Some Failed Climate Predictions

[abu afak]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

 

[westwall]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Clown.
`

No, they are NASA GISS. Caught multiple times faking and altering data to support their fraud. Here is the paper submitted by a German scientist where he lays out chapter and verse how GISS has been faking the data. In other words...it ain't real.


Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert hat in 36 Ländern beim Bau von 83 Talsperren beraten. Auf die Untersuchung der Felsdurchlässigkeit und die Methoden ihrer Abdichtung hat sich der Geologe spezialisiert. Genaue Messungen, präzise statistische Erhebungen waren nötig, um spätere Mängel oder gar eine Katastrophe ausschließen zu können.

Mit dieser methodischen Gründlichkeit hat er nach seiner Pensionierung begonnen, den Klimawandel zu hinterfragen. Er begann, wie im Studium gelernt die Temperaturmessungen der üblichen Warm- und Kaltphasen auszuwerten. Seit 1880 gab es schon ein weltweites Netz. Die so ermittelten Daten werden vom Goddard Institut of Space Studies (GISS) einer Abteilung der NASA verwaltet und im Internet angeboten. Von den mittlerweile 7365 Stationen liegen auswertbare Datenreihen von 1153 Stationen für die Zeit ab 1881 vor. Diese Zahlen sind auch die Grundlage, mit denen die NASA das IPCC, den sogenannten Weltklimarat beliefert. Und aus diesen öffentlich zugängigen Daten hat Ewert eine eher unglaubliche Entdeckung gemacht: Zwischen den Jahren 2010 und 2012 wurden die seit 1881 gemessenen Temperaturen massiv im Nachhinein verändert, so dass sich vor allem für den Zeitraum ab 1950 eine deutliche Klimaerwärmung ergibt, die es vorher so nicht gab.

Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?

 

[abu afak]

No, they are NASA GISS. Caught multiple times faking and altering data to support their fraud. GISS has been faking the data. Here is the paper submitted by a German scientist. In other words ... it is not real.
Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert hat in 36 Ländern beim Bau von 83 Talsperren beraten. Auf die Untersuchung der Felsdurchlässigkeit und die Methoden ihrer Abdichtung hat sich der Geologe spezialisiert. Genaue Messungen, präzise statistische Erhebungen waren nötig, um spätere Mängel oder gar eine Katastrophe ausschließen zu können.

Mit dieser methodischen Gründlichkeit hat er nach seiner Pensionierung begonnen, den Klimawandel zu hinterfragen. Er begann, wie im Studium gelernt die Temperaturmessungen der üblichen Warm- und Kaltphasen auszuwerten. Seit 1880 gab es schon ein weltweites Netz. Die so ermittelten Daten werden vom Goddard Institut of Space Studies (GISS) einer Abteilung der NASA verwaltet und im Internet angeboten. Von den mittlerweile 7365 Stationen liegen auswertbare Datenreihen von 1153 Stationen für die Zeit ab 1881 vor. Diese Zahlen sind auch die Grundlage, mit denen die NASA das IPCC, den sogenannten Weltklimarat beliefert. Und aus diesen öffentlich zugängigen Daten hat Ewert eine eher unglaubliche Entdeckung gemacht: Zwischen den Jahren 2010 und 2012 wurden die seit 1881 gemessenen Temperaturen massiv im Nachhinein verändert, so dass sich vor allem für den Zeitraum ab 1950 eine deutliche Klimaerwärmung ergibt, die es vorher so nicht gab.

Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?

NASA is credible, you're a joke.

The following Rules Apply Everywhere unless otherwise stated on USMB, including Posts, Chat Box, Private Messages, Visitor Messages, and Signatures:

• 
  
  • Please post in English. We like having Global USMB members, but the use of other languages is too often abused in order to circumvent rules.

