- Thread starter
- #41
How exactly is the UN "ruled over" by petty dictators and thugs? Yes some have a presence in the UN, but it is rather a huge jump to go from them existing in the organization to them ruling it.
As for accomplishments, its hard to judge a preventative program. Because when it prevents a problem you never see it, since it is by definition nonexistant. However, that being said, there are numerous examples of UN successes to anyone honest enough to spend a minute looking for them. If you want just a quick few examples see UN operations in Kashmir, Cyprus, and Lebanon.
And no...just because the UN doesn't solve everything doesn't mean an operation isn't a success.
Kashmir. This has been going on since 1948 and the UN has done nothing.
Kashmir And The United Nations By Wajahat Ahmad
India and Pakistan are still waging at least cold war.
Lebanon? Now a wholly owned subsidiary of Syria
Cyprus is ancient history as well.
Nice try, major fail.
Are you really this fucking stupid?
Those were peacekeeping operations. Those are successes because of the noted lack of WAR and the lives that the UN saved.
Exactly what do you expect the UN to do in those cases? Seriously. If you want to criticize them for acting poorly in those individual cases, how do you think they should have acted?
Lack of war? What are you smoking?
Kashmir erupted in war.
Lebanon was decimated by war for 20 years
Cyprus was racked by war between Greece and Turkey.
There was not a single instance of peace keeping. They were all failures. Somalia was supposed to be a peace keeping effort too. Total failure.