Stephanie Cutter: Whoring It Up

[Listening]

Cutter: Obama's Recovery Has Been Stronger Than Reagan's, You Know - Guy Benson

I often find Team Obama's lies frustrating and galling. Not this one. The latest gem from Deputy Obama Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter -- whose very loose relationship with the truth has been well documented -- is so preposterous on its face that it doesn't even pass the laugh test:

******************

As the author says...there are just some things that go beyond stupid.

Cutter is really a whore.

 

[8537]

Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.

and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?

 

[Listening]

You figure it out.

The point is that this woman is a chronic liar. Nobody...and I mean nobody is going to swallow the idea that Obama's recovery is stronger than Reagan's.

Unless, you somehow are delusional enough to think Obama will win by a 56 state landslide.

 

[mudwhistle]

Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.

and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?

Because she's trying to say that the 25 million jobs Reagan created happened during the recovery she's talking about (and was less than Obama's), not during the recession........and I notice you guys always cut off your claims about Obama being screwed over at 2009. You don't want to see what he did after 2009.

 

[8537]

Nice attempt at avoiding my questions.

You figure it out.

Oh I did, trust me.

The point is that this woman is a chronic liar. Nobody...and I mean nobody is going to swallow the idea that Obama's recovery is stronger than Reagan's.

Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

 

[8537]

Why does the author use the end of the 2nd 1980's recession as the benchmark? It would be a more apt comparison to use the first recession that Reagan experienced, much like Obama.

and why the heck are they relying on the Household Survey to measure job creation?

Because she's trying to say that the 25 million jobs Reagan created happened during the recovery she's talking about, not during the recession

Except she's skipping right over the fact that Reagan's first recovery ended almost immediately with...another recession.

It's convenient to start the discussion with the end of his 2nd recession. fraudulent, but convenient.

 

[Mac1958]

.

People don't actually believe campaign surrogates, do they?

.

 

[Listening]

 

[Listening]

Caption this:

I hate my job ?

Is this her sister ?

That might explain the frown.

 

[8537]

Caption this:

I hate my job ?

Answer this: Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

 

[Listening]

Strike Three: Cutter Lies Again About 'Cancer' Ad - Guy Benson

Ah yes,

And there was this winner.....

**********************************

Let's review the timeline, shall we? After the Obama campaign pioneered a nasty and non-factual attack linking Mitt Romney to the death of a cancer-stricken woman, the president's officially-endorsed SuperPAC (operated by a former White House spokesman) repeated the transcendently false story in a television ad. The spot is running in swing-states as part of a $20 million buy. Despite universal criticism from media outlets and fact-checkers, the Obama campaign refused to condemn the hit, as numerous surrogates denied knowledge of -- and ducked responsibility for -- the smear. Chief among the 'don't-blame-us' crowd was Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter, who told CNN that she didn't know any specifics about the family tragedy featured in the ad. She lied. It soon emerged that she'd hosted an official campaign conference call with the woman's husband, Joe Soptic, in May -- during which he relayed the account of his wife's passing. Audio of the call, complete with Cutter thanking Soptic for sharing his story, provided open-and-shut evidence of Cutter's falsehood. On ABC News' This Week yesterday morning, host Jake Tapper confronted Cutter on this -- shall we say -- honesty disconnect:

***********************

Maybe she should look into the way she gets her information.

 

[Seawytch]

Strike Three: Cutter Lies Again About 'Cancer' Ad - Guy Benson

Ah yes,

And there was this winner.....

**********************************

Let's review the timeline, shall we? After the Obama campaign pioneered a nasty and non-factual attack linking Mitt Romney to the death of a cancer-stricken woman, the president's officially-endorsed SuperPAC (operated by a former White House spokesman) repeated the transcendently false story in a television ad. The spot is running in swing-states as part of a $20 million buy. Despite universal criticism from media outlets and fact-checkers, the Obama campaign refused to condemn the hit, as numerous surrogates denied knowledge of -- and ducked responsibility for -- the smear. Chief among the 'don't-blame-us' crowd was Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter, who told CNN that she didn't know any specifics about the family tragedy featured in the ad. She lied. It soon emerged that she'd hosted an official campaign conference call with the woman's husband, Joe Soptic, in May -- during which he relayed the account of his wife's passing. Audio of the call, complete with Cutter thanking Soptic for sharing his story, provided open-and-shut evidence of Cutter's falsehood. On ABC News' This Week yesterday morning, host Jake Tapper confronted Cutter on this -- shall we say -- honesty disconnect:

***********************

Maybe she should look into the way she gets her information.

It wasn't an Obama campaign ad. Lie right outta the gate.

 

[8537]

Strike Three: Cutter Lies Again About 'Cancer' Ad - Guy Benson

Ah yes,

And there was this winner.....

**********************************

Let's review the timeline, shall we? After the Obama campaign pioneered a nasty and non-factual attack linking Mitt Romney to the death of a cancer-stricken woman, the president's officially-endorsed SuperPAC (operated by a former White House spokesman) repeated the transcendently false story in a television ad. The spot is running in swing-states as part of a $20 million buy. Despite universal criticism from media outlets and fact-checkers, the Obama campaign refused to condemn the hit, as numerous surrogates denied knowledge of -- and ducked responsibility for -- the smear. Chief among the 'don't-blame-us' crowd was Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter, who told CNN that she didn't know any specifics about the family tragedy featured in the ad. She lied. It soon emerged that she'd hosted an official campaign conference call with the woman's husband, Joe Soptic, in May -- during which he relayed the account of his wife's passing. Audio of the call, complete with Cutter thanking Soptic for sharing his story, provided open-and-shut evidence of Cutter's falsehood. On ABC News' This Week yesterday morning, host Jake Tapper confronted Cutter on this -- shall we say -- honesty disconnect:

***********************

Maybe she should look into the way she gets her information.

