- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,331
- 18,625
- 1,915
Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Possibly. Of course, now you'll see the left want to be sure he is deported from US soil so that he cannot be tried here.Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
good point
he would be key on the arms transfer
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Possibly. Of course, now you'll see the left want to be sure he is deported from US soil so that he cannot be tried here.Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
good point
he would be key on the arms transfer
I thought the rights in the constitution were self-evident.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
What happened to us being a nation of laws?
We are a nation of laws for American citizens, aren't we? Should someone who is a foreigner and who launches a murderous terrorist attack against American citizens be considered "innocent until proven guilty"?
After all, the protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution only apply to American citizens, right? Or would you gladly offer this shithead murderer citizenship, even though he arranged to murder some of your own countrymen?
Doesn't that mean they apply to everyone?
Nope. Only American citizens.
I thought that the whole reason that we kept GTMO open was so that the terrorists wouldn't be on US soil and opening up the possibility of a fair trial for them.
Trump has brought him to DC. Why?
Agreed.Why are we still in Libya? ....
Shouldn't have been there in the first place. ....
I thought that the whole reason that we kept GTMO open was so that the terrorists wouldn't be on US soil and opening up the possibility of a fair trial for them.
Trump has brought him to DC. Why?
Special forces captured Mustafa al-Imam in libya sometime Sunday evening
US captures key militant in Benghazi attack
What happened to us being a nation of laws?
The Alt Right accuses their enemies of wanting to do what the Alt Right does when it can.Possibly. Of course, now you'll see the left want to be sure he is deported from US soil so that he cannot be tried here.Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
good point
he would be key on the arms transfer
Libya was a stable country with a strong economy. Women attended universities, and health care was provided for all citizens.Gaddafi transformed Libya from an oppressed 3rd world colony into a well functioning socialist state. However ISIL troops took control of Benghazi and nearby cities in eastern Libya and declared it to be Islamic Caliphate.
If the US got involved in the war between ISIL and Libya it should have fought on Libya's side rather than ISIL's side. Fighting on ISIL's side was America's worst military blunder since Vietnam.
We were fighting on THE WRONG FUCKING SIDE!
Furthermore, US involvement in the war was unconstitutional. Congress has the power to declare war and Congress never gave authorization for Obama to go to war against Libya. The President had authority to attack ISIL via the 2001 AUMF. He did not have the authority to attack Libya.
Another motive might be that Gaddafi had a plan for a pan-African gold-based currency. It would have replaced the petro-dollar with the gold dinar.Why are we still in Libya? ....
Shouldn't have been there in the first place. ....
True. The reason we were in Libya was to snarf up all those left-over weapon they used in order to supply the Syrian "opposition", which was basically ISIS. In other words, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama armed and allowed ISIS to flourish, during their early years.
Special forces captured Mustafa al-Imam in libya sometime Sunday evening
US captures key militant in Benghazi attack
OK, and do WHAT with him? Bring him to America to receive his Clinton Foundation Hero Award?
I thought the rights in the constitution were self-evident.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
What happened to us being a nation of laws?
We are a nation of laws for American citizens, aren't we? Should someone who is a foreigner and who launches a murderous terrorist attack against American citizens be considered "innocent until proven guilty"?
After all, the protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution only apply to American citizens, right? Or would you gladly offer this shithead murderer citizenship, even though he arranged to murder some of your own countrymen?
Doesn't that mean they apply to everyone?
Don't love how this useless troll always takes up for people who murder Americans. Personally while I think the .45 to the head is a great idea, they will probably be able to get intel from him and them kill him.Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
What happened to us being a nation of laws?
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
What happened to us being a nation of laws?