LOL Clown.
`

 

[westwall]

[QUOTE = "westwall, post: 19807213, member: 23239"]
No, they are NASA GISS. Caught multiple times faking and altering data to support their fraud. GISS has been faking the data. Here is the paper submitted by a German scientist. In other words ... it is not real.
Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?
Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert hat in 36 Ländern beim Bau von 83 Talsperren beraten. Auf die Untersuchung der Felsdurchlässigkeit und die Methoden ihrer Abdichtung hat sich der Geologe spezialisiert. Genaue Messungen, präzise statistische Erhebungen waren nötig, um spätere Mängel oder gar eine Katastrophe ausschließen zu können.

Mit dieser methodischen Gründlichkeit hat er nach seiner Pensionierung begonnen, den Klimawandel zu hinterfragen. Er begann, wie im Studium gelernt die Temperaturmessungen der üblichen Warm- und Kaltphasen auszuwerten. Seit 1880 gab es schon ein weltweites Netz. Die so ermittelten Daten werden vom Goddard Institut of Space Studies (GISS) einer Abteilung der NASA verwaltet und im Internet angeboten. Von den mittlerweile 7365 Stationen liegen auswertbare Datenreihen von 1153 Stationen für die Zeit ab 1881 vor. Diese Zahlen sind auch die Grundlage, mit denen die NASA das IPCC, den sogenannten Weltklimarat beliefert. Und aus diesen öffentlich zugängigen Daten hat Ewert eine eher unglaubliche Entdeckung gemacht: Zwischen den Jahren 2010 und 2012 wurden die seit 1881 gemessenen Temperaturen massiv im Nachhinein verändert, so dass sich vor allem für den Zeitraum ab 1950 eine deutliche Klimaerwärmung ergibt, die es vorher so nicht gab.

Sind die Klimadaten manipuliert?

NASA is credible, you're a joke.

The following Rules Apply Everywhere unless otherwise stated on USMB, including Posts, Chat Box, Private Messages, Visitor Messages, and Signatures:

• Please post in English. We like having Global USMB members, but the use of other languages is too often abused in order to circumvent rules.

Your link is the JOKE and a rule volation

DIE ACHSE DES GUTEN. ACHGUT.COM

LOL Clown.
`[/QUOTE]







NASA is certainly credible, NASA GISS on the other hand, is a corrupt bunch of bureaucrats. They have been caught lying so many times that they rely on useful idiots, such as yourself, to push their propaganda. I left it in the native German so that you could translate using your choice of method. Were you not a troll, you would understand that.

 

[westwall]

Ahhhh, there is it. The ever popular funny emoji signifying a complete lack of facts to support your position. Your capitulation is duly noted.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

As we all know, predicting the future is always going to be difficult.
Seeing what has happened in the past, and is happening right now is a lot easier.

Here's some help for you. Clearly your research capabilities are limited.



Evolution of permafrost on the Qinghai‐Xizang (Tibet) Plateau since the end of the late Pleistocene
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2006JF000521

permafrost should be temporaryfrost

dupes should try reading...
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet ...
https://climate.nasa.gov › evidence
Vital Signs of the Planet: Global Climate Change and Global Warming. How do we know it's happening? Here's the evidence.
Global warming
Global Ice Viewer
Causes
What is happening in the ocean?
Video: Oceans of Climate ...
Earth System Science
About Us

The Most Powerful Evidence Climate Scientists Have of Global Warming ...
https://insideclimatenews.org › i...
Oct 3, 2017 · The oceans hold the story of a planet warming as fossil fuels are burned. Here is what scientists have discovered, in four charts.
Six irrefutable pieces of evidence that prove climate change is real | Popular ...
https://www.popsci.com › evide...
Mar 9, 2017 · Why it matters: Melting ice and a warming ocean mean more water and a rising sea level. Though the global sea level is also affected by short-term ...
Evidence for global warming - Skeptical ...
https://skepticalscience.com › evidence-f...

Can you please show us the data set from the oceans for 1850?

