So, Jones and AGW Theory was acquitted huh..

[Old Rocks]

I guess to ask about the southern Hemisphere and take them into context to get a more global answer would be the craziest idea ever.....

LOLOLOLOLOL.....ahhh...ol' slackjawed.....clueless as ever, I see....

You do, I hope, understand that the seasons are sort of reversed in the southern hemisphere due to axial tilt, so their 'summer' happened about five to eight months ago (Dec - Feb).

Exceptional Australian Heat Wave
NASA
February 11, 2009
(excerpts)

For those who track their local temperatures using the Celsius scale, 40 degrees is a daunting number. In early February 2009, residents of southeastern Australia were cringing at their weather forecasts, as predictions of temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) meant that a blistering heat wave was continuing.

This map of Australia shows how the land surface temperature from January 25 to February 1 compared to the average mid-summer temperatures the continent experienced between 2000-2008. Places where temperatures were warmer than average are red, places experiencing near-normal temperatures are white, and places where temperatures were cooler than average are blue. The data were collected by the MODIS on NASA's Terra satellite. While southern Australia was scorching, a similarly large area of northern and central Australia was several degrees cooler than it was in the previous nine years. The cool anomaly across that region is probably linked to the above-average rainfall the area has received during this year's wet season.

Land surface temperature is how hot the surface of the Earth would feel to the touch in a particular location. From a satellite's point of view, the "surface" is whatever it sees when it looks through the atmosphere to the ground. That could be the sand on a beach, the grass on a lawn, the roof of a building, or a paved road. Thus, daytime land surface temperature is often much higher than the air temperature that is included in the daily weather report (a fact that anyone who has walked barefoot across a parking lot on a summer afternoon could verify).

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) called this heat wave "exceptional", not only for the high temperatures but for their duration. One-day records were broken in multiple cities, with temperatures in the mid-40s. In Kyancutta, South Australia, the temperature reached 48.2 degrees Celsius (118.8 degrees Fahrenheit). Many places also set records for the number of consecutive days with record-breaking heat.

Nighttime temperatures broke records, too. In their special statement on the heat wave, the BOM wrote, "On the morning of 29 January, an exceptional event also occurred in the northern suburbs of Adelaide around 3 a.m., when strong north-westerly winds mixed hot air aloft to the surface. At RAAF Edinburgh [a regional airport], the temperature rose to 41.7°C at 3:04 a.m. Such an event appears to be without known precedent in southern Australia."

***

South America hit by heat wave
Herald Sun
December 30, 2010

SCORCHING summer heat in South America is cutting harvest forecasts in one of the world's key farm belts. The heat wave has helped propel crop prices to two-year highs and is now fueling concerns about tight global supplies.

With temperatures reaching into the 90s, weather is also threatening crops in southern Brazil and Uruguay, which declared a state of emergency last week for farmers in the north of the country. The region's role in world food markets means any production problems there could be felt around the world.

Ahhhh you silly people are so predictable. So cute, just like a little kitten! Not as smart as a little kitten but cute nontheless.

Now here is what the weather was like in 1908, long before man made CO2 could ever have had an impact on the world and what do we see? Why looky here it was hot all over the damn place!

This year finally broke the 1908 stretch of tempeartures in Adelaide Australia. Wow, it took 100 years of CO2 to break that record, sounds like there's a problem with that theory.

Etc. Etc. Etc. It's the weather. It gets hot, it gets cold. Only the hand wringers try and make every weather condition equate to global warming and that is as anti science as you can get. But what do you expect from religious fanatics.



Adelaide likely to break heatwave record - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Philadelphia, PA Heat Wave Kills 5, Jul 1908 | GenDisasters ... Genealogy in Tragedy, Disasters, Fires, Floods

In the last 15 years we have seen heat waves that have killed tens of thousands in Western Europe and in Russia. We have seen fires from heat and drought in Australia that killed hundreds.

Flap yap all you want about the prior events, the shere scope and numbers are unprecedented. We are seeing the beginnings of the consequences of a major climate shift.

 

[westwall]

LOLOLOLOLOL.....ahhh...ol' slackjawed.....clueless as ever, I see....

You do, I hope, understand that the seasons are sort of reversed in the southern hemisphere due to axial tilt, so their 'summer' happened about five to eight months ago (Dec - Feb).

Exceptional Australian Heat Wave
NASA
February 11, 2009
(excerpts)

For those who track their local temperatures using the Celsius scale, 40 degrees is a daunting number. In early February 2009, residents of southeastern Australia were cringing at their weather forecasts, as predictions of temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) meant that a blistering heat wave was continuing.

