Trajan
conscientia mille testes
*shrugs*Nice to see it acknowledged in print and in the NY Times to boot, kudos, 'Pinch' must be asleep at the switch. 
Does this surprise anyone? really? well, other than members of the 'tribe'?
physicians, heal thy selves....
Social Scientist Sees Bias Within
By JOHN TIERNEY
Published: February 7, 2011
snip-
It was identified by Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at the University of Virginia who studies the intuitive foundations of morality and ideology. He polled his audience at the San Antonio Convention Center, starting by asking how many considered themselves politically liberal. A sea of hands appeared, and Dr. Haidt estimated that liberals made up 80 percent of the 1,000 psychologists in the ballroom. When he asked for centrists and libertarians, he spotted fewer than three dozen hands. And then, when he asked for conservatives, he counted a grand total of three.
This is a statistically impossible lack of diversity, Dr. Haidt concluded, noting polls showing that 40 percent of Americans are conservative and 20 percent are liberal. In his speech and in an interview, Dr. Haidt argued that social psychologists are a tribal-moral community united by sacred values that hinder research and damage their credibility and blind them to the hostile climate theyve created for non-liberals.
Anywhere in the world that social psychologists see women or minorities underrepresented by a factor of two or three, our minds jump to discrimination as the explanation, said Dr. Haidt, who called himself a longtime liberal turned centrist. But when we find out that conservatives are underrepresented among us by a factor of more than 100, suddenly everyone finds it quite easy to generate alternate explanations.
snip-
If a group circles around sacred values, they will evolve into a tribal-moral community, he said. Theyll embrace science whenever it supports their sacred values, but theyll ditch it or distort it as soon as it threatens a sacred value. Its easy for social scientists to observe this process in other communities, like the fundamentalist Christians who embrace intelligent design while rejecting Darwinism. But academics can be selective, too, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan found in 1965 when he warned about the rise of unmarried parenthood and welfare dependency among blacks violating the taboo against criticizing victims of racism.
Moynihan was shunned by many of his colleagues at Harvard as racist, Dr. Haidt said. Open-minded inquiry into the problems of the black family was shut down for decades, precisely the decades in which it was most urgently needed. Only in the last few years have liberal sociologists begun to acknowledge that Moynihan was right all along.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/science/08tier.html
Does this surprise anyone? really? well, other than members of the 'tribe'?
physicians, heal thy selves....
Social Scientist Sees Bias Within
By JOHN TIERNEY
Published: February 7, 2011
snip-
It was identified by Jonathan Haidt, a social psychologist at the University of Virginia who studies the intuitive foundations of morality and ideology. He polled his audience at the San Antonio Convention Center, starting by asking how many considered themselves politically liberal. A sea of hands appeared, and Dr. Haidt estimated that liberals made up 80 percent of the 1,000 psychologists in the ballroom. When he asked for centrists and libertarians, he spotted fewer than three dozen hands. And then, when he asked for conservatives, he counted a grand total of three.
This is a statistically impossible lack of diversity, Dr. Haidt concluded, noting polls showing that 40 percent of Americans are conservative and 20 percent are liberal. In his speech and in an interview, Dr. Haidt argued that social psychologists are a tribal-moral community united by sacred values that hinder research and damage their credibility and blind them to the hostile climate theyve created for non-liberals.
Anywhere in the world that social psychologists see women or minorities underrepresented by a factor of two or three, our minds jump to discrimination as the explanation, said Dr. Haidt, who called himself a longtime liberal turned centrist. But when we find out that conservatives are underrepresented among us by a factor of more than 100, suddenly everyone finds it quite easy to generate alternate explanations.
snip-
If a group circles around sacred values, they will evolve into a tribal-moral community, he said. Theyll embrace science whenever it supports their sacred values, but theyll ditch it or distort it as soon as it threatens a sacred value. Its easy for social scientists to observe this process in other communities, like the fundamentalist Christians who embrace intelligent design while rejecting Darwinism. But academics can be selective, too, as Daniel Patrick Moynihan found in 1965 when he warned about the rise of unmarried parenthood and welfare dependency among blacks violating the taboo against criticizing victims of racism.
Moynihan was shunned by many of his colleagues at Harvard as racist, Dr. Haidt said. Open-minded inquiry into the problems of the black family was shut down for decades, precisely the decades in which it was most urgently needed. Only in the last few years have liberal sociologists begun to acknowledge that Moynihan was right all along.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/08/science/08tier.html
