Some in the GOP support the Iran deal

Iran deal quietly picks up some GOP backers MSNBC

So, those who aren't directly under the GOP NO whip can actually speak their mind......Amazing!

Yo, you know what John McCain represents? The Elite Republican Party, sorry, but anything from MSNBC is not worth it`s weight!!!

"GTP"
b939915375c66773e39b1cc2c351cadabdd8866c9aa52494b6321c65d2c4c828.jpg
 
Iran deal quietly picks up some GOP backers MSNBC

So, those who aren't directly under the GOP NO whip can actually speak their mind......Amazing!

Yo, you know what John McCain represents? The Elite Republican Party, sorry, but anything from MSNBC is not worth it`s weight!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 47632


So you're for the little guy and you want to send hundreds of thousands of peoples sons into war?

Yo, idiot, don`t want a "Terrorist State" to get a Nuclear Bomb, who have killed and maimed many Americans who had the BALLS to defend our Nation!!! Now if you wish to be a True American? Then go and sign up, to protect our Country ****!!!

"GTP"
obama-lying.jpg
 
Iran deal quietly picks up some GOP backers MSNBC

So, those who aren't directly under the GOP NO whip can actually speak their mind......Amazing!

Yo, you know what John McCain represents? The Elite Republican Party, sorry, but anything from MSNBC is not worth it`s weight!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 47632


So you're for the little guy and you want to send hundreds of thousands of peoples sons into war?

It is easy to sit on your couch and wish for war.
 
Iran deal quietly picks up some GOP backers MSNBC

So, those who aren't directly under the GOP NO whip can actually speak their mind......Amazing!

Yo, you know what John McCain represents? The Elite Republican Party, sorry, but anything from MSNBC is not worth it`s weight!!!

"GTP"
View attachment 47632


So you're for the little guy and you want to send hundreds of thousands of peoples sons into war?

It is easy to sit on your couch and wish for war.

Yo, it takes just a smidgen of anybodies brain to see right from wrong!!! Use It wannabe brains!!!

"GTP"
19g0dq9wnp8aijpg.jpg
 
Iran will have a nuclear weapon sooner if the deal dies. But you go ahead and beat your drums of war.
 
Good, most US generals agree this is the best way to keep Iran from building an atomic weapon and the only real alternative is war where we send in 250,000 troops and outright invade this country. Losing probably 10-15,000 men. Iran's military is far stronger than Iraq's was.

And to be clear, they aren't developing a 'nuclear' weapon. They COULD soon have capability to build an atomic weapon.

The difference is huge. An atomic weapon would have a yield somewhere from .1 kilotons to 15 kilotons. An average nuclear device, a thermo-nuclear bomb, has a yield of 3,500 kilotons. The largest t-nb the US detonated was 25,000 kilotons. The largest ever, the Tsar bomb detonated by Russia, had a yield of 50,000 kilotons.

Its easy to scare people when you say "Iran will have a nuclear bomb soon". No, they won't.

And with this treaty they likely will never have an atomic weapon let alone a nuclear weapon.
 
Good, most US generals agree this is the best way to keep Iran from building an atomic weapon and the only real alternative is war where we send in 250,000 troops and outright invade this country. Losing probably 10-15,000 men. Iran's military is far stronger than Iraq's was.

And to be clear, they aren't developing a 'nuclear' weapon. They COULD soon have capability to build an atomic weapon.

The difference is huge. An atomic weapon would have a yield somewhere from .1 kilotons to 15 kilotons. An average nuclear device, a thermo-nuclear bomb, has a yield of 3,500 kilotons. The largest t-nb the US detonated was 25,000 kilotons. The largest ever, the Tsar bomb detonated by Russia, had a yield of 50,000 kilotons.

Its easy to scare people when you say "Iran will have a nuclear bomb soon". No, they won't.

And with this treaty they likely will never have an atomic weapon let alone a nuclear weapon.

It appears the bill to scuttle the Iran deal will pass, and then Obama's veto will not be overridden. As the article said, we cannot walk away from a deal that basically, the world, approved. Well, the party of NO can, but the sane part of the world knows better.

It tells an interesting story that the hardliners in Iran and the GOP agree on something.
 
Good, most US generals agree this is the best way to keep Iran from building an atomic weapon and the only real alternative is war where we send in 250,000 troops and outright invade this country. Losing probably 10-15,000 men. Iran's military is far stronger than Iraq's was.

And to be clear, they aren't developing a 'nuclear' weapon. They COULD soon have capability to build an atomic weapon.

The difference is huge. An atomic weapon would have a yield somewhere from .1 kilotons to 15 kilotons. An average nuclear device, a thermo-nuclear bomb, has a yield of 3,500 kilotons. The largest t-nb the US detonated was 25,000 kilotons. The largest ever, the Tsar bomb detonated by Russia, had a yield of 50,000 kilotons.

Its easy to scare people when you say "Iran will have a nuclear bomb soon". No, they won't.

And with this treaty they likely will never have an atomic weapon let alone a nuclear weapon.

It appears the bill to scuttle the Iran deal will pass, and then Obama's veto will not be overridden. As the article said, we cannot walk away from a deal that basically, the world, approved. Well, the party of NO can, but the sane part of the world knows better.

It tells an interesting story that the hardliners in Iran and the GOP agree on something.

Yo, when people like you are still in the World? We are all in trouble!!!


"GTP"
19g0dq9wnp8aijpg.jpg
 
Good, most US generals agree this is the best way to keep Iran from building an atomic weapon and the only real alternative is war where we send in 250,000 troops and outright invade this country. Losing probably 10-15,000 men. Iran's military is far stronger than Iraq's was.

And to be clear, they aren't developing a 'nuclear' weapon. They COULD soon have capability to build an atomic weapon.

The difference is huge. An atomic weapon would have a yield somewhere from .1 kilotons to 15 kilotons. An average nuclear device, a thermo-nuclear bomb, has a yield of 3,500 kilotons. The largest t-nb the US detonated was 25,000 kilotons. The largest ever, the Tsar bomb detonated by Russia, had a yield of 50,000 kilotons.

Its easy to scare people when you say "Iran will have a nuclear bomb soon". No, they won't.

And with this treaty they likely will never have an atomic weapon let alone a nuclear weapon.

It appears the bill to scuttle the Iran deal will pass, and then Obama's veto will not be overridden. As the article said, we cannot walk away from a deal that basically, the world, approved. Well, the party of NO can, but the sane part of the world knows better.

It tells an interesting story that the hardliners in Iran and the GOP agree on something.

The Iranian Mullahs and the GOP, what a convoluted mess of religious zealots.
 
it opens a country to our capitalist system.

the free market might create some jobs with the opportunity.

and really, it's not our fucking business if iran does get nukes, it's just a fucking moronic pile of regurgitated dog sit or a deal for the people that think it will keep iran from getting what they want
 

Forum List

Back
Top