This map of Australia shows how the land surface temperature from January 25 to February 1 compared to the average mid-summer temperatures the continent experienced between 2000-2008. Places where temperatures were warmer than average are red, places experiencing near-normal temperatures are white, and places where temperatures were cooler than average are blue. The data were collected by the MODIS on NASA's Terra satellite. While southern Australia was scorching, a similarly large area of northern and central Australia was several degrees cooler than it was in the previous nine years. The cool anomaly across that region is probably linked to the above-average rainfall the area has received during this year's wet season.

Land surface temperature is how hot the surface of the Earth would feel to the touch in a particular location. From a satellite's point of view, the "surface" is whatever it sees when it looks through the atmosphere to the ground. That could be the sand on a beach, the grass on a lawn, the roof of a building, or a paved road. Thus, daytime land surface temperature is often much higher than the air temperature that is included in the daily weather report (a fact that anyone who has walked barefoot across a parking lot on a summer afternoon could verify).

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) called this heat wave "exceptional", not only for the high temperatures but for their duration. One-day records were broken in multiple cities, with temperatures in the mid-40s. In Kyancutta, South Australia, the temperature reached 48.2 degrees Celsius (118.8 degrees Fahrenheit). Many places also set records for the number of consecutive days with record-breaking heat.

Nighttime temperatures broke records, too. In their special statement on the heat wave, the BOM wrote, "On the morning of 29 January, an exceptional event also occurred in the northern suburbs of Adelaide around 3 a.m., when strong north-westerly winds mixed hot air aloft to the surface. At RAAF Edinburgh [a regional airport], the temperature rose to 41.7°C at 3:04 a.m. Such an event appears to be without known precedent in southern Australia."

***

South America hit by heat wave
Herald Sun
December 30, 2010

SCORCHING summer heat in South America is cutting harvest forecasts in one of the world's key farm belts. The heat wave has helped propel crop prices to two-year highs and is now fueling concerns about tight global supplies.

With temperatures reaching into the 90s, weather is also threatening crops in southern Brazil and Uruguay, which declared a state of emergency last week for farmers in the north of the country. The region's role in world food markets means any production problems there could be felt around the world.

Ahhhh you silly people are so predictable. So cute, just like a little kitten! Not as smart as a little kitten but cute nontheless.

Now here is what the weather was like in 1908, long before man made CO2 could ever have had an impact on the world and what do we see? Why looky here it was hot all over the damn place!

This year finally broke the 1908 stretch of tempeartures in Adelaide Australia. Wow, it took 100 years of CO2 to break that record, sounds like there's a problem with that theory.

Etc. Etc. Etc. It's the weather. It gets hot, it gets cold. Only the hand wringers try and make every weather condition equate to global warming and that is as anti science as you can get. But what do you expect from religious fanatics.



Adelaide likely to break heatwave record - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Philadelphia, PA Heat Wave Kills 5, Jul 1908 | GenDisasters ... Genealogy in Tragedy, Disasters, Fires, Floods

In the last 15 years we have seen heat waves that have killed tens of thousands in Western Europe and in Russia. We have seen fires from heat and drought in Australia that killed hundreds.

Flap yap all you want about the prior events, the shere scope and numbers are unprecedented. We are seeing the beginnings of the consequences of a major climate shift.

Let's see a link to that claim of tens of thousands killed in heat waves there olfraud. Then let's compare to the death rate during winter time which kills far more. Figure 40,000 a year die in England during the winter that wouldn't have died were it warmer.

NOTHING IS MORE UNPRECEDENTED OTHER THAN YOUR GROUPS COMPLETE IGNORANCE OF WORLD HISTORY.

That is truly staggering.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Ahhhh you silly people are so predictable. So cute, just like a little kitten! Not as smart as a little kitten but cute nontheless.

Now here is what the weather was like in 1908, long before man made CO2 could ever have had an impact on the world and what do we see? Why looky here it was hot all over the damn place!

This year finally broke the 1908 stretch of tempeartures in Adelaide Australia. Wow, it took 100 years of CO2 to break that record, sounds like there's a problem with that theory.

Etc. Etc. Etc. It's the weather. It gets hot, it gets cold. Only the hand wringers try and make every weather condition equate to global warming and that is as anti science as you can get. But what do you expect from religious fanatics.



