Speak of sexual harassment, how come this wasn't major news?

TheDude

Gold Member
Oct 26, 2016
5,915
1,031
290
U.S.A. gone wild
During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.

The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.


THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the identities of the two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989.

THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.

In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.
On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment While at Harvard Law Review (Multiple Accusers)
 
"Since the change of criteria in the 1970s, grades are no longer the primary basis of selection for editors. Membership in the Harvard Law Review is offered to select Harvard law students based on first-year grades and performance in a writing competition held at the end of the first year except for twelve slots that are offered on a discretionary basis.[12][13][14] The writing competition includes two components: an edit of an unpublished article and an analysis of a recent United States Supreme Court or Court of Appeals case.[12] The writing competition submissions are graded blindly to assure anonymity.[14][15] Fourteen editors (two from each 1L section) are selected based on a combination of their first-year grades and their competition scores. Twenty editors are selected based solely on their competition scores. The remaining twelve editors are selected on a discretionary basis. According to the law review's webpage, "Some of these discretionary slots may be used to implement the Review's affirmative action policy."[12] The president of the Harvard Law Review is elected by the other editors."

Harvard Law Review - Wikipedia

Ah, OK so it's not just one editor. Elaine Kagan probably wrote Barry's application.
 
"Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989."

WTF. So it really was just a ceremonial resume padder and another fence post turtle incident
Or maybe he was removed because of the above story?

Someone has groomed for the Presidency for a really long time. Maybe Percy Sutton had it right and Prince Alaweed's adviser was behind getting Obama into Harvard
 
Secretsofthefed -propaganda with less validity than RT or press tv, or Hezbollah web page.

:lame2:

Get a hobby or something.
 
How ironic left-wing "fact checks" don't address the story in the OP.

You can twist facts and apply a measure to near anything. There are exceptions, and even a liberal can't pull a rabbit out of a hat (they get credit for generally trying). Besides, they wouldn't want to acknowledge the existence anyway. Better to sweep it under the rug while portraying Republicans as womanizers.

Guess Obama is a manizer...............How come there's no such thing as manizer? Maybe I made it up. Tell your friends, Obama is a "grab em by the cocks" manizer..
 
How ironic left-wing "fact checks" don't address the story in the OP.

You can twist facts and apply a measure to near anything. There are exceptions, and even a liberal can't pull a rabbit out of a hat (they get credit for generally trying). Besides, they wouldn't want to acknowledge the existence anyway. Better to sweep it under the rug while portraying Republicans as womanizers.

Guess Obama is a manizer...............How come there's no such thing as manizer? Maybe I made it up. Tell your friends, Obama is a "grab em by the cocks" manizer..

This will make him even more popular in certain quarters.
 
This story doesn't make sense.

The first link is to the Kansas Citian. In the article, they have two links supporting their claims. Click on the link and it takes you to claims of sexual harrassment made against Herman Caine.

There is not a single link or source supporting the allegations - they're all about Caine...fake news? satire?
 
This story doesn't make sense.

The first link is to the Kansas Citian. In the article, they have two links supporting their claims. Click on the link and it takes you to claims of sexual harrassment made against Herman Caine.

There is not a single link or source supporting the allegations - they're all about Caine...fake news? satire?

What do you mean the "story doesn't make sense"? I believe that's code for doesn't suit your bias. As for links to links to links, wouldn't be the first time a link failed or was misdirected.
 
This story doesn't make sense.

The first link is to the Kansas Citian. In the article, they have two links supporting their claims. Click on the link and it takes you to claims of sexual harrassment made against Herman Caine.

There is not a single link or source supporting the allegations - they're all about Caine...fake news? satire?

What do you mean the "story doesn't make sense"? I believe that's code for doesn't suit your bias. As for links to links to links, wouldn't be the first time a link failed or was misdirected.

If bias = looking for facts, then I'm biased.

Both links in the article take you to Herman Caine.

Can you supply any that actually provide sources for that article?
 
During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.

