social risk.

God’s way is always best. We, who are Christians, must bear witness to this truth every way possible.


http://www.seafox.com/lifespan.html

One problem, before the sexual revolution?

Syphillis existed in America as early as Columbus. however, I do know where you're going with this.

C. Everett Koop (In my opinion), the greatest Surgent General of all time, testified before congress on the issue concerning health and how it pertains to sodomy.

In his testimony, he described in graphic details the potential risk of sodomy. He explained to the commission that the anus, unlike the vagina, was not naturally designed to expand to accomidate the size of the penis, therefore, the tearing of the anal tissue could result in bleeding, thus the blood exposure. Furthermore, he also added that the natural chafing of the penis, combined with the bacteria and viruses, contained within the fecal residue, that lies within the intestinal wall of the anus, makes for an easy viral or bacterial infection.

He, however, could not conclude that heterosexual relations are any safer because sodomy is being utilyzed in some heterosexual relationships.

So when in doubt, use a condom!

 

[Gem]

***Graphic Post Notice: To the Easily Offended I Apologize***
Hylandrdet,

One can state that "homosexual acts" are dangerous to homosexual men in the long run because anal sex as a heterosexual act is not "the norm," while sodomy is the main way homosexual partners "have sex."

It is unsafe and unclean whether it is done by straight or gay couples however, and all people, male or female, need to be very careful when they decide to participate in sodomy.

However, what the studies have found more in the case of homosexual couples than straight ones, is that homosexual men have a tendency to have a high number of sexual partners, and they perform sodomy with a much higher number of people than straight people earlier on, more frequently, and more often unprotected (to be crude, but straight men don't often try to have anal sex with a girl on the second date unless they are uninterested in a third!).

This is not a discovery that the homosexual community needs to be defensive about. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the anus is a dirty place, feces is teeming with living bacteria...so sticking a sensitive, thin-skinned, easily tearable organ in a sensitive, thin-skinned, easily-terrible orifice that happens to be covered in bacteria is probably not the safest activity that two people can participate in. When you increase the number of people and down play the safety procedures...the risk compunds...hence the results of the study.

While I have no problem believing the outcome of this study, I do agree with your main point...SAFE SEX is key.

 

[musicman]

Sex is supposed to be the ultimate expression of romantic love. I don't know why people have to get all shitty about it.

 

[musicman]

So, the greatest Surgeon General of all time concluded that rolling around in feces is dangerous. I'm glad THAT'S cleared up. And, all this time, we poor, backward simple folk have just been going on common sense and faith.

Help me out here, though, will you? All these brilliant, scientific types seem to be able to use the terms "sodomy" and "safe sex" in the same sentence - with a straight face, yet.

Tell me - what is the SAFE way to roll around in feces?

 

[no1tovote4]

So, the greatest Surgeon General of all time concluded that rolling around in feces is dangerous. I'm glad THAT'S cleared up. And, all this time, we poor, backward simple folk have just been going on common sense and faith.

Help me out here, though, will you? All these brilliant, scientific types seem to be able to use the terms "sodomy" and "safe sex" in the same sentence - with a straight face, yet.

Tell me - what is the SAFE way to roll around in feces?

Well I figure if you wrap it up then you don't usually get feces on it...



Can't imagine why I'd try it though. But heck, whatever turns your crank...

 

[musicman]

I would figure "not rolling around in feces" is the best way not to get feces on it. Beats all the wrapping in the world.

 

[no1tovote4]

I would figure "not rolling around in feces" is the best way not to get feces on it. Beats all the wrapping in the world.

Well yeah...

But heck if they want to do it, it is their choice. I can't see any reason to stop them.

 

[dilloduck]

Well yeah...

But heck if they want to do it, it is their choice. I can't see any reason to stop them.

Being a minority has never been a really "safe" enterprise no matter how you slice it.

 

[hylandrdet]

***Graphic Post Notice: To the Easily Offended I Apologize***
Hylandrdet,

One can state that "homosexual acts" are dangerous to homosexual men in the long run because anal sex as a heterosexual act is not "the norm," while sodomy is the main way homosexual partners "have sex."

It is unsafe and unclean whether it is done by straight or gay couples however, and all people, male or female, need to be very careful when they decide to participate in sodomy.

However, what the studies have found more in the case of homosexual couples than straight ones, is that homosexual men have a tendency to have a high number of sexual partners, and they perform sodomy with a much higher number of people than straight people earlier on, more frequently, and more often unprotected (to be crude, but straight men don't often try to have anal sex with a girl on the second date unless they are uninterested in a third!).

This is not a discovery that the homosexual community needs to be defensive about. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the anus is a dirty place, feces is teeming with living bacteria...so sticking a sensitive, thin-skinned, easily tearable organ in a sensitive, thin-skinned, easily-terrible orifice that happens to be covered in bacteria is probably not the safest activity that two people can participate in. When you increase the number of people and down play the safety procedures...the risk compunds...hence the results of the study.

While I have no problem believing the outcome of this study, I do agree with your main point...SAFE SEX is key.

Outstanding post; you're starting to understand the methods to my "madness".

 

[007]

Outstanding post; you're starting to understand the methods to my "madness".

We know you're mad, but I have yet to see any method.

Quite simply, Gem has espoused her understanding of why the homosexual lifestyle choice is more dangerous to ones health, by and whole, based off the sexual acts of homosexuals, compared to heterosexuals.

It is the arguements of those defending the perverted homosexual acts that are confusing and hard to comprehend.