Speaker With Suck Up Experience Needed

[Wry Catcher]

With so many who seem to hate our government and its employees one might expect that the questions asked above would be easy for them to answer.

I wonder, if someone says they are a conservative is simply a way for many of them to feel like they belong to something, but have no idea what a conservative is or wants?

What would a conservative government look like?

 

[Flanders]

Most oppose taxes, gun control, Obamacare, abortion, equal rights for women and minorities, including gays and lesbians, liberals and progressives and claim to be conservatives.

To Wry Catcher: You are wearing your talking points a little thin in my threads. Try posting your garbage in a thread of your own —— without camouflaging it behind your definition of what Americans are against.

So what is a conservative in the US in the 21st Century? What do they want,

To Wry Catcher: The First Amendment for starters.

Yale fail: Ivy leaguers sign 'petition' to repeal First Amendment
Published December 16, 2015

Yale fail: Ivy leaguers sign 'petition' to repeal First Amendment​

Try to grasp this. Conservatives want to stop Democrats and RINO from abolishing the US Constitution.

what do they hope to destroy?

To Wry Catcher: The parasite class to begin with. The concept of theocracy (totalitarian government) if possible.

With so many who seem to hate our government and its employees one might expect that the questions asked above would be easy for them to answer.

To Wry Catcher: They are when you understand the difference between oppressive government and limited government.

What would a conservative government look like?

To Wry Catcher: A government in the century that made Americans the greatest people in history. Certainly not a government that Socialists formed with the XVI Amendment. If parasites had their way 1913 would be the year ONE in a new universal calender although it took them a century to bury the Constitution.

National Obituaries: Death and Funeral Notices
THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
XXXXX Dead at 221 YRS​

The Constitution? What’s That?
J.D. Longstreet Monday, February 4, 2013

The Constitution?  What’s That?​

 

[Flanders]

It seems a small minority of members are dead set against all Democrats and the "establishment Republicans" This minority dominates the discussion / debate on most issues, usually echoing each other or some claimed authority.

To Wry Catcher: You cluttered up my thread with your definition of policies conservatives are against; so how about listening to the items Senator Jeff Sessions is against —— then give us a few samples of why you are for them.

​

​

 

[Agit8r]

This is not hard to understand:

Republicans more than anything want somebody who will not embarrass them on the national stage, and McCarthy’s gaffe raised doubts on that question. “Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?” he told Hannity. “But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today? Her numbers are dropping. Why? Because she’s un-trustable. But no one would have known any of that had happened . . . ”

McCarthy Withdraws from Speaker Race, Postpones Election
By Eliana Johnson, Rich Lowry & Alexis Levinson — October 8, 2015

Kevin McCarthy's House Speaker Bid -- It's Over | National Review Online​

It was Republicans who dumped McCarthy because he mentioned Hillary in relation to Benghazi. That is hardly worth mentioning until you realize that establishment Republicans want a speaker who will have his nose up Hillary’s fat ass should she become president the same way John Boehner was up to his neck in the sewer rat’s rear end. Bottom line: Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience.

Incidentally, Paul Ryan lies like a Democrat every time he talks about the TPP. I have to wonder what else he lies about. He went so far as to:​

Paul Ryan Channels Pelosi on the TPP – You Have to Pass Obamatrade to See What’s in Obamatrade
Michael Krieger | Posted Thursday Jun 11, 2015 at 3:32 pm

Paul Ryan Channels Pelosi on the TPP – You Have to Pass Obamatrade to See What’s in Obamatrade​

David Rockefeller’s Birthday Present | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Instead of giving Paul Ryan the benefit of the doubt try to imagine a speaker who starts out with revulsion and contempt for Hillary! That is what Republicans should require from the next speaker in the event the next president is Hillary Clinton. Should she get a honeymoon that lasts longer than three seconds after she is sworn in guarantees more immigrants, more United Nations, more unemployment, more betrayals, more foreign policy disasters, and a lot worse than the sewer rat did to the country.

