study done on ID laws

You did it to yourselves.

hell you litterally did it to one of your own.

Ron Paul


Does he support these new laws?
 
Americans dont vote for cheaters.

the facts are about to hit the American people and your party will be known as the dirty party that cheats.

Pair that with your Nixon Image and then mulitiply it by 1000.


Your done

shut-up-hippie-nixon.jpg
 
People are going to refuse to get their voter ID's..
Then they are going to say that they were denied their right to vote.

You just can't make this shit up....
 
You see you can refuse to read it.

you can read it and pretend its all not true.


that wont matter


you clowns are jsut that , clowns.



Your opinion will mean nothing because you will be reduced down to the very fringe of the fringe of a broken assed party that cant get anything but the thirty percent of you who are the nutters.

most of those nutters will stop even voting because they wont be winning any election they vote in.
after a few years.


You will just go on and live your lives and be better off than you would be than if your guys won the elections.


you will drop the knife but by then it will be far too late for your party.

You are about as sharp as a bowling ball.
 
People are going to refuse to get their voter ID's..
Then they are going to say that they were denied their right to vote.

You just can't make this shit up....

And some who have ID will refuse to show it and will make the same claim.
 
People are going to refuse to get their voter ID's..
Then they are going to say that they were denied their right to vote.

You just can't make this shit up....



Choices.... its all about choices.



 
What could tighter voter ID laws mean in November? - CSMonitor.com




A study by the Associated Press found that legitimate votes have been rejected after many states passed tougher voter ID laws in order to prevent fraud.

By Mike Baker, Associated Press / July 8, 2012

I have an idea, let's eliminate ID for everything. Requiring a drivers license means that poor people can't drive, requiring an ID to cash a check prevents old people from getting Social Security. IDs also prevent minorities from owning a home, or even having a checking account. We should just trust everyone, and all banks should be required to hand out money to anyone who knows the name of the account holder.

Do you think this is a good idea, or do you see how stupid your argument is?
 
What could tighter voter ID laws mean in November? - CSMonitor.com




A study by the Associated Press found that legitimate votes have been rejected after many states passed tougher voter ID laws in order to prevent fraud.

By Mike Baker, Associated Press / July 8, 2012

I have an idea, let's eliminate ID for everything. Requiring a drivers license means that poor people can't drive, requiring an ID to cash a check prevents old people from getting Social Security. IDs also prevent minorities from owning a home, or even having a checking account. We should just trust everyone, and all banks should be required to hand out money to anyone who knows the name of the account holder.

Do you think this is a good idea, or do you see how stupid your argument is?


careful... she will tell you to stab yourself to death.
 
What could tighter voter ID laws mean in November? - CSMonitor.com




A study by the Associated Press found that legitimate votes have been rejected after many states passed tougher voter ID laws in order to prevent fraud.

By Mike Baker, Associated Press / July 8, 2012

I have an idea, let's eliminate ID for everything. Requiring a drivers license means that poor people can't drive, requiring an ID to cash a check prevents old people from getting Social Security. IDs also prevent minorities from owning a home, or even having a checking account. We should just trust everyone, and all banks should be required to hand out money to anyone who knows the name of the account holder.

Do you think this is a good idea, or do you see how stupid your argument is?


careful... she will tell you to stab yourself to death.

Maybe she will call him a lying assed piece of bloody pig shit? :dunno:
 
rejecting tens of thousands of voters to to prevent one fraudulent vote is NOT how you protect democracy



oh... so you WANT tens of thousands of fraudulent votes....... gotcha.

Show me where anywhere in the entire US in the past thirty years there has been "tens of thousands" of fraudulent votes. Or in the US taken as a whole for that matter.

You can't because there hasn't been. If there really were there would be a terrible stink about it and you would be crying for investigations. You haven't done that. I guess that is because vote fraud is so.............yesterday.

The GOP has found greener fields in suppression. It is cheaper less labor intensive and most of all it is ............LEGAL!!! In the old days you could stuff a few dozen votes in a ballot box. Now you ca suppress literally hundreds in that same ballot box and not go to jail.

As Neil Bush once said his no payback loan when stealing money from the savings and loans, "Is that a sweet deal or not?"
 

Forum List

Back
Top