Sotomayor doesn't mind getting an innocent defendant's off UNLESS...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by GHook93, Jul 1, 2009.

  1. GHook93
    Offline

    GHook93 Aristotle

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    17,919
    Thanks Received:
    3,126
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +4,930
    ...the defendant is WHITE! In this case the defendant has DNA evidence that proved his innocence, yet the racist Sotomayor denied his appeal. Let's get this straight. Unrefutable and highly dependable DNA evidence and Sotomayor decided to deny an appeal! I wonder what would have happened if the defendant wasn't white or better yet was a Latino? I have no doubt an appeal would have been ordered and the defendant would have been released from prison much sooner!

    How can even the liberals support such a blantant racists?


    Sotomayor Achilles' heel? Wrongly imprisoned man
     
  2. Nik
    Offline

    Nik Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,581
    Thanks Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +85
    And whats your evidence that she would have ruled differently if he was black or latino?
     
  3. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,750
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,751
    Imagine that, keeping an innocent man from appealing based on clerical errors.

    Its little wondewr nobody in their right mind respects the leagal profession these days.
     
  4. GHook93
    Offline

    GHook93 Aristotle

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    17,919
    Thanks Received:
    3,126
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +4,930
    What is your evidence that she won't have? :lol:

    Its obvious previous personal decisions that one can easily speculate that she would have treated the defendant differently if he was a latino or other minority!
     
  5. Nik
    Offline

    Nik Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,581
    Thanks Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +85
    Of course. You are speculating, that is, making shit up.

    The evidence that she wouldn't have is there is NO indication of race based preferences in any of her opinions. None. Zero. Zilch.
     
  6. GHook93
    Offline

    GHook93 Aristotle

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    17,919
    Thanks Received:
    3,126
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +4,930
    PLEASE!!! Many people respect the profession and we have the best legal system in the world! Most judges would have allowed the appeal in a criminal case! Especially a case with DNA evidence exconerating the man!
     
  7. GHook93
    Offline

    GHook93 Aristotle

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    17,919
    Thanks Received:
    3,126
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +4,930
    Just tell that to Ricci! Can you really state that a member if La Raza would have treated the defendant different if he was a Latino? That is the whole essense of La Raza viewing Latinos differently than Whites! See you liberals want to protect anyone who isn't on the right, even if the person discriminates against you! Amazing where the left's proirities are!:(
     
  8. Nik
    Offline

    Nik Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2009
    Messages:
    3,581
    Thanks Received:
    85
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +85
    Yes. I can state that. Some of the defendants were Latino.

    Way to set yourself up for a massive fail.
     
  9. WillowTree
    Offline

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,148
    Thanks Received:
    10,164
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,713
    ditto that! not to mention what they do in DC and to the country!
     
  10. Midnight Marauder
    Offline

    Midnight Marauder BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    12,404
    Thanks Received:
    1,876
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,876
    It's unjust to keep captured enemy combatants, foreign nationals on foreign soil, locked up with no charges, no trial, etc even though Obama and Holder have said they are going to continue that.

    But it's JUST for an exonerated man to be held? A US Citizen? Falsely accused and convicted?

    It doesn't matter the person's skin color. If he's not guilty of the crime, he should be released.
     

Share This Page