Oh well, the Benghazi Committee still has one job that far outweighs Hillary Clinton’s importance: Find out who issued the stand down?

Even after Mute Gingrich spilled the beans, some people still believe the phony narrative. Adorable.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It seems a small minority of members are dead set against all Democrats and the "establishment Republicans" This minority dominates the discussion / debate on most issues, usually echoing each other or some claimed authority.

To Wry Catcher: You cluttered up my thread with your definition of policies conservatives are against; so how about listening to the items Senator Jeff Sessions is against —— then give us a few samples of why you are for them.

​

​

LOL, Sessions is speaking to an empty chamber. He's making allegations he can't support with credible evidence, makes the case that he is out of touch with main street Americans, and appeals only to callous conservatives, bigots, misogynists, racists and fools.

 

[Flanders]

LOL, Sessions is speaking to an empty chamber. He's making allegations he can't support with credible evidence, makes the case that he is out of touch with main street Americans, and appeals only to callous conservatives, bigots, misogynists, racists and fools.

To Wry Catcher: So exactly why do you support the items in Ryan’s omnibus bill?

give us a few samples of why you are for them.

Of course, you need not reply if you are a parasite, or if you have parasite relatives you want to come here so the welfare state can take of them instead of you doing it.

 

[Wry Catcher]

LOL, Sessions is speaking to an empty chamber. He's making allegations he can't support with credible evidence, makes the case that he is out of touch with main street Americans, and appeals only to callous conservatives, bigots, misogynists, racists and fools.

To Wry Catcher: So exactly why do you support the items in Ryan’s omnibus bill?

give us a few samples of why you are for them.

Of course, you need not reply if you are a parasite, or if you have parasite relatives you want to come here so the welfare state can take of them instead of you doing it.

FYI, i'm retired and my income puts my wife an I in the top 10% of income for all Americans, my guess is your not even close to what we have and own. So, take your arrogant ad hominem and stick up your ass.

I find the Republican ideology both callous and myopic; anyone who listens to their rhetoric and buys it demonstrates a complete lack of acute mental discrimination and of practical sense.

No where do R pols or their biddable followers consider all the parts or elements which go into policies and budgeting. The realpolitik of governing never occurs to them and this is why they and you are so cocksure of knowing the truth.

The right wing was aptly described thousands of years ago by Plato in the Allegory of the Cave.

 

[Flanders]

FYI, i'm retired and my income puts my wife an I in the top 10% of income for all Americans, my guess is your not even close to what we have and own. So, take your arrogant ad hominem and stick up your ass.

To Wry Catcher: My, my. Did I hit a little too close to home?

Excluding a military pension if you have one, how much of your “fortune” was built by tax dollars —— including a government pension(s)?

I find the Republican ideology both callous and myopic; anyone who listens to their rhetoric and buys it demonstrates a complete lack of acute mental discrimination and of practical sense.

To Wry Catcher: What an asshole you are! You are defending Republican party ideology when you defend Paul Ryan.

No where do R pols or their biddable followers consider all the parts or elements which go into policies and budgeting. The realpolitik of governing never occurs to them and this is why they and you are so cocksure of knowing the truth.

To Wry Catcher: In addition to being an asshole you are a stupid man. America's Founders understood governing a free people which you and your kind oppose. So do not use words like realpolitik when you do not know what you are talking about.

realpolitik (noun)

A usually expansionist national policy having as its sole principle advancement of the national interest.​

Realpolitik in America advances taxation for the purpose of eliminating individual liberties coupled with supporting parasites who benefit the most from income tax dollars. In plain English for halfwits like you, oppressive government does not advance the national interest. If the opposite was true, theocracies and dictatorships of every kind would be the preferred forms of government.

This will go over your head, but why do you think wealthy Democrats lead the charge for higher taxes on income? yet they become richer and richer while the poor get poorer and poorer. That fact now includes a shrinking private sector middle class.

The right wing was aptly described thousands of years ago by Plato in the Allegory of the Cave.

