Sotomayor says justices follow rule of law, not partisan politics

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by Disir, Dec 9, 2018.

  1. Disir
    Offline

    Disir Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Messages:
    18,370
    Thanks Received:
    2,832
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,162
    For more than a half hour before the audience at Duquesne University was able to stand in resounding applause Friday for the guest of honor, its members weren't allowed to stand at all.

    Those were the playful orders of a sitting United States Supreme Court justice.

    Pointing to the security around the perimeter of the A.J. Palumbo Center, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the first Latina justice in the court's history, joked that in order for her to come down into the audience and answer questions face-to-face, there should be no sudden movements.

    "They are here to try to protect me from myself," the justice said, prompting a burst of laughter. "They don't like me walking among you, but I like doing it."

    Then the 64-year-old justice circled the arena, shaking hands, hugging students and answering their questions intimately and directly -- in addition to speaking fervently about the court's purpose in such a politically divisive time.
    Sotomayor says justices follow rule of law, not partisan politics

    They don't follow partisan politics.
     
  2. Rambunctious
    Offline

    Rambunctious Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    20,525
    Thanks Received:
    3,786
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +21,304
    Sorry SOTO....not all of them....
     
  3. Disir
    Offline

    Disir Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Messages:
    18,370
    Thanks Received:
    2,832
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,162
    Well, crap. I meant to put this under the law forum.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. percysunshine
    Offline

    percysunshine Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2011
    Messages:
    22,544
    Thanks Received:
    2,737
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Sty
    Ratings:
    +12,268
    Never mind....
     
  5. Disir
    Offline

    Disir Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2011
    Messages:
    18,370
    Thanks Received:
    2,832
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +9,162
    Exactly. Oh, never mind.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. S.J.
    Offline

    S.J. Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2012
    Messages:
    34,911
    Thanks Received:
    6,904
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    So. Cal.
    Ratings:
    +32,136
    If Sotomayor followed the rule of law she wouldn't have said "the court is where laws are made". Or maybe she just doesn't know any better. In either case, she should not be on the S.C (or any other one).
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. Odium
    Offline

    Odium Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2015
    Messages:
    25,781
    Thanks Received:
    4,109
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Georgia Mountains
    Ratings:
    +23,014
    LOL yeah right.
     
  8. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball Unobtanium Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    47,367
    Thanks Received:
    9,988
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +21,138
    [​IMG]
     
  9. DGS49
    Offline

    DGS49 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2012
    Messages:
    6,593
    Thanks Received:
    1,396
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    Ratings:
    +5,898
    Well, it would be unkind to say that she is lying, but...

    There is a dramatic difference between how "one side" approaches difficult cases and how the other side does it. One side bases their rulings on what the Constitution OUGHT TO SAY, while the other side bases their decisions on what the Constitution actually does say. For better or worse, those two viewpoints are also representative of the approaches taken by, respectively, the political Left and Right.

    So they can tell themselves that they are not being "political," but in essence that is not the case.

    And i would bet a gazillion dollars to a penny that I could tell you which candidate each of the Justices voted for in the last ten presidential elections.

    Not political? Ridiculous.
     

Share This Page