Adelaide likely to break heatwave record - ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Philadelphia, PA Heat Wave Kills 5, Jul 1908 | GenDisasters ... Genealogy in Tragedy, Disasters, Fires, Floods

In the last 15 years we have seen heat waves that have killed tens of thousands in Western Europe and in Russia. We have seen fires from heat and drought in Australia that killed hundreds.

Flap yap all you want about the prior events, the shere scope and numbers are unprecedented. We are seeing the beginnings of the consequences of a major climate shift.

Let's see a link to that claim of tens of thousands killed in heat waves there olfraud. Then let's compare to the death rate during winter time which kills far more. Figure 40,000 a year die in England during the winter that wouldn't have died were it warmer.

NOTHING IS MORE UNPRECEDENTED OTHER THAN YOUR GROUPS COMPLETE IGNORANCE OF WORLD HISTORY.

That is truly staggering.

The coldest part of the little ice age was near -1.4c colder then today around 1680 and maybe again within the 14th century...It doesn't take a lot to cause mind boggling climate change...

1880 was -.79c colder, but the periods 1880, 1860, 1810, were the coldest decades of the 19th century. The middle 18th century was as warm as the 1900 or 1920s. The 17th was very cold avging near -.6 to -1.0c this was about the same for the 15th, 16th too.

The coldest part of the last glacial that put over a mile of ice sheets over north America and europe, ect had a global avg temperature -8 to -9c at some of the colder parts. The advances where colder of course...So around -6 to -9c for about 100 thousand years. Of course there could of been warmer periods that got up into the -5c colder then the 1960-1990 avg.

We don't even have to look at the mid evil warm period or HCO to understand that it doesn't take much for big changes. I'd say as little as .5c of warming or cooling on the global scale is a large climate change within a a century.

All this talk of 3, 4c of warming in 90 years would be mind blowing. Not going to happen, but lets just say that on a global scale. I'm not going to point to it as it will start another mid evil or hco debate, but 5 million years ago is all you need to know. There was no amazon forest within south America, but savanna glass lands. I don't believe greenlands ice sheets had developed yet either.

 

[gslack]

I guess to ask about the southern Hemisphere and take them into context to get a more global answer would be the craziest idea ever.....

LOLOLOLOLOL.....ahhh...ol' slackjawed.....clueless as ever, I see....

You do, I hope, understand that the seasons are sort of reversed in the southern hemisphere due to axial tilt, so their 'summer' happened about five to eight months ago (Dec - Feb).

Exceptional Australian Heat Wave
NASA
February 11, 2009
(excerpts)

For those who track their local temperatures using the Celsius scale, 40 degrees is a daunting number. In early February 2009, residents of southeastern Australia were cringing at their weather forecasts, as predictions of temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius (104 degrees Fahrenheit) meant that a blistering heat wave was continuing.

This map of Australia shows how the land surface temperature from January 25 to February 1 compared to the average mid-summer temperatures the continent experienced between 2000-2008. Places where temperatures were warmer than average are red, places experiencing near-normal temperatures are white, and places where temperatures were cooler than average are blue. The data were collected by the MODIS on NASA's Terra satellite. While southern Australia was scorching, a similarly large area of northern and central Australia was several degrees cooler than it was in the previous nine years. The cool anomaly across that region is probably linked to the above-average rainfall the area has received during this year's wet season.

Land surface temperature is how hot the surface of the Earth would feel to the touch in a particular location. From a satellite's point of view, the "surface" is whatever it sees when it looks through the atmosphere to the ground. That could be the sand on a beach, the grass on a lawn, the roof of a building, or a paved road. Thus, daytime land surface temperature is often much higher than the air temperature that is included in the daily weather report (a fact that anyone who has walked barefoot across a parking lot on a summer afternoon could verify).

The Australian Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) called this heat wave "exceptional", not only for the high temperatures but for their duration. One-day records were broken in multiple cities, with temperatures in the mid-40s. In Kyancutta, South Australia, the temperature reached 48.2 degrees Celsius (118.8 degrees Fahrenheit). Many places also set records for the number of consecutive days with record-breaking heat.

Nighttime temperatures broke records, too. In their special statement on the heat wave, the BOM wrote, "On the morning of 29 January, an exceptional event also occurred in the northern suburbs of Adelaide around 3 a.m., when strong north-westerly winds mixed hot air aloft to the surface. At RAAF Edinburgh [a regional airport], the temperature rose to 41.7°C at 3:04 a.m. Such an event appears to be without known precedent in southern Australia."

