States have power to nullify federal laws. Time to use it

Where does the Constitution say that overruling Congress is a judicial power?

Well, well, munchin man, better read Article III for the first time.

Article III doesn't say that, dipshit.

You see, Fakey, the Constitution is readily available online. You can't pretend like it's some obscure document that you have special knowledge of. We can easily prove your bullshit claims about it are . . . well . . . bullshit.

Article III gives original jurisdiction to SCOTUS, not fruitcakes like you.
 
Well, well, munchin man, better read Article III for the first time.

Article III doesn't say that, dipshit.

You see, Fakey, the Constitution is readily available online. You can't pretend like it's some obscure document that you have special knowledge of. We can easily prove your bullshit claims about it are . . . well . . . bullshit.

Article III gives original jurisdiction to SCOTUS, not fruitcakes like you.

Where does it say SCOTUS can strike down a law voted on by the Congress of the United States?
 
Article III doesn't say that, dipshit.

You see, Fakey, the Constitution is readily available online. You can't pretend like it's some obscure document that you have special knowledge of. We can easily prove your bullshit claims about it are . . . well . . . bullshit.

Article III gives original jurisdiction to SCOTUS, not fruitcakes like you.

Where does it say SCOTUS can strike down a law voted on by the Congress of the United States?

That you do not understand the constitutional narrative is immaterial, bripat
 
Even I and as all else can see that shooters has no point.
 
Last edited:
[

Secession is treason.

So you thing george washington was a traitor for leading the 13 colonies in their secession from england?

if he lost it would have been.

George Washington took up arms against his King. The secession itself was not treasonous, in and of itself. But seeing as the Crown did not consent and Washington lead an army against the King's armies, yes he was a traitor to the Crown. It just doesn't matter, because we won that fight and forced the Crown to concede our independence.
 
[

George Washington took up arms against his King. The secession itself was not treasonous, in and of itself. But seeing as the Crown did not consent and Washington lead an army against the King's armies, yes he was a traitor to the Crown. .

Board please note. Liberal just called George Washington a traitor!!!
 
[

George Washington took up arms against his King. The secession itself was not treasonous, in and of itself. But seeing as the Crown did not consent and Washington lead an army against the King's armies, yes he was a traitor to the Crown. .

Board please note. Liberal just called George Washington a traitor!!!

The distance between being a traitor and father of our country was not that far. All the signers of the Declaration of Independence were also considered traitors to the crown.......they all knew it
 
[

George Washington took up arms against his King. The secession itself was not treasonous, in and of itself. But seeing as the Crown did not consent and Washington lead an army against the King's armies, yes he was a traitor to the Crown. .

Board please note. Liberal just called George Washington a traitor!!!

Board please note. Wacko does not understand that GW was considered a traitor to KG III. Wacko did not take history classes, apparently.
 
George Washington took up arms against his King. The secession itself was not treasonous, in and of itself. But seeing as the Crown did not consent and Washington lead an army against the King's armies, yes he was a traitor to the Crown. .

Board please note. Liberal just called George Washington a traitor!!!

Poster, please note, it wasn't a liberal who called Washington a traitor, it was me. Further note that I said he was a traitor to the Crown. I never said he was a traitor to our country.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top