To Wry Catcher: Everything you say tells me that you want the government to protect the parasite class which is exactly what the welfare state does:

The people always have some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness. . . . This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector. Plato​

In your case, the government is the champion you and your kind nurse into greatness.

 

[Flanders]

Great Limbaugh audio:

Limbaugh Rips Congressional GOP Leadership for Omnibus - Is Jeff Sessions 'the Only Conservative Left in Congress?' - Breitbart

Limbaugh Rips Congressional GOP Leadership for Omnibus — Is Jeff Sessions ‘the Only Conservative Left in Congress?’
By Jeff Poor18 Dec 2015​

 

[Wry Catcher]

FYI, i'm retired and my income puts my wife an I in the top 10% of income for all Americans, my guess is your not even close to what we have and own. So, take your arrogant ad hominem and stick up your ass.

To Wry Catcher: My, my. Did I hit a little too close to home?

Excluding a military pension if you have one, how much of your “fortune” was built by tax dollars —— including a government pension(s)?

I find the Republican ideology both callous and myopic; anyone who listens to their rhetoric and buys it demonstrates a complete lack of acute mental discrimination and of practical sense.

To Wry Catcher: What an asshole you are! You are defending Republican party ideology when you defend Paul Ryan.

No where do R pols or their biddable followers consider all the parts or elements which go into policies and budgeting. The realpolitik of governing never occurs to them and this is why they and you are so cocksure of knowing the truth.

To Wry Catcher: In addition to being an asshole you are a stupid man. America's Founders understood governing a free people which you and your kind oppose. So do not use words like realpolitik when you do not know what you are talking about.

realpolitik (noun)

A usually expansionist national policy having as its sole principle advancement of the national interest.​

Realpolitik in America advances taxation for the purpose of eliminating individual liberties coupled with supporting parasites who benefit the most from income tax dollars. In plain English for halfwits like you, oppressive government does not advance the national interest. If the opposite was true, theocracies and dictatorships of every kind would be the preferred forms of government.

This will go over your head, but why do you think wealthy Democrats lead the charge for higher taxes on income? yet they become richer and richer while the poor get poorer and poorer. That fact now includes a shrinking private sector middle class.

The right wing was aptly described thousands of years ago by Plato in the Allegory of the Cave.

To Wry Catcher: Everything you say tells me that you want the government to protect the parasite class which is exactly what the welfare state does:

The people always have some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness. . . . This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector. Plato​

In your case, the government is the champion you and your kind nurse into greatness.

You're a lunatic. Nothing you posted caused me consternation, in fact everything you've posted leads me to believe you're a conspiracy nut, obsessive and compulsive. In laymen's terms a lunatic.

Continue on in your little world of fantasy, and give my regards to the founders, progressives for their time but dead for two centuries. My guess is they would be progressives today, and would reject the crazy opinions of you and the rest of the lunatic fringe.

 

[Flanders]

give my regards to the founders, progressives for their time but dead for two centuries. My guess is they would be progressives today, and would reject the crazy opinions of you and the rest of the lunatic fringe.

To Wry Catcher: Did you get them from Saul Alinsky? See #16 permalink in this thread:

I got the impression that the Alinsky pep talk on Page 9 was Hillary Rodham’s introduction to doublespeak.

Alinsky substitutes the word radicals for the word Communists. According to Alinsky the Communist were everywhere, doing wonderful things, even while the Founding Fathers were writing the Constitution. One line really got to me:

The American Radicals were in the colonies grimly forcing the addition of the Bill of Rights to our Constitution.​

Fighting For The United Nations? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
​

Is that is the same Bill of Rights you and your kind want to abolish?

It is easy to understand the reasons behind Alinsky’s con job, but only a very stupid person trying to sound intelligent would claim that America’s Founders would now champion totalitarian government. Real property Rights for everybody in their Constitution gave birth to better conditions for the most people, while today’s so-called “progressives” do the exact opposite to a free people:

The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895) ​

 

[Wry Catcher]

give my regards to the founders, progressives for their time but dead for two centuries. My guess is they would be progressives today, and would reject the crazy opinions of you and the rest of the lunatic fringe.

