Something wrong with free market capitalism

[EdwardBaiamonte]

There's little wrong with USA’s domestic market places. I’m generally satisfied with how it operates.

100% stupid and liberal of course. Under Obama incomes are actually going down, 50 million are on food stamps, and health insurance costs 5 times more than it should. IN fact its 3 times more than socialist Europe.

Do you understand.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

This of course is a subject a liberal will lack the IQ to understand. The biggest detriment by far is an economy that is not competitive and that is exactly what liberal's will get for us when they protect our industries from competition.

A liberal simply lacks the IQ to understand, sadly.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

dear, China instantly eliminated 40% of the entire world's poverty by switching to Republican capitalism. they now have a growing middle class of 500 million best thinking people.

Simply enough for even you to understand?

simply enough to understand what?[/QUOTE]

that , China instantly eliminated 40% of the entire world's poverty by switching to Republican capitalism. they now have a growing middle class of 500 million best thinking people.

Simply enough for even you to understand?[/QUOTE]

It's not free enough.

[/QUOTE]

The USA is not free enough either!! And??????????????

 

[bripat9643]

Should Americans be allowed to opt out of laws they don't like?

They should be able to opt out of government they don't like.

Have you tried voting for a government you like?

When has anyone ever had a chance to vote on that? Furthermore, what if the majority votes for a government I don't like?

Has anyone come up with a better idea for government besides a democratic republic? Perhaps you're on the threshold of creating a new type of government, one that man has not yet thought of. So far it sounds like a dictatorship and you are the dictator, is that it?

That's like asking if anyone has come up with a better kind of venereal disease. The best government is no government.

 

[Supposn]

Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

This of course is a subject a liberal will lack the IQ to understand. The biggest detriment by far is an economy that is not competitive and that is exactly what liberal's will get for us when they protect our industries from competition.

A liberal simply lacks the IQ to understand, sadly.

 

[Supposn]

Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

This of course is a subject a liberal will lack the IQ to understand. The biggest detriment by far is an economy that is not competitive and that is exactly what liberal's will get for us when they protect our industries from competition.

A liberal simply lacks the IQ to understand, sadly.

 

[Supposn]

Edward Baiamonte, annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

google the Wikipedia article entitled Balance of trade
and refer to the paragraphs entitled
“Trade Balances' effects upon their nation’s GDP”

or refer to the discussion thread
“ Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy” .


Respectfully, Supposn

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

so we should have an international law making trade deficits illegal between countries, states, cities, and people??

See why we are positive that liberalism is based in pure ignorance?

 

[Bombur]

There are a lot of ways a market can go wrong and fail to result in something close to a perfect market. Free market ideology works when talking about removing barriers that are preventing a market from reaching a perfect (or close to) market. Markets are also only really good at producing certain types of results. They don't necessarily result in moral results or results that recognize the interests of everyone. They can also fail to address long term concerns and other hidden costs effectively.

A perfect market has a lot of dependencies beyond just freedom.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

There are a lot of ways a market can go wrong and fail to result in something close to a perfect market. Free market ideology works when talking about removing barriers that are preventing a market from reaching a perfect (or close to) market. Markets are also only really good at producing certain types of results. They don't necessarily result in moral results or results that recognize the interests of everyone. They can also fail to address long term concerns and other hidden costs effectively.

A perfect market has a lot of dependencies beyond just freedom.

dear you lack the IQ to be here as a typical liberal. Imagine how stupid you are. Communism killed 120 million very very slowly and yet your concern is with the problems of Republican capitalism which instantly eliminated 40% of the world's poverty the instant China switched to it from libcommieism.

Do you know any intelligent liberals you might invite to come here to help you out?

 

[bripat9643]

Capitalism doesn't consider them and treat them as a piece of shit.

dear, have you been to school at all in your life? China just switched to Republican capitalism and eliminated 40% of the world's poverty and prevented another 60 million from slowly starving to death??

Do you understand?

Dear, capitalism is only for best-thinking, most lucky and healthy people. Another people sucks in such system. Do you understand what it means or need to go to school?

So you'd rather have a system designed around losers?

 

[bripat9643]

There are a lot of ways a market can go wrong and fail to result in something close to a perfect market. Free market ideology works when talking about removing barriers that are preventing a market from reaching a perfect (or close to) market. Markets are also only really good at producing certain types of results. They don't necessarily result in moral results or results that recognize the interests of everyone. They can also fail to address long term concerns and other hidden costs effectively.

A perfect market has a lot of dependencies beyond just freedom.

That's government propaganda designed to justify its interference.

