Starfucks is going to go "tits up", because they dont know how to play.

Mikeoxenormous

Diamond Member
May 6, 2015
39,623
28,553
2,915
Floor E Da
In the video, a black male walks into a Starbucks and demands a free cup of coffee. The liberal college educated barista hasnt heard of that promotion, but obliges the blackmans request at the expense of Starbucks. Now if this keeps up, either Starfucks starts charging Whitie with the losses accrued due to black people, or soon they Starbust, goes bankrupt. Should Starbust play the game, or stop the bullshit before it is too late?

 
In the video, a black male walks into a Starbucks and demands a free cup of coffee. The liberal college educated barista hasnt heard of that promotion, but obliges the blackmans request at the expense of Starbucks. Now if this keeps up, either Starfucks starts charging Whitie with the losses accrued due to black people, or soon they Starbust, goes bankrupt. Should Starbust play the game, or stop the bullshit before it is too late?



I dunno how people can drink that slop.
 
It was a Black conservative blogger that was mocking Starbucks ridiculous reaction to the event due to progressive pressure. Starbucks can only blame themselves for being so entwined in the radical left, to begin with.

I thought what this blogger did was funny and so pertinent to exposing them.
In the video, a black male walks into a Starbucks and demands a free cup of coffee. The liberal college educated barista hasnt heard of that promotion, but obliges the blackmans request at the expense of Starbucks. Now if this keeps up, either Starfucks starts charging Whitie with the losses accrued due to black people, or soon they Starbust, goes bankrupt. Should Starbust play the game, or stop the bullshit before it is too late?

 
And in the interview of the 2 arrested, they spoke out of both sides of their mouth, forgetting what they had claimed in the first minute of their interview, and then stating something different further in.
no one has proven that it was racially motivated --and can't
 
I'm undecided what Starbucks should do, haven't seen much facts to base any judgment on. I'd like to know how long were the two sitting without ordering and were any paying customers without a place to sit because of these two? If the action of the manager was defendable, then Starbucks has already caved.
 
no one has proven that it was racially motivated --and can't
White patrons have already sealed the deal.
Their detailed testimonies of not being harrassed while hanging out at that same Starbucks without buying anything is crucial to any prosecutorial effort towards racial discrimination. The question is whether the
Charges should be levied against Starbucks or against the manager who took it upon herself to discriminate on her own volition.
 
no one has proven that it was racially motivated --and can't
White patrons have already sealed the deal.
Their detailed testimonies of not being harrassed while hanging out at that same Starbucks without buying anything is crucial to any prosecutorial effort towards racial discrimination. The question is whether the
Charges should be levied against Starbucks or against the manager who took it upon herself to discriminate on her own volition.
Discrimination like what Facebook did to Diamond and Silk? Should FarceCrook face the same problem like Starfucks?

 
no one has proven that it was racially motivated --and can't
White patrons have already sealed the deal.
Their detailed testimonies of not being harrassed while hanging out at that same Starbucks without buying anything is crucial to any prosecutorial effort towards racial discrimination. The question is whether the
Charges should be levied against Starbucks or against the manager who took it upon herself to discriminate on her own volition.
Discrimination like what Facebook did to Diamond and Silk? Should FarceCrook face the same problem like Starfucks?


There is no comparison to be made here.
 

Forum List

Back
Top