Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So truth is a bad thing to be ridiculed?
If you mean the 911 conspiracy types, then label them something else.
Labels are such a political tool to be used by the parroting masses.
It is derogatory in the sense that people who call themselves as such really aren't interested in the truth.
It is derogatory in the sense that people who call themselves as such really aren't interested in the truth.
That's the sum total of the argument right there. Its pretty much the same thing wrong with the "Birthers". No amount of evidence will disspell a person's crazy beliefs.
It is derogatory in the sense that people who call themselves as such really aren't interested in the truth.
That's the sum total of the argument right there. Its pretty much the same thing wrong with the "Birthers". No amount of evidence will disspell a person's crazy beliefs.
It is derogatory in the sense that people who call themselves as such really aren't interested in the truth.
That's the sum total of the argument right there. Its pretty much the same thing wrong with the "Birthers". No amount of evidence will disspell a person's crazy beliefs.
All political labels are derogatory to somebody. no?
It is derogatory in the sense that people who call themselves as such really aren't interested in the truth.
That's the sum total of the argument right there. Its pretty much the same thing wrong with the "Birthers". No amount of evidence will disspell a person's crazy beliefs.
evidence ...huh...truth..
Dr. Quintiere said he originally “had high hopes” that NIST would do a good job with the investigation. “They’re the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job. But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire. And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this? I think it’s the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.”
“In my opinion, the WTC investigation by NIST falls short of expectations by not definitively finding cause, by not sufficiently linking recommendations of specificity to cause, by not fully invoking all of their authority to seek facts in the investigation, and by the guidance of government lawyers to deter rather than develop fact finding.
"although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures "
OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
sorry chump the moment you decide that the official lie is credible it becomes about that..and your facade crumbles
People like labels, it makes it easier to marginalize others.
People like labels, it makes it easier to marginalize others.
for example
The punchline being... Birth Certificate tea baggers don't realize they share the same bench in the dunce box with 9/11 truthers.
EXACTLY.
I've seen posts that seem to indicate others are using the term the same way I do. As in
"9/11 government conspiracy." Is that inncorrect? If not - yup, it's a derogatory term and it should be. Just like birther, holocaust denier, or folks who think Dan Brown writes non-fiction.
People like labels, it makes it easier to marginalize others.
for example
People like labels, it makes it easier to marginalize others.
for example
Because there was nothing racist at all about the "Robbin' for the Hood" and the witchdoctor signs.
People like labels, it makes it easier to marginalize others.
for example
Because there was nothing racist at all about the "Robbin' for the Hood" and the witchdoctor signs.
That's the sum total of the argument right there. Its pretty much the same thing wrong with the "Birthers". No amount of evidence will disspell a person's crazy beliefs.
evidence ...huh...truth..
Dr. Quintiere said he originally had high hopes that NIST would do a good job with the investigation. Theyre the central government lab for fire. There are good people there and they can do a good job. But what I also thought they would do is to enlist the service of the ATF [Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], which has an investigation force and a laboratory of their own for fire. And I thought they would put people out on the street and get gumshoe-type information. What prevented all of this? I think its the legal structure that cloaks the Commerce Department and therefore NIST. And so, instead of lawyers as if they were acting on a civil case trying to get depositions and information subpoenaed, those lawyers did the opposite and blocked everything.
In my opinion, the WTC investigation by NIST falls short of expectations by not definitively finding cause, by not sufficiently linking recommendations of specificity to cause, by not fully invoking all of their authority to seek facts in the investigation, and by the guidance of government lawyers to deter rather than develop fact finding.
"although the key elements of the core steel were demographically labeled. A careful reading of the NIST report shows that they have no evidence that the temperatures "
OpEdNews - Page 2 of Article: Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
This particular thread is not about what evidence there may or not be for what transpired on 9/11. It is about a group people who use a monicker (truther) to define themselves as something they clearly are not. The likes of yourself, 9/11 Inside, Terral, Creative are all attempting to make the events of that day fit into your PRE-concluded 'truth', which that our own government committed the events of that day. You may say you have all these people on your side, while I am fairly certain they would say you grossly mischaracterizing their positions.
"Truther" is a term I use for folks who believe George Bush was behind the 9/11 attacks - I apologize if that is a misuse of the term. But whatever word you use to describe these folks - it SHOULD be derogatory imho.