***

South America hit by heat wave
Herald Sun
December 30, 2010

SCORCHING summer heat in South America is cutting harvest forecasts in one of the world's key farm belts. The heat wave has helped propel crop prices to two-year highs and is now fueling concerns about tight global supplies.

With temperatures reaching into the 90s, weather is also threatening crops in southern Brazil and Uruguay, which declared a state of emergency last week for farmers in the north of the country. The region's role in world food markets means any production problems there could be felt around the world.

Oh my they had a heat wave???? Yeah thats evidence of weather thanks for sharing that enlightening bit of science there idiot.. LOL and you call me clueless.. Look tool got any data for that hemisphere like the crap you guys post on the northern hemisphere? No, well then sit down junior and let the adults talk now...

 

[gslack]

I guess to ask about the southern Hemisphere and take them into context to get a more global answer would be the craziest idea ever.... Yea, Yea the world is gonna be a huge fireball and we will all burn..

So lets move on to the bigger part of the thing now. Lets try and keep a global perspective when we talk about global climate shall we?

Ever heard about the sun flipping its poles? Well it does that from time to time and although the reason and explanation is very complex for the sake of brevity and simplicity lets just agree that it happens and did so last time around 2001. Heres a big shocker our planet flips its poles too. Ours is not as reliable in its timing as the suns is and happens generally around every 500,000 years or so. And its been guessed that about 750,000 years since the last one. When the Earth flips its poles, the magnetic field changes and becomes more complex and weaker. This can allow more solar radiation into the atmosphere. Now no one can really say what will exactly happen when this occurs again, but the scientists seem to think there is no cause for alarm. heres some more on it and follow the links for even more info.

The Sun Does a Flip - NASA Science

Thats from NASA before oldsocks calls the link a bogus oil shills link.

My point is, we are just finding all of this out. And in the greater scheme of things makes me beg the question what else aren't we aware of yet? Do we know and understand the workings of our planet and solar system enough yet to make bold statements and claims about climate change and particularly the amount a trace gas making up only 0.0387% by volume of atmosphere can and or how it may effect climate on a long term scale?

There is a whole universe out there we don't understand, and for anyone to make the claim climate change is caused by a trace gas based on circumstantial evidence at best, seems not only a bit premature but an example of bad science to boot.

Now just for one second think on a scale that is larger than your immediate fear and use your dam heads for something more than a bucket to hold BS in.

G, you are showing what a dumb ass you truly are. The fact that the poles reverse has been known for at least 3/4 of a century. In fact, it was a major factor in demonstrating the spreading at the rift zones. It has been used to date fossils, and determine the position of land masses at those dates.

At no time have we seen anything in the fossil record to show that the flipping of the poles had any affect on the life on earth. In fact, it has been demonstrated by the strata in the Steens Mountain basalts that this is not a 'flip', but a disorderly process that takes a period of time.

As far as your statement concerning a 'trace gas', I guess that a similiar amount, percentage wise, of potassium cyanide surely cannot hurt you on the basis of your logic. Feel free to test out that hypothesis any time.

No tool you are showing how utterly one dimensional your mind truly is.

Did ya follow the link and read the articles tool? Bet ya didn't, not really bet you glanced at it and picked a line or two then went on in your AGW phobia.

Lets take a look and see shall we??
Heres a link that was in the link article I pointed to earlier. This will be quicker and easier for the slow people (thats you socks).
FAQ: "The Great Magnet, the Earth"

Turns out socks the pole reversal was discovered in the late 1960's sometime between 63 and 67. And Alan Cox was one guy involved in it. Heres info on COX

Allan V. Cox, December 17, 1926—January 27, 1987 | By Konrad B. Krauskopf | Biographical Memoirs

So you are incorrect again tool. Further you are equating the study magnetic poles and their drift with pole or geomagnetic reversal. Again there is drift and reversal got it ? Next time you want to take the time to try and play smart guy try and read what people link to BEFORE opening your mouth.

And as far as this line...

At no time have we seen anything in the fossil record to show that the flipping of the poles had any affect on the life on earth. In fact, it has been demonstrated by the strata in the Steens Mountain basalts that this is not a 'flip', but a disorderly process that takes a period of time.

Well tool talk to NASA cause thats where the link went moron... And since the last one was estimated to be 700,000 years ago, and your paleo- climatologists can't even get the last 1000 years right the first time (the little ice age, and the medieval warming period ring any bells?) Forgive if I am not so reassured.

Further, you just claimed "... this is not a 'flip', but a disorderly process that takes a period of time." LOL , really? well then perhaps reading the article i sent you to from NASA would have been a good idea... They say the following..

