Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Confounding,
when people choose to troll a discussion site like this one, there is no point in further communication with them. Whatever you say will entertain them and since they already know their posts are completely bullshit, you catch their attention trying to correct them. I wasted a great deal of time talking to some of these people. I think that what they deserve and what is probably the most appropriate response and what will probably get them to move on as quickly as possible is for everyone to simply ignore them.
Though I have often learnt from Crick's postings.I learned not to invest real effort into these conversations a long time ago. Good on you [Crick] for trying to show them information but it was a complete waste of your time. They were never willing to learn.
Once again with the unsupported outlandish claims.So, you believe that roughly 70,000 published PhD scientists have been taken in by, and continued to produce, nothing but pure pseudo science for the past 20 to 30 years?
And that the world's refereed science journals have failed to recognize the tens of thousands of articles and studies submitted to them as pseudoscience?
Is that what you really believe has happened?
The IPCC isn't "the global scientific community"...It is a purposely closed clique and an echo chamber.When you flatly reject the claims of the global scientific community based on your own uninformed interpretation of things there's not much left to do but make fun of you.
People like you are why the rest of the world thinks Americans are stupid.
The IPCC isn't "the global scientific community"...It is a purposely closed clique and an echo chamber.
24,210 articles published 69,406 authors during 2013 and 2014 found only five articles by four authors rejecting anthropogenic global warming.
Without the AGW hoax they make nothing.Running a global conspiracy must be a pretty high paying gig, right?
Climate Scientist average salary is $71,505, median salary is $82,514 with a salary range from $48,000 to $84,000.
Oh, shit!
$48,000 to $84,000!
They DEFINITELY entered that profession for those giant fucking dollars signs and not because they love science, am I right? They're making as much money as public school teachers! YOWZA!!!
Without the AGW hoax they make nothing.Running a global conspiracy must be a pretty high paying gig, right?
Climate Scientist average salary is $71,505, median salary is $82,514 with a salary range from $48,000 to $84,000.
Oh, shit!
$48,000 to $84,000!
They DEFINITELY entered that profession for those giant fucking dollars signs and not because they love science, am I right? They're making as much money as public school teachers! YOWZA!!!
Confounding,
when people choose to troll a discussion site like this one, there is no point in further communication with them. Whatever you say will entertain them and since they already know their posts are completely bullshit, you catch their attention trying to correct them. I wasted a great deal of time talking to some of these people. I think that what they deserve and what is probably the most appropriate response and what will probably get them to move on as quickly as possible is for everyone to simply ignore them.
I learned not to invest real effort into these conversations a long time ago. Good on you for trying to show them information but it was a complete waste of your time. They were never willing to learn.
Though I have often learnt from Crick's postings.I learned not to invest real effort into these conversations a long time ago. Good on you [Crick] for trying to show them information but it was a complete waste of your time. They were never willing to learn.
Nobody said anyone was getting rich, Captain Strawman.....Just that there's absolutely no incentive for the "scientists" to disprove the hoax.I'd like to point out something I've noted before but that tends to get lost. The IPCC doesn't spend one dollar funding research. The Assessment Reports are just that: assessment of the existing climate science literature. Researchers are not paid by research grants. Grants pay the costs of conducting research. Researchers are paid salaries by their employers. They might get a raise if they're successful at getting grants. But the whole denier meme that researchers lie about global warming so they can get rich from research grants is absolutely, nonsensical bullshit. Research gigs can pay well compared to, say a manager at McDonalds or a ditch digger; these guys have PhDs after all. Risking such a job by intentionally producing false results is a choice made by idiots. Researchers who do such things make the news and they NEVER again work in the field for which they schooled for years.
I'd like to point out something I've noted before but that tends to get lost. The IPCC doesn't spend one dollar funding research. The Assessment Reports are just that: assessment of the existing climate science literature. Researchers are not paid by research grants. Grants pay the costs of conducting research. Researchers are paid salaries by their employers. They might get a raise if they're successful at getting grants. But the whole denier meme that researchers lie about global warming so they can get rich from research grants is absolutely, nonsensical bullshit. Research gigs can pay well compared to, say a manager at McDonalds or a ditch digger; these guys have PhDs after all. Risking such a job by intentionally producing false results is a choice made by idiots. Researchers who do such things make the news and they NEVER again work in the field for which they schooled for years.
Nobody said anyone was getting rich, Captain Strawman.....Just that there's absolutely no incentive for the "scientists" to disprove the hoax.
But I do thank you for providing another bit of circumstantial evidence that you warmers are peddling a load of shit: the blatant and willful mischaracterizations of counter-arguments.
Beats going out and creating a product that others would willingly purchase....Decent pay, nice bennies, no-interest loans on their homes.The pay scales posted here is well within the normal range for PhD researchers in any field. And I know it makes you feel better to try to bring down others, but you make it so obvious it only reflects badly on you.
I think the point this thread was trying to make was that these researchers aren't enriching themselves off research grants. Unfortunately, the data presented are salaries, not grants.
Notice in the recent news bit about falsified research in the lung functions of mice, funded by the NIH and the EPA, it is the university that is charged with the fraud, not individual researchers. Obviously, some researchers must have been involved in creating false data, but it looks as if they were being rewarded on the side by the University, not enriched by the grants themselves. Research grant money does NOT go into the pockets of researchers. It pays for the conduct of the research.