 

[Abishai100]

American Aristotle

When I think of Rice-A-Roni, Notre Dame football on NBC, and Netflix, I think about the incredible convenience associated with the modern flow of goods and populism rhetoric in modern American society (i.e., eBay, eTrade, Facebook, Amazon.com, etc.).

Free market capitalism definitely promotes bazaar diversification, however, it also creates general schizophrenia towards profiteerism/luxury focus.





Wall Street Kid (Video Game)

 

[Supposn]

Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

This of course is a subject a liberal will lack the IQ to understand. The biggest detriment by far is an economy that is not competitive and that is exactly what liberal's will get for us when they protect our industries from competition.

A liberal simply lacks the IQ to understand, sadly.

Edward Baiamonte, I generally do not discuss personalities but are you presuming to know what trade policies I may be more amiable to?


You obviously disagree with my statement regarding trade deficits but why have you not posted a logical argument effectively refuting my position?
I generally prefer presuming others to be intelligent.


Respectfully, Supposn

 

[Bombur]

There are a lot of ways a market can go wrong and fail to result in something close to a perfect market. Free market ideology works when talking about removing barriers that are preventing a market from reaching a perfect (or close to) market. Markets are also only really good at producing certain types of results. They don't necessarily result in moral results or results that recognize the interests of everyone. They can also fail to address long term concerns and other hidden costs effectively.

A perfect market has a lot of dependencies beyond just freedom.

That's government propaganda designed to justify its interference.

lol

 

[Igrok_]

Capitalism doesn't consider them and treat them as a piece of shit.

dear, have you been to school at all in your life? China just switched to Republican capitalism and eliminated 40% of the world's poverty and prevented another 60 million from slowly starving to death??

Do you understand?

Dear, capitalism is only for best-thinking, most lucky and healthy people. Another people sucks in such system. Do you understand what it means or need to go to school?

So you'd rather have a system designed around losers?

No, I would not.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Capitalism doesn't consider them and treat them as a piece of shit.

dear, have you been to school at all in your life? China just switched to Republican capitalism and eliminated 40% of the world's poverty and prevented another 60 million from slowly starving to death??

Do you understand?

Dear, capitalism is only for best-thinking, most lucky and healthy people. Another people sucks in such system. Do you understand what it means or need to go to school?

So you'd rather have a system designed around losers?

No, I would not.

dear, have you been to school at all in your life? China just switched to Republican capitalism and eliminated 40% of the world's poverty and prevented another 60 million from slowly starving to death??

Do you understand?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Annual trade deficits are ALWAYS an immediate detriment to their nation’s economy.

This of course is a subject a liberal will lack the IQ to understand. The biggest detriment by far is an economy that is not competitive and that is exactly what liberal's will get for us when they protect our industries from competition.

A liberal simply lacks the IQ to understand, sadly.

Edward Baiamonte, I generally do not discuss personalities but are you presuming to know what trade policies I may be more amiable to?


You obviously disagree with my statement regarding trade deficits but why have you not posted a logical argument effectively refuting my position?
I generally prefer presuming others to be intelligent.


Respectfully, Supposn

dear a trade deficit is impossible because the dollars used to buy exports must then be spent in the USA so that exports equal imports.

 

[Supposn]

Edward Baiamonte wrote:

Dear a trade deficit is impossible because the dollars used to buy exports must then be spent in the USA so that exports equal imports.[/QUOTE]


Edward Baiamonte, you apparently reside within another universe or you go through life wearing blinders.


You’re stating that the economists and statisticians are wrong?

USA has not experienced a trade deficit of goods every year of the past half century?


When you shop, you fail to perceive imported clothing, tools, hardware, electronic devices, both small electric appliances, office machines, and larger items such as stoves, refrigerators, and freezers? A majority of those products I encounter are imported goods.


Foreign entities purchase shares of our enterprises and make other investments with their U.S. dollars. We have a greater need for the direct and supporting production jobs rather than additional foreign investors.


The major difference between foreign and domestic investors is the benefits earned by foreign investments are eventually returned to foreign nations. We import vehicles and export scrap metal.


The economic differences between imported and foreign goods all occur prior to those goods arrival at USA ports of entry or to their USA producers' shipping platforms. Beyond those points and times I agree that there are no economic differences between them.


Prior to those points and times, the national benefits derived from productions are entirely to the benefits of the producing nations.


Respectfully, Supposn

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

USA has not experienced a trade deficit of goods every year of the past half century?

yes dear but
1) goods and services show no deficit.
2) despite goods deficit unemployment is only 5%
3) and that is with liberal policies that drove 40 million jobs to China and invited 20 million illegals in to compete for the remaining jobs and bid down wages

Do you understand now??