Special forces capture leader of Benghazi attack!

Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.
 
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.


good point

he would be key on the arms transfer
Possibly. Of course, now you'll see the left want to be sure he is deported from US soil so that he cannot be tried here.


weird for years and years the left has demanded that they be tried on US soil

Trump does as they ask now they are pissed

never can satisfy a leftard
 
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.

What happened to us being a nation of laws?

We are a nation of laws for American citizens, aren't we? Should someone who is a foreigner and who launches a murderous terrorist attack against American citizens be considered "innocent until proven guilty"?

After all, the protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution only apply to American citizens, right? Or would you gladly offer this shithead murderer citizenship, even though he arranged to murder some of your own countrymen?
I thought the rights in the constitution were self-evident.
Doesn't that mean they apply to everyone?


Nope. Only American citizens.

Well...it's not quite like that. It only applies to American citizens and some rights do apply to foreign nationals on American soil.
 
Why are we still in Libya? .... :dunno:

Shouldn't have been there in the first place. .... :cool:
Agreed.

Gaddafi transformed Libya from an oppressed 3rd world colony into a well functioning socialist state. However ISIL troops took control of Benghazi and nearby cities in eastern Libya and declared it to be Islamic Caliphate.

If the US got involved in the war between ISIL and Libya it should have fought on Libya's side rather than ISIL's side. Fighting on ISIL's side was America's worst military blunder since Vietnam.

We were fighting on THE WRONG FUCKING SIDE!

Furthermore, US involvement in the war was unconstitutional. Congress has the power to declare war and Congress never gave authorization for Obama to go to war against Libya. The President had authority to attack ISIL via the 2001 AUMF. He did not have the authority to attack Libya.
 
Last edited:
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.
Need to understand his connection to Clinton before we send him to his reward.


good point

he would be key on the arms transfer
Possibly. Of course, now you'll see the left want to be sure he is deported from US soil so that he cannot be tried here.
The Alt Right accuses their enemies of wanting to do what the Alt Right does when it can.
 
Gaddafi transformed Libya from an oppressed 3rd world colony into a well functioning socialist state. However ISIL troops took control of Benghazi and nearby cities in eastern Libya and declared it to be Islamic Caliphate.

If the US got involved in the war between ISIL and Libya it should have fought on Libya's side rather than ISIL's side. Fighting on ISIL's side was America's worst military blunder since Vietnam.

We were fighting on THE WRONG FUCKING SIDE!

Furthermore, US involvement in the war was unconstitutional. Congress has the power to declare war and Congress never gave authorization for Obama to go to war against Libya. The President had authority to attack ISIL via the 2001 AUMF. He did not have the authority to attack Libya.
Libya was a stable country with a strong economy. Women attended universities, and health care was provided for all citizens.

But the crazed old bat Hillary and her inner circle of screeching harpies wanted Libya attacked to further their political ambitions by being seen as war hawks.

Now Libya is ruled by warlords and the country's infrastructure has been destroyed. ..... :cool:
 
Last edited:
Why are we still in Libya? .... :dunno:

Shouldn't have been there in the first place. .... :cool:


True. The reason we were in Libya was to snarf up all those left-over weapon they used in order to supply the Syrian "opposition", which was basically ISIS. In other words, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama armed and allowed ISIS to flourish, during their early years.
Another motive might be that Gaddafi had a plan for a pan-African gold-based currency. It would have replaced the petro-dollar with the gold dinar.

He wanted gold for oil rather than U,S. fiat currency whose value is easily manipulated, like Yellen did via "quantitative easing". QE 1,2,3 & 4 devalued the US dollar and fuck the American lower and middle classes. During his campaign Trump was criticizing China for devaluing the yuan while Yellen was devaluing dollar at the same time.

BTW, what happened to Libya's 143 tons of gold after the NATO/ISIL led military coup? Does anyone know?
 
Last edited:
The gold is probably scattered in Central bank vaults from Tripoli to Benghazi to Beyda.
 
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.

What happened to us being a nation of laws?

We are a nation of laws for American citizens, aren't we? Should someone who is a foreigner and who launches a murderous terrorist attack against American citizens be considered "innocent until proven guilty"?

After all, the protections guaranteed by the United States Constitution only apply to American citizens, right? Or would you gladly offer this shithead murderer citizenship, even though he arranged to murder some of your own countrymen?
I thought the rights in the constitution were self-evident.
Doesn't that mean they apply to everyone?

The rights in the US constitution apply to other people around the globe? It's a nice thought, IDB but it isn't based in reality! The rights that we have here in the US are found in very few other places on earth.
 
Why should he be held anywhere? A 9mm bullet behind the ear by a SF member would be more than adequate for me.

What happened to us being a nation of laws?
Don't love how this useless troll always takes up for people who murder Americans. Personally while I think the .45 to the head is a great idea, they will probably be able to get intel from him and them kill him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top