To Wry Catcher: Did you get them from Saul Alinsky? See #16 permalink in this thread:

I got the impression that the Alinsky pep talk on Page 9 was Hillary Rodham’s introduction to doublespeak.

Alinsky substitutes the word radicals for the word Communists. According to Alinsky the Communist were everywhere, doing wonderful things, even while the Founding Fathers were writing the Constitution. One line really got to me:

The American Radicals were in the colonies grimly forcing the addition of the Bill of Rights to our Constitution.​

Fighting For The United Nations? | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum​

Is that is the same Bill of Rights you and your kind want to abolish?

It is easy to understand the reasons behind Alinsky’s con job, but only a very stupid person trying to sound intelligent would claim that America’s Founders would now champion totalitarian government. Real property Rights for everybody in their Constitution gave birth to better conditions for the most people, while today’s so-called “progressives” do the exact opposite to a free people:

The theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property. Karl Marx (1818 – 1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820 – 1895) ​

More lunacy from the fringe ^^^

You need to seek asylum somewhere else, before the civil authorities put you into one.

 

[Flanders]

Do I need to say more than this thread’s title?

http://www.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195961_5_.jpg

 

[Flanders]

ACU: Marsha Blackburn Has Highest Score on Conservative Member Scorecard for Speaker of the House

I’d love to see a conservative woman become the next speaker. Another woman has nothing to fear from a media backlash when she bitch-slaps Typhoid Nancy into silence, while a man cannot, or will not, do it for obvious reasons.

I knew I was onto a good one before Paul Ryan showed his true colors:

"If the FCC exercises overreach, there are other entities that feel as if they can exercise overreach," Marsha Blackburn said. (AP Photo)​

http://cdn.washingtonexaminer.biz/cache/730x420-47988e72d4ea8b47b40e07c5d9bbabaa.jpg

The right to free expression is under attack, according to a leading Republican in Congress, through an incremental approach that begins with federal regulators and trickles down to the private sector.

"They begin with the end in mind, and they incrementally walk toward their end," Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn told the Washington Examiner on Monday. "We know that is how they operate.​

XXXXX​

Blackburn was referring to the Federal Communications Commission's effort to regulate Internet service providers. Over objections from its two Republican members, the agency ruled last year that those providers have no right to First Amendment protections​

Blackburn: Left is seeking 'incremental' erosion of free expression
By Rudy Takala
3/28/16 12:59 PM

Blackburn: Left is seeking 'incremental' erosion of free expression​

 

[Flanders]

Most are anti government, seem to be followers of Grover Norquist

To Wry Catcher: Hardly most!

As the National Rifle Association decides the fate of board member Grover Norquist, who is under a recall petition, a video has emerged of Norquist at a Muslim event that confirms fears the paid lobbyist is using his influence to open doors for radical Muslims on Capitol Hill.

This week, the NRA is tabulating the results of a special ballot cast in the gun-rights group’s first-ever recall of a sitting board member for ethics charges. Long-time members voted on a petition to remove Norquist from the NRA board over accusations he is an agent for the radical Muslim Brotherhood and has for decades aided and abetted its leaders, including one now imprisoned on terrorism charges.

Video shows embattled NRA director Grover Norquist as Islamist agent
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 05/05/2016 @ 9:00 pm

Video shows embattled NRA director Grover Norquist as Islamist agent​

 

[Wry Catcher]

Most are anti government, seem to be followers of Grover Norquist

To Wry Catcher: Hardly most!

As the National Rifle Association decides the fate of board member Grover Norquist, who is under a recall petition, a video has emerged of Norquist at a Muslim event that confirms fears the paid lobbyist is using his influence to open doors for radical Muslims on Capitol Hill.