" Right now the main (dipole) field is getting weaker at a rate of about 7% per century, and if you draw a straight line through the points you find it reversing between 1000 and 2000 years from now. It might happen, though the trend may also change before then. But as explained elsewhere, even if a reversal occurs, the field does not disappear during the time of polarity change, it just gets more complex and weaker.

The polar field of the Sun seems to reverse every 11 years or so, taking about a year or more. But the Sun's magnetism is different, it has foci right on the surface, in sunspots."

Well NASA seems to disagree with your pseudo-science in their facts I linked to... Hmm well then seems you and NASA are no longer bosom buddies? Lets see if they use the word "flip" too...

The Sun Does a Flip - NASA Science

Earth Â’s magnetic field also flips, but with less regularity.

Oh my they even use the word FLIP... LOL dude this is once more that you have ran off at the mouth about a linked piece or article without even reading it... You are a total and complete nincompoop and an unethical lying little weasel...

 

[Old Rocks]

1920, you silly ass.

Geomagnetic reversal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by Motonori Matuyama, who observed that the magnetic fields of some rocks in Japan were reversed and that these rocks were all of early Pleistocene age or older. At the time, the Earth's polarity was poorly understood and the possibility of reversal aroused little interest.[4][5]

 

[Old Rocks]

" Right now the main (dipole) field is getting weaker at a rate of about 7% per century, and if you draw a straight line through the points you find it reversing between 1000 and 2000 years from now. It might happen, though the trend may also change before then. But as explained elsewhere, even if a reversal occurs, the field does not disappear during the time of polarity change, it just gets more complex and weaker.

More complex and weaker, as in a disorderly.


The Insider - Earth's magnetic field about to flip

So is the Earth about to flip? The safe bet may disappoint screenplay writers everywhere.

"Chances are we're not," said Dr Bloxham. "Reversals are rare events."

And they would certainly not threaten life on Earth as they do in science fiction. Although there would be extra radiation exposure to satellites and some airplanes, there would also be enough of a residual field to provide protection to people, and certainly no more radiation than what is observed at the poles, where the field lines currently dip.

But there would be some bizarre readjustment. Prior to Earth's poles re-establishing themselves, a period of disorder would produce multiple poles, according to Dr Bloxham, which may make backwoods camping tricky.

"Getting around using a magnetic compass would be a more complicated endeavour," he said.

A collapse would also produce a great increase in auroral activity - the beautiful display of lights generated by solar particles that follow the magnetic field lines down into the atmosphere.

And there would be plenty to time to grab a camera - the reversal is gradual.

G, are you ever going to do a bit a research, or do you enjoy demonstrating your ignorance?

 

[gslack]

" Right now the main (dipole) field is getting weaker at a rate of about 7% per century, and if you draw a straight line through the points you find it reversing between 1000 and 2000 years from now. It might happen, though the trend may also change before then. But as explained elsewhere, even if a reversal occurs, the field does not disappear during the time of polarity change, it just gets more complex and weaker.

More complex and weaker, as in a disorderly.


The Insider - Earth's magnetic field about to flip

So is the Earth about to flip? The safe bet may disappoint screenplay writers everywhere.

"Chances are we're not," said Dr Bloxham. "Reversals are rare events."

And they would certainly not threaten life on Earth as they do in science fiction. Although there would be extra radiation exposure to satellites and some airplanes, there would also be enough of a residual field to provide protection to people, and certainly no more radiation than what is observed at the poles, where the field lines currently dip.

But there would be some bizarre readjustment. Prior to Earth's poles re-establishing themselves, a period of disorder would produce multiple poles, according to Dr Bloxham, which may make backwoods camping tricky.

"Getting around using a magnetic compass would be a more complicated endeavour," he said.

A collapse would also produce a great increase in auroral activity - the beautiful display of lights generated by solar particles that follow the magnetic field lines down into the atmosphere.

And there would be plenty to time to grab a camera - the reversal is gradual.

G, are you ever going to do a bit a research, or do you enjoy demonstrating your ignorance?

LOL, dance boy dance....

YOU messed up again didn't you tool... HAHAHAHAHAAHA! now please spam the thread until no one cares anymore to cover it ups just like you always do when busted.

You said "...this is not a 'flip', but a disorderly process that takes a period of time." Correct? Of course you did... But NASA says this "The Sun Does a Flip - NASA Science

Earth Â’s magnetic field also flips, but with less regularity."

