Spending to Increase 55 Percent Under Obama's Plan

[ScienceRocks]

Spending to Increase 55 Percent Under Obama's Plan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spending will increase 55 percent over the next decade, if President Barack Obama's budget plan goes into effect. The finding comes from the Republican-side of the Senate Budget Committee, which notes that Obama's "Proposal Would Spend $880 Billion Over Already Projected Increases."

Here's a chart, detailing how Obama's plan would bring spending from $3.62 trillion in 2013 to $5.63 trillion in 2022:

Spending to Increase 55 Percent Under Obama's Plan | The Weekly Standard

Thanks the fuck a lot American idiot. Not only are you regelating the living hell out of our industury but you're sucking the working class dry!

FUCK YOU!

No increase in science
No increase in Infrasturcture

 

[Lakhota]

Drunk/stoned posting ain't pretty...

 

[Duped]

Drunk/stoned posting ain't pretty...

I'll take drunk, and stoned over dumb, and liberal any day!

 

[ScienceRocks]

NONE OF THIS WILL GO TO KEEPING OUR EDGE IN SCIENCE AND OUR INFRASTRUCTURE WILL TURN TO SHIT.

WHAT THE FUCK IS HE DOING WITH IT? Giving it all to the free shitters?

 

[The VOR]

Drunk/stoned posting ain't pretty...

They just get crazier by the minute, don't they. LOL.

Gotta love the nutters. They certainly are good for a laugh.

 

[Duped]

Look at the bright side Mathew - when we crash, the liberals will be in denial - so it will be much harder on them!

 

[ScienceRocks]

Drunk/stoned posting ain't pretty...

They just get crazier by the minute, don't they. LOL.

Gotta love the nutters. They certainly are good for a laugh.

Pointing out 16 trillion in debt spent on free shit and bailing out banks=nutter. LOL. WHAT a nut case you're.

 

[LoneLaugher]

Take a fucking Christmas break, will ya?

 

[ScienceRocks]

There's a big difference between using the money on infrastructure and science and this shit.

Giving out free shit
Bailing out businesses for bad judgements

Is a trade mark of Barack Obama!

 

[ScienceRocks]

“If you have been voting for politicians who promise to give you goodies at someone else's expense, then you have no right to complain when they take your money and give it to someone else, including themselves” - Thomas Sowell

 

[TheOldSchool]

Anyone else pissed off at what Obama's done to NASA?

 

[lukelk]

There's a big difference between using the money on infrastructure and science and this shit.

Giving out free shit
Bailing out businesses for bad judgements

Is a trade mark of Barack Obama!

Use your brain, you have an opposable thumb, your not a chimp. Lol this ops is nuts

 

[Lakhota]

In his Washington Post column, Charles Krauthammer claimed President Obama "killed NASA's manned space program." In fact, while Obama canceled former President George W. Bush's plan to return to the moon by 2020, several space experts say Obama's proposal positions NASA for future human exploration beyond the moon and into deep space.

More: Krauthammer Falsely Claims Obama "Killed NASA's Manned Space Program" | Research | Media Matters for America

 

[auditor0007]

Spending to Increase 55 Percent Under Obama's Plan

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Spending will increase 55 percent over the next decade, if President Barack Obama's budget plan goes into effect. The finding comes from the Republican-side of the Senate Budget Committee, which notes that Obama's "Proposal Would Spend $880 Billion Over Already Projected Increases."

Here's a chart, detailing how Obama's plan would bring spending from $3.62 trillion in 2013 to $5.63 trillion in 2022:

Spending to Increase 55 Percent Under Obama's Plan | The Weekly Standard

Thanks the fuck a lot American idiot. Not only are you regelating the living hell out of our industury but you're sucking the working class dry!

FUCK YOU!

No increase in science
No increase in Infrasturcture

Based on the projected growth in GDP, that would be a small decrease in spending as a percentage of GDP. Probably not the answer we need but certainly not the end of the world as you make it sound.