 

[skookerasbil]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Since I posted a smackdown at post #15, exposing CNM love affair with TWO RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios applying both to the ..... he he.... ha ha ha..... same ONE HADCRUT4 temperature data set, saying BOTH RCP 4.5 and 8.5 match it well.

It is clear CNM has some explaining to do........ How can BOTH very different warming scenarios fit well with the same HADCRUT4 temperature warming trend line?

 

[Sunsettommy]

In reply to post 25

You failed to address post #1, with sourced evidence of prediction/projection failures, you chose to ignore it because you have no counterpoint to offer. This is why you go into link mania to try salvaging your gross inability to address the content of post #1. It is a revealing behavior on your part to unleash a meaningless link bomb since NONE of it addresses the well documented IPCC's prediction/projection failures.

I have seem all of your links before, which YOU and them insinuate that skeptics don't accept the well documented evidence that the planet has been warming since the LIA, It is a baldfaced LIE! Skeptics like myself make clear of undeniable warming by showing the temperature charts, heck even Javier's article I posted in post #1 showed that he agrees it has been warming too.

Now you still have an opportunity to actually address post #1, that documents prediction/projection failures. Some Failed Climate Predictions is the name of the title of this thread.

Where is your counterpoint?

Waiting to see if Franco or CNM has anything to bring to the debate table...........................

 

[skookerasbil]

I hear..... crickets

 

[francoHFW]

I hear..... crickets

intelligent people get tired of trying 2 educate brainwashed functional morons who are proud of it.

 

[francoHFW]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and no it is not a conspiracy, conspiracy nut job.

 

[Sunsettommy]

I hear..... crickets

intelligent people get tired of trying 2 educate brainwashed functional morons who are proud of it.

Intelligent people would try at least one counterpoint to post #1, which you STILL avoid doing.

It is clear you can't address the documented IPCC prediction/projection failures.

Cheers.

 

[Sunsettommy]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and no it is not a conspiracy, conspiracy nut job.

I think you are scared of documented reality that this warming period since the late 1970's is no different from other warming periods back to the 1800's, since you keep avoiding it every time it is brought up.

 

[francoHFW]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and no it is not a conspiracy, conspiracy nut job.

I think you are scared of documented reality that this warming period since the late 1970's is no different from other warming periods back to the 1800's, since you keep avoiding it every time it is brought up.

I think I will go with every scientist in the world who is not bought off, thanks.

 

[westwall]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and no it is not a conspiracy, conspiracy nut job.

I think you are scared of documented reality that this warming period since the late 1970's is no different from other warming periods back to the 1800's, since you keep avoiding it every time it is brought up.

I think I will go with every scientist in the world who is not bought off, thanks.

You mean the scientists who need to push government into mandating laws that will force the taxpayers of the world to fork over 76 trillion dollars to rebuild the energy dispersion system of the world....and those scientists all get a nice cut of that huge rip off. Those bought off scientists?

 

[Sunsettommy]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and no it is not a conspiracy, conspiracy nut job.

I think you are scared of documented reality that this warming period since the late 1970's is no different from other warming periods back to the 1800's, since you keep avoiding it every time it is brought up.

I think I will go with every scientist in the world who is not bought off, thanks.

Then post #1 goes unchallenged.

You warmists are TERRIFIED to address the documented failures of Per Decade rate prediction/projection. Terrified to address the ongoing massive "hot spot" projection failure. Terrified to learn that Sea Level rise is NOT accelerating and that it was much higher than now early in the Holocene. Terrified that there are no increases in Tropical storm energy or Tornado counts.

Why are you so afraid to address these realities?

 

[Sunsettommy]

There have been 57 comments to this point, to see that warmists provided ZERO response to the content of post #1, it is clear they have none. Thus their hilarious avoidance of the well documented failures pointed out in post #1 means they KNOW it is true and can't counter it.

Thank you warmists!