Want to argue what NASA tells me fine tool you do that smart guy lol.

Whats more you cited this part " Prior to Earth's poles re-establishing themselves, a period of disorder would produce multiple poles"

I bolded and underlined the part that tells on you for being an ignorant fool. Yeah BEFORE they re-establish themselves as in after a reversal moron...

OH but wait theres more.. LOL

You cited this source Geomagnetic reversal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and quoted only part of what was said in the first paragraph just like I knew you would do and always have done, proving you do not read enough of anything to understand it.

Geomagnetic reversal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by Motonori Matuyama, who observed that the magnetic fields of some rocks in Japan were reversed and that these rocks were all of early Pleistocene age or older. At the time, the Earth's polarity was poorly understood and the possibility of reversal aroused little interest.[4][5]

Now lets look at the rest of it shall we?

In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by Motonori Matuyama, who observed that the magnetic fields of some rocks in Japan were reversed and that these rocks were all of early Pleistocene age or older. At the time, the Earth's polarity was poorly understood and the possibility of reversal aroused little interest.[4][5]

Notice I bolded the part you conveniently left out.. And you did it intentionally because miraculously the wikkipedia citation numbers are on your quote and the full quote. Showing that you cut out the part that told the tale. He made the hypothesis but it was not proven nor established UNTIL the 1960's just as I said previously you lying little weasel. Busted again being an unethical douchebag ...LOL

Here this is from your own wikkipedia article you used ...

Three decades later, when Earth's magnetic field was better understood, theories were advanced suggesting that the Earth's field might have reversed in the remote past. Most paleomagnetic research in the late 1950s included an examination of the wandering of the poles and continental drift. Although it was discovered that some rocks would reverse their magnetic field while cooling, it became apparent that most magnetized volcanic rocks preserved traces of the Earth's magnetic field at the time the rocks had cooled. At first it was thought that reversals occurred approximately every million years, but by the 1960s it had become apparent that the timing of magnetic reversals was erratic.[4][5]
During the 1950s and 1960s information about variations in the Earth's magnetic field was gathered largely by means of research vessels. But the complex routes of ocean cruises rendered the association of navigational data with magnetometer readings difficult. Only when data was plotted on a map, did it become apparent that remarkably regular and continuous magnetic stripes appeared on the ocean floors.[4][5]
In 1963 Frederick Vine and Drummond Matthews provided a simple explanation by combining the seafloor spreading theory of Harry Hess with the known time scale of reversals: if new sea floor is magnetized in the direction of the field, then it will change its polarity when the field reverses. Thus, sea floor spreading from a central ridge will produce magnetic stripes parallel to the ridge.[6] Canadian L. W. Morley independently proposed a similar explanation in January 1963, but his work was rejected by the scientific journals Nature and Journal of Geophysical Research, and remained unpublished until 1967, when it appeared in the literary magazine Saturday Review.[4] The Morley–Vine–Matthews hypothesis was the first key scientific test of the seafloor spreading theory of continental drift.[5]
Beginning in 1966, Lamont–Doherty Geological Observatory scientists found that the magnetic profiles across the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge were symmetrical and matched the pattern in the north Atlantic's Reykjanes ridges. The same magnetic anomalies were found over most of the world's oceans, which permitted estimates for when most of the oceanic crust had developed.[4][5]

Game over tool thats another instance of your unethical behavior.

 

[westwall]

" Right now the main (dipole) field is getting weaker at a rate of about 7% per century, and if you draw a straight line through the points you find it reversing between 1000 and 2000 years from now. It might happen, though the trend may also change before then. But as explained elsewhere, even if a reversal occurs, the field does not disappear during the time of polarity change, it just gets more complex and weaker.

More complex and weaker, as in a disorderly.


The Insider - Earth's magnetic field about to flip

So is the Earth about to flip? The safe bet may disappoint screenplay writers everywhere.

"Chances are we're not," said Dr Bloxham. "Reversals are rare events."

And they would certainly not threaten life on Earth as they do in science fiction. Although there would be extra radiation exposure to satellites and some airplanes, there would also be enough of a residual field to provide protection to people, and certainly no more radiation than what is observed at the poles, where the field lines currently dip.

But there would be some bizarre readjustment. Prior to Earth's poles re-establishing themselves, a period of disorder would produce multiple poles, according to Dr Bloxham, which may make backwoods camping tricky.

"Getting around using a magnetic compass would be a more complicated endeavour," he said.

A collapse would also produce a great increase in auroral activity - the beautiful display of lights generated by solar particles that follow the magnetic field lines down into the atmosphere.

