Charles_Main
AR15 Owner
Just heard a report that a US f15 had a malfunction and crashed in Libya. Crew ejected. So now we have 2 sets of boots on the ground, and no doubt a rescue crew going in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wow nice fauxrage...
How about just. I hope they are ok and leave it at that you pathetic excuse of a partisan
They've been rescued.
Just heard a report that a US f15 had a malfunction and crashed in Libya. Crew ejected. So now we have 2 sets of boots on the ground, and no doubt a rescue crew going in.
wow nice fauxrage...
How about just. I hope they are ok and leave it at that you pathetic excuse of a partisan
Fuax Rage? I'm not raging at all. Just think it was silly of Obama to promise no boots on the ground, and act like no Americans would be at risk, when clearly they are.
You might want to look in the mirror before you start calling me a Partisan. Where is your out rage? Or do you reserve that for Wars started by Republicans only?
lol
stop being retarded
Just heard a report that a US f15 had a malfunction and crashed in Libya. Crew ejected. So now we have 2 sets of boots on the ground, and no doubt a rescue crew going in.
Did you ever seriously EVER thing that there would be no boots in the ground in this thing?
Fuax Rage? I'm not raging at all. Just think it was silly of Obama to promise no boots on the ground, and act like no Americans would be at risk, when clearly they are.
You might want to look in the mirror before you start calling me a Partisan. Where is your out rage? Or do you reserve that for Wars started by Republicans only?
lol
stop being retarded
Grow up kid.
You accused me of having Faux rage when I have no rage at all.
In fact I support fully what Obama is doing, though I do have some questions about his end game. (are we going to remove Qaddafi or not)
I do think it is pretty funny that Obama just did exactly what he called unconstitutional when Bush did it (attacking another country with out Congressional Approval) But that just means he is a hippocrate, I already knew that, so no rage here.
Publicly declaring our strategy to the world and our enemy was not very brilliant.
Bet ya a dollar we have a few boots on the ground already.
Publicly declaring our strategy to the world and our enemy was not very brilliant.
Bet ya a dollar we have a few boots on the ground already.
Of course, Many of the precision guided bombs were dropping rely on Special Forces on the ground painting the target.
Like I said, Obama is playing a dangerous game here. Not to mention playing rather fast and loose with the facts.
Were used to presidents doing that, but then most presidents don't run their entire campaign on the premise that they will change things, be transparent and different.
They may regret not killing Qadaffi when they had the chance.
We will see, but the goal is now "regime change."
That could change by Friday, but it is where we are today.
They may regret not killing Qadaffi when they had the chance.
We will see, but the goal is now "regime change."
That could change by Friday, but it is where we are today.
Well that depends on who you ask. Obama was very careful with his words. Notice he said Removing Qaddafi was US policy, but then pointed out it was not the goal of this UN action.
Very mixed signals.
IMO this entire affair is pointless unless you are going to capture or Kill the Man. How can you defend the Libyan people if you are not willing to take out the person you are defending them from?
stop being retarded
Grow up kid.
You accused me of having Faux rage when I have no rage at all.
In fact I support fully what Obama is doing, though I do have some questions about his end game. (are we going to remove Qaddafi or not)
I do think it is pretty funny that Obama just did exactly what he called unconstitutional when Bush did it (attacking another country with out Congressional Approval) But that just means he is a hippocrate, I already knew that, so no rage here.
its not unconstitutional, he has 90 days before he has to get congress approval.
keep it up at failing
wow nice fauxrage...
How about just. I hope they are ok and leave it at that you pathetic excuse of a partisan
Fuax Rage? I'm not raging at all. Just think it was silly of Obama to promise no boots on the ground, and act like no Americans would be at risk, when clearly they are.
You might want to look in the mirror before you start calling me a Partisan. Where is your out rage? Or do you reserve that for Wars started by Republicans only?
lol
They may regret not killing Qadaffi when they had the chance.
We will see, but the goal is now "regime change."
That could change by Friday, but it is where we are today.
Well that depends on who you ask. Obama was very careful with his words. Notice he said Removing Qaddafi was US policy, but then pointed out it was not the goal of this UN action.
Very mixed signals.
IMO this entire affair is pointless unless you are going to capture or Kill the Man. How can you defend the Libyan people if you are not willing to take out the person you are defending them from?
Yeah, that's pretty much my point. If he goes "on the lam" and the coalition falls apart (it seems to be already unraveling a bit), it could drag out for a long time, or we could wind up pissing off even the rebels.
I've never believed in war with caution. You fight to win, and you win by killing. When the target is a ruthless dictator, your first strike should be a Tomahawk right down his throat.
But this action is not about Qadaffi, or he would already be dead.