Answer this: Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

 

[8537]

Strike Three: Cutter Lies Again About 'Cancer' Ad - Guy Benson

Ah yes,

And there was this winner.....

**********************************

Let's review the timeline, shall we? After the Obama campaign pioneered a nasty and non-factual attack linking Mitt Romney to the death of a cancer-stricken woman, the president's officially-endorsed SuperPAC (operated by a former White House spokesman) repeated the transcendently false story in a television ad. The spot is running in swing-states as part of a $20 million buy. Despite universal criticism from media outlets and fact-checkers, the Obama campaign refused to condemn the hit, as numerous surrogates denied knowledge of -- and ducked responsibility for -- the smear. Chief among the 'don't-blame-us' crowd was Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter, who told CNN that she didn't know any specifics about the family tragedy featured in the ad. She lied. It soon emerged that she'd hosted an official campaign conference call with the woman's husband, Joe Soptic, in May -- during which he relayed the account of his wife's passing. Audio of the call, complete with Cutter thanking Soptic for sharing his story, provided open-and-shut evidence of Cutter's falsehood. On ABC News' This Week yesterday morning, host Jake Tapper confronted Cutter on this -- shall we say -- honesty disconnect:

***********************

Maybe she should look into the way she gets her information.

It wasn't an Obama campaign ad. Lie right outta the gate.

Don't go confusing Listening with actual facts. The man's on a rant, let him rant.

 

[Mac1958]

.

I think it's a conspiracy.

I think all these partisan whackjobs belong to a big club, they all get along great. And they love to have competitions on who can say the dumbest shit without making the interviewer just burst out in laughter. When they get off the air, they do a big round of high fives in the Green Room.

At the end of the campaign, they have a real nice awards dinner at a secret location, where they hand out trophies for stuff like:

• Best Use of Hyperbole Without Giggling
• Best Avoidance of a Direct Fucking Question
• Best Invention of Facts While Screaming
• Most Sincere Invocation of Ronald Reagan
• Best Personal Insult, In Person
• Best Personal Insult, On Split Screen
• Most Frequent Per-Minute Use of the Term "War On.."
• Andy Rooney Memorial Award For Most Annoying Curmudgeon

They all get shitfaced together and thank goodness for what has become of the media.

So anyway, that's my theory.

.

 

[Care4all]

Strike Three: Cutter Lies Again About 'Cancer' Ad - Guy Benson

Ah yes,

And there was this winner.....

**********************************

Let's review the timeline, shall we? After the Obama campaign pioneered a nasty and non-factual attack linking Mitt Romney to the death of a cancer-stricken woman, the president's officially-endorsed SuperPAC (operated by a former White House spokesman) repeated the transcendently false story in a television ad. The spot is running in swing-states as part of a $20 million buy. Despite universal criticism from media outlets and fact-checkers, the Obama campaign refused to condemn the hit, as numerous surrogates denied knowledge of -- and ducked responsibility for -- the smear. Chief among the 'don't-blame-us' crowd was Obama Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutter, who told CNN that she didn't know any specifics about the family tragedy featured in the ad. She lied. It soon emerged that she'd hosted an official campaign conference call with the woman's husband, Joe Soptic, in May -- during which he relayed the account of his wife's passing. Audio of the call, complete with Cutter thanking Soptic for sharing his story, provided open-and-shut evidence of Cutter's falsehood. On ABC News' This Week yesterday morning, host Jake Tapper confronted Cutter on this -- shall we say -- honesty disconnect:

***********************

Maybe she should look into the way she gets her information.

maybe if you actually knew the law of the land you would not be so ignorant on the topic?

PACS by law can have no endorsement or cooperation with any candidate's campaign....period.

 

[Listening]

maybe if you actually knew the law of the land you would not be so ignorant on the topic?

PACS by law can have no endorsement or cooperation with any candidate's campaign....period.

This assumes she follows the law.

Sorry

You fail.

Neg Rep to follow.

 

[8537]

maybe if you actually knew the law of the land you would not be so ignorant on the topic?

PACS by law can have no endorsement or cooperation with any candidate's campaign....period.

This assumes she follows the law.

Sorry

You fail.

Neg Rep to follow.

Speaking of Fail:

Answer this: Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

 

[Listening]

maybe if you actually knew the law of the land you would not be so ignorant on the topic?

PACS by law can have no endorsement or cooperation with any candidate's campaign....period.

This assumes she follows the law.

Sorry

You fail.

Neg Rep to follow.

Speaking of Fail:

Answer this: Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

Why don't you e-mail the author and find out ?

This thread is about what a liar Cutter is. If you really want to hold up an analysis that says Obama's recovery is stronger than Reagan's be my guest.

 

[8537]

This assumes she follows the law.

Sorry

You fail.

Neg Rep to follow.

Speaking of Fail:

Answer this: Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

Why don't you e-mail the author and find out ?

Because I know the answer. I'm surmising you're too uneducated to know the answer.

This thread is about what a liar Cutter is.

I
But the claim she is a "liar" is based on false and fraudulent information. Of COURSE you believe it. That's how hacks roll.

Let's try again:
Why is the author's benchmark Reagan's 2nd recession? and why does the author use Household Survey figures to discuss job creation numbers?

Hint: the Household Survey doesn't track job creation.