And there would be plenty to time to grab a camera - the reversal is gradual.

G, are you ever going to do a bit a research, or do you enjoy demonstrating your ignorance?

LOL, dance boy dance....

YOU messed up again didn't you tool... HAHAHAHAHAAHA! now please spam the thread until no one cares anymore to cover it ups just like you always do when busted.

You said "...this is not a 'flip', but a disorderly process that takes a period of time." Correct? Of course you did... But NASA says this "The Sun Does a Flip - NASA Science

Earth ’s magnetic field also flips, but with less regularity."

Want to argue what NASA tells me fine tool you do that smart guy lol.

Whats more you cited this part " Prior to Earth's poles re-establishing themselves, a period of disorder would produce multiple poles"

I bolded and underlined the part that tells on you for being an ignorant fool. Yeah BEFORE they re-establish themselves as in after a reversal moron...

OH but wait theres more.. LOL

You cited this source Geomagnetic reversal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
and quoted only part of what was said in the first paragraph just like I knew you would do and always have done, proving you do not read enough of anything to understand it.

Geomagnetic reversal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by Motonori Matuyama, who observed that the magnetic fields of some rocks in Japan were reversed and that these rocks were all of early Pleistocene age or older. At the time, the Earth's polarity was poorly understood and the possibility of reversal aroused little interest.[4][5]

Now lets look at the rest of it shall we?

In the early 20th century geologists first noticed that some volcanic rocks were magnetized opposite to the direction of the local Earth's field. The first estimate of the timing of magnetic reversals was made in the 1920s by Motonori Matuyama, who observed that the magnetic fields of some rocks in Japan were reversed and that these rocks were all of early Pleistocene age or older. At the time, the Earth's polarity was poorly understood and the possibility of reversal aroused little interest.[4][5]

Notice I bolded the part you conveniently left out.. And you did it intentionally because miraculously the wikkipedia citation numbers are on your quote and the full quote. Showing that you cut out the part that told the tale. He made the hypothesis but it was not proven nor established UNTIL the 1960's just as I said previously you lying little weasel. Busted again being an unethical douchebag ...LOL

Here this is from your own wikkipedia article you used ...

Three decades later, when Earth's magnetic field was better understood, theories were advanced suggesting that the Earth's field might have reversed in the remote past. Most paleomagnetic research in the late 1950s included an examination of the wandering of the poles and continental drift. Although it was discovered that some rocks would reverse their magnetic field while cooling, it became apparent that most magnetized volcanic rocks preserved traces of the Earth's magnetic field at the time the rocks had cooled. At first it was thought that reversals occurred approximately every million years, but by the 1960s it had become apparent that the timing of magnetic reversals was erratic.[4][5]
During the 1950s and 1960s information about variations in the Earth's magnetic field was gathered largely by means of research vessels. But the complex routes of ocean cruises rendered the association of navigational data with magnetometer readings difficult. Only when data was plotted on a map, did it become apparent that remarkably regular and continuous magnetic stripes appeared on the ocean floors.[4][5]
In 1963 Frederick Vine and Drummond Matthews provided a simple explanation by combining the seafloor spreading theory of Harry Hess with the known time scale of reversals: if new sea floor is magnetized in the direction of the field, then it will change its polarity when the field reverses. Thus, sea floor spreading from a central ridge will produce magnetic stripes parallel to the ridge.[6] Canadian L. W. Morley independently proposed a similar explanation in January 1963, but his work was rejected by the scientific journals Nature and Journal of Geophysical Research, and remained unpublished until 1967, when it appeared in the literary magazine Saturday Review.[4] The Morley–Vine–Matthews hypothesis was the first key scientific test of the seafloor spreading theory of continental drift.[5]
Beginning in 1966, Lamont–Doherty Geological Observatory scientists found that the magnetic profiles across the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge were symmetrical and matched the pattern in the north Atlantic's Reykjanes ridges. The same magnetic anomalies were found over most of the world's oceans, which permitted estimates for when most of the oceanic crust had developed.[4][5]

Game over tool thats another instance of your unethical behavior.

Well presented and an excellent job of blowing olfraud out of the water...not that it's too hard mind you, but this was pretty comprehensive! I owe you rep!

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL. Two idiots congratulating themselves on demonstrating their ignorance.

 

[gslack]

LOL. Two idiots congratulating themselves on demonstrating their ignorance.

Why thank you, and yes we did show YOUR ignorance pretty well...