 

[skookerasbil]

First link references a proven fraudulent graph as its primary evidence. Furthermore it falls into the "correlation equals causation fallacy' that all non scientific groups resort to. Which is tragic when one considers the source is NASA. Well NASA GISS, and they are known fraudsters.

Second link resorts to outright data fabrication (proven) to support its silliness.

Third link yet again resorts to cherry picking data to compile its maps.

Fourth link is mainly opinion supported by failed theory.

Fifth link is opinion.

Sixth link is opinion.

Seventh link once again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eighth link is a "yeah us" page.

Ninth link is the famous trenberth paper where he claims the heat is hiding in the ocean deep BECAUSE THEY CAN'T FIND IT!

Tenth link is once again opinion. It yet again resorts to the correlation equals causation logic fail.

Eleventh link is to our favorite comic strip writers web page which simply regurgitates the same correlation equals causation logic fails that the whole House of Cards "theory" of AGW is built upon.

In other words you base your entire belief system on proven lies, and logic fails.

GREAT JOB!

His first 8 Links are NASA.
Then a few Class Blogs like 'Popular Science.'

The Idiots on the denial side use NO Mainstream Links/Orgs, but Jokes like WUWT like the OP.
Virtually EVERY credible Science Org on the planet agrees with GW and AGW.

Watts Up With That?

Some Failed Climate Predictions...

And of course there are going to be "SOME" Failed predictions in the Thousands of the Huge body/Huge Consensus on AGW. Some other have been successful.

Most Deniers Got the 1998-2012 "Pause" wrong.
There was None.
The Ten Hottest Years, all 1998 -2017.
The 4 Warmest, the last 4.
Bye Conspiracy clowns
`

Lol... only progressives never heard the saying "opinions are like assholes everyone's got one".

The NFL draft was last night.... every idiot football fan has an opinion on their teams selection. They can go to Buffalo Wild Wings and raise their chicken wing high in the air and proclaim triumph. The guy could even take his team colors and starting marching around the restaurant. But if you're a Cleveland Browns fan nobody watching is going to give a shit..... because you're irrelevant. The New England Patriots fan doesn't even need to go to the bar for the draft.

The progressive parading around the banner of the consensus science might as well be a Cleveland Browns fan. They can take all the bows they, want but no one is noticing..... because they're not even getting close to the ultimate prize.

The progressive just like the Cleveland Browns fan can find much solace in these minuscule victories. But deep down they know at the end of the day they're taking their bat and ball and going home losers.( see Cap and Trade / Paris Treaty / laughable growth of renewables )

After 20 years of displaying the banner, THE SCIENCE IS DECIDED, what do progressives have to show for it? Where has all the decided science had any impact on public policy anywhere in the world? The answer is, it has not impacted dick. Outside the internet forums nobody is caring.

That is not an opinion, it is scientific fact and no it is not a conspiracy, conspiracy nut job.

Meh

I only care about who is winning s0n. Your side celebrates a billboard sign on the side of the road.

Where exactly is "well the science says...." mattering in the real world? Who is paying attention to the message? The answer is.....nobody.

Congress? Nope

The people? Nope

The governments crafting carbon reducing plans? Nope

And to think.... that's after 20 years of bomb-throwing. And still nobody is caring.

Come talk to us about being conspiracy theorists when renewable energy isn't a joke. Which means you won't be talking to us because both of us will be in our boxes a long, long time s0n!!

 

[skookerasbil]

There have been 57 comments to this point, to see that warmists provided ZERO response to the content of post #1, it is clear they have none. Thus their hilarious avoidance of the well documented failures pointed out in post #1 means they KNOW it is true and can't counter it.

Thank you warmists!

Sunset....its what you see in here. Invariably. Skeptics have been dominating this forum for 10 years. Your recent arrival just makes the scoreboard that much more lopsided!!

Really...imo...Edthecynic is the sole progressive in here with any balls. Nobody else is legit.....fakers and/or insult throwers all.