This week, the NRA is tabulating the results of a special ballot cast in the gun-rights group’s first-ever recall of a sitting board member for ethics charges. Long-time members voted on a petition to remove Norquist from the NRA board over accusations he is an agent for the radical Muslim Brotherhood and has for decades aided and abetted its leaders, including one now imprisoned on terrorism charges.

Video shows embattled NRA director Grover Norquist as Islamist agent
Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 05/05/2016 @ 9:00 pm

Video shows embattled NRA director Grover Norquist as Islamist agent​

Interesting, but not convincing that most members of the NRA are not anti government, in fact the actions of the NRA board in this matter seem to offer evidence that they are conspiracy theorists and bigots, thus their membership would seem to agree. Do you?

 

[Flanders]

Interesting, but not convincing that most members of the NRA are not anti government, in fact the actions of the NRA board in this matter seem to offer evidence that they are conspiracy theorists and bigots, thus their membership would seem to agree. Do you?

To Wry Catcher: I do not accept your premise. Most, if not all, NRA members are anti-big government —— not anti-government. If they were anti-government as you imply they would be anarchists.

Incidentally, Democrats accuse Americans of being anti-immigration when a vast majority of Americans are ANTI-ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION.

 

[Flanders]

Make no mistake about where Speaker Suck-Up is coming from:

House Speaker Paul Ryan was the latest to criticize Trump’s border plans, telling the Huffington Post just this week that he would actually consider suing the billionaire businessman if he won the White House and pressed forward with that border control.

“I would sue any president that exceeds his or her powers,” Ryan said, expressing doubt that Trump’s border suggestion was legal, as Talking Points Memo wrote.

Ryan went on: “That’s a legal question that there’s a good debate about. On the broader question, are we going to exert our Article I powers and reclaim this Article I power no matter who the president is? Absolutely.”

He also said just because he endorsed Trump for president doesn’t mean that he would give him a “blank check” on power.

Paul Ryan threatens to sue Trump over immigration ban
Posted By Cheryl Chumley On 06/17/2016 @ 1:24 pm

Paul Ryan threatens to sue Trump over immigration ban​

All of the opposition to Donald Trump coming from elitists in both parties, and the media, is about stopping every attempt to eliminate the authority the United Nations exercises over our immigration policies and borders. Should the British people leave the EU Donald Trump is the worst president possible when Americans follow suit and demand that their own sovereignty be returned by passing H.R. 75.

Text of H.R. 75 (113th): American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 (Introduced version) - GovTrack.us

NOTE: Speaker Suck-Up is suddenly making a lot of noise about reining in presidential power. He never talked that way in all of the years the Chicago sewer rat was president. United Nations-loving suck-ups across the board should be reminded of another president:

Patriotism is easy to understand in America; it means looking out for yourself by looking out for your country. Calvin Coolidge​

 

[Flanders]

establishment Republicans want a speaker who will have his nose up Hillary’s fat ass should she become president the same way John Boehner was up to his neck in the sewer rat’s rear end. Bottom line: Paul Ryan is getting the nod because he has a lot of suck up experience.

Establishment Republicans found the right guy. Ryan’s nose can smell out the right Democrat ass to suck in a hurricane. Click on the link for a video:

An immigration watchdog group hopes to repeat the successful campaign that helped unseat Eric Cantor in 2014 by launching a similar ad targeting House Speaker Paul Ryan, highlighting his support for President Obama’s executive amnesty decrees, sanctuary cities for illegals and Syrian refugee resettlement programs.

The ad by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC hammers “Lyin Paul Ryan” for his leading role in negotiating a $1.1 trillion omnibus bill that fully funded Obama’s amnesty plans, sanctuary cities, and expanded refugee program.

While at the same time he was talking publicly against Syrian refugees, Ryan was working behind the scenes to round up the votes to fully fund Obama’s plans to increase the total influx of refugees from 70,000 to 85,000 this year and 100,000 next year.

New ad campaign pins Paul Ryan as pro-Muslim refugee
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 07/31/2016 @ 4:37 pm

New ad campaign pins Paul Ryan as pro-Muslim refugee​