The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.


THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the identities of the two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989.

THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.

In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.
On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment While at Harvard Law Review (Multiple Accusers)
During Barack Obama’s tenure as the president of the Harvard Law Review in the late 1980s, at least two male student editors complained to colleagues and senior university officials about inappropriate behavior by Obama, ultimately leaving their positions at the journal, multiple sources confirm to THE KANSAS CITIAN.

The men complained of sexually suggestive behavior by Obama that made them angry and uncomfortable, the sources said, and they signed agreements with the university that gave them financial payouts to leave the journal. The agreements also included language that bars the men from talking about their departures.

In a series of comments over the past 10 days, Obama and his administration repeatedly declined to respond directly about whether he ever faced allegations of sexual harassment at the journal. They have also declined to address questions about specific reporting confirming that there were financial settlements in two cases in which men leveled complaints.


THE KANSAS CITIAN has confirmed the identities of the two male journal editors who complained about Obama but, for privacy concerns, is not publishing their names.
White House spokesman Jay Carney told THE KANSAS CITIAN the president indicated to White House staff that he was “vaguely familiar” with the charges and that the university’s general counsel had resolved the matter.

Obama was president of the Harvard Law Review from late-1988 to mid-1989.

THE KANSAS CITIAN learned of the allegations against him, and over the course of several weeks, has put together accounts of what happened by talking to a lengthy roster of former university officials, current and past students and others familiar with the workings of the journal at the time Obama was there.

In one case, THE KANSAS CITIAN has seen documentation describing the allegations and showing that the university formally resolved the matter. Both men received separation packages that were in the five-figure range.
On the details of Obama’s allegedly inappropriate behavior with the two men, THE KANSAS CITIAN has a half-dozen sources shedding light on different aspects of the complaints.

The sources — including the recollections of close associates and other documentation — describe episodes that left the men upset and offended. These incidents include conversations allegedly filled with innuendo or personal questions of a sexually suggestive nature, taking place at hotels during conferences, at other officially sanctioned journal events and at the journal’s offices. There were also descriptions of physical gestures that were not overtly sexual but that made men who experienced or witnessed them uncomfortable and that they regarded as improper in a professional relationship.

Obama Accused Of Sexual Harassment While at Harvard Law Review (Multiple Accusers)
The source you site is a blog written by a dude from Kansas City who styles himself a techno entrepeneur, has nothing but a g-mail to contact the blog site and wrote that article all by his fevered little lonesome to kick off re-election campaign season in Nov. 2011. If it were true, you better believe the media would have been all over it. They would out their grandmothers for a story like this. IF IT WERE TRUE, which it wasn't.
 
So this thread gets moved to the rubber room near instantly. But the endless Trump rapped (insert any name here) flooded the main forum for months
 
So this thread gets moved to the rubber room near instantly. But the endless Trump rapped (insert any name here) flooded the main forum for months
I never saw a Trump raped anybody thread, and it's raped, not rapped, btw.
Quit moping. I should think you guys would have learned from all those fake news bloggers out of Eastern Europe during the campaign. The article is 100% fake news.
 
So this thread gets moved to the rubber room near instantly. But the endless Trump rapped (insert any name here) flooded the main forum for months
I never saw a Trump raped anybody thread, and it's raped, not rapped, btw.
Quit moping. I should think you guys would have learned from all those fake news bloggers out of Eastern Europe during the campaign. The article is 100% fake news.
I'm not speaking to the veracity of the article just the leftist mods.
 
So this thread gets moved to the rubber room near instantly. But the endless Trump rapped (insert any name here) flooded the main forum for months
I never saw a Trump raped anybody thread, and it's raped, not rapped, btw.
Quit moping. I should think you guys would have learned from all those fake news bloggers out of Eastern Europe during the campaign. The article is 100% fake news.
I'm not speaking to the veracity of the article just the leftist mods.

Yes you are speaking to the veracity of the article if you are bitching about the thread being moved.
 

Forum List

Back
Top