Dude you were busted again, I would think your best bet would be to NOT draw too much attention to yourself or this thread for a while... But hey you do what you want pal, there are a lot of people who haven't seen you pull this crap before so I consider it a PSA...

 

[RollingThunder]

LOL. Two idiots congratulating themselves on demonstrating their ignorance.

Why thank you, and yes we did show YOUR ignorance pretty well...

Dude you were busted again, I would think your best bet would be to NOT draw too much attention to yourself or this thread for a while... But hey you do what you want pal, there are a lot of people who haven't seen you pull this crap before so I consider it a PSA...

Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic, slackjawedidiot. You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL.

 

[westwall]

LOL. Two idiots congratulating themselves on demonstrating their ignorance.

Why thank you, and yes we did show YOUR ignorance pretty well...

Dude you were busted again, I would think your best bet would be to NOT draw too much attention to yourself or this thread for a while... But hey you do what you want pal, there are a lot of people who haven't seen you pull this crap before so I consider it a PSA...

Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic, slackjawedidiot. You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL.

And we're winning! Australia looks set to cancel their idiotic carbon tax implementation! Something you loonies thought was a done deal! Hooray the retards are kicking the crap out of the brainiacs!

Yeahhhhh!!! Hooray for us!

 

[RollingThunder]

Why thank you, and yes we did show YOUR ignorance pretty well...

Dude you were busted again, I would think your best bet would be to NOT draw too much attention to yourself or this thread for a while... But hey you do what you want pal, there are a lot of people who haven't seen you pull this crap before so I consider it a PSA...

Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic, slackjawedidiot. You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL.

And we're winning! Australia looks set to cancel their idiotic carbon tax implementation! Something you loonies thought was a done deal! Hooray the retards are kicking the crap out of the brainiacs!
Yeahhhhh!!! Hooray for us!

Nothing to say but 'ditto' to this denier cult cretin as well....

"Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic," walleyedretard. "You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL."

 

[westwall]

Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic, slackjawedidiot. You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL.

And we're winning! Australia looks set to cancel their idiotic carbon tax implementation! Something you loonies thought was a done deal! Hooray the retards are kicking the crap out of the brainiacs!
Yeahhhhh!!! Hooray for us!

Nothing to say but 'ditto' to this denier cult cretin as well....

"Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic," walleyedretard. "You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL."

Yep I'm the retard and my side is winning! What must that say about you?

 

[RollingThunder]

And we're winning! Australia looks set to cancel their idiotic carbon tax implementation! Something you loonies thought was a done deal! Hooray the retards are kicking the crap out of the brainiacs!
Yeahhhhh!!! Hooray for us!:XXXXX:

Nothing to say but 'ditto' to this denier cult cretin as well....

"Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic," walleyedretard. "You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL."

Yep I'm the retard and my side is winning!:XXXXXX: What must that say about you?

It says I'm intelligent enough to know that this is about scientific facts and the physical reality of the situation and that you're not only retarded enough to imagine that this is about some political "winning" but also insane enough to imagine that you ignorant, anti-science, politically motivated dupes of the fossil fuel industry are "winning" whenever you are manipulated by your puppet masters into opposing the measures that might mitigate this climate change crisis and save your sorry asses from your own folly.

 

[gslack]

LOL. Two idiots congratulating themselves on demonstrating their ignorance.

Why thank you, and yes we did show YOUR ignorance pretty well...

Dude you were busted again, I would think your best bet would be to NOT draw too much attention to yourself or this thread for a while... But hey you do what you want pal, there are a lot of people who haven't seen you pull this crap before so I consider it a PSA...

Your deranged fantasies are somewhat amusing but sooooo pathetic, slackjawedidiot. You denier cult retards couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper bag but you're so moronic and confused you fantasize that you're 'winning'. LOLOLOL.

Yes well your boy messed up and made it easy so please no thanks necessary..

Now keep talking so we can root out the rest of you..

 

[Old Rocks]

Why G-String, you needn't look to far. Scientific Societies, members of the Scientific Academies of the nations of the world, and academics in the major Universities of the world. But pigs like you are good at rooting.

 

[gslack]

Why G-String, you needn't look to far. Scientific Societies, members of the Scientific Academies of the nations of the world, and academics in the major Universities of the world. But pigs like you are good at rooting.

Yes yes all of which you care little about unless they are pro-AGW theory. Every other one of those scientific institutions and scientists are by your definition bad or on the take...

Yes the "take" only applies to the ant-AGW theory scientists we got it pal.. LOL