So Fallujah has fallen to al Qaida

[U2Edge]

awwwhhhhhhh


the right is getting all misty in the eyes over going back into Iraq

Look you idiots how many years did we tell you it would turn into a civil war once we left?

Sadam was a lump of shit


he was the lump of shit that acted as a cork in the middle east bottle of bees.


You wanted that cork gone.


ACCEPT what you did

Well, you're so called cork invaded and annexed Kuwait, the first country to be invaded and annexed since Hitler last did it in the early 1940s. Saddam also invaded Iran, invaded and attacked Saudi Arabia and attacked Israel, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait with Ballistic Missiles. Saddam also used WMD more times than any leader since World War I. He is responsible for the deaths of 1.7 million people inside and outside Iraq. He is responsible for one of the worst environmental disasters the planet has ever seen when he dumped oil into the Persian Gulf and lit all of Kuwaits oil wells on fire.

It was necessity that Saddam was removed and the world and Iraq are far better off without him.

Iraq now has a problem with extremist just like the British once had a problem with the IRA. That's a far better situation for Iraq than all the wars, sanctions and life under Saddam.

 

[U2Edge]

so when you righties all go back into the middle east to fight again will you pay for it this time or will you just DUMP the cost on the next democractic president who gets elected because your idiot ideas yet again fail?

The war did not fail. Saddam was removed and the oil in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia has never been safer!

 

[blackhawk]

It was predictable this would happen when we pulled out of Iraq it's sad and depressing but by no means surprising.

 

[Edgetho]

Dems, i.e., Wilson, FDR, Truman, Clinton, and Obama did the same.

Kudos for your intellectual honesty. Unusual from a dim

To libturdom in general.........

At least ten times the number of Americans died under democrats as Republicans in Foreign Wars.

Wilson, WWI

FDR, WWII

Truman, Korea

And this will come as a surprise to dimocraps (because you're stupid) but....

Two Thirds of the deaths during the Viet Nam War came under JFK and LBJ.

What Republicans do is stop cataclysmic Wars before they happen. dimocraps are too stupid to consider that. They're attitude is, "Peace now. Let our children worry about the next Global War."

Because they're cowards.

And if you people on the left don't think the ME can cause the next Global War, you're too stupid to live

"What Republicans do is stop cataclysmic Wars before they happen" is dishonest, of course.

Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush

More Americans died in the Civil War than in all other wars combined

Read it again......

 

[jon_berzerk]

It was predictable this would happen when we pulled out of Iraq it's sad and depressing but by no means surprising.

It was predictable this would happen

it was openly predicted that this would happen

 

[Desperado]

It was predictable this would happen when we pulled out of Iraq it's sad and depressing but by no means surprising.

It was predictable this would happen

it was openly predicted that this would happen

And it is the same thing that will happen in Afghanistan too.

 

[Edgetho]

awwwhhhhhhh


the right is getting all misty in the eyes over going back into Iraq

Look you idiots how many years did we tell you it would turn into a civil war once we left?

Sadam was a lump of shit


he was the lump of shit that acted as a cork in the middle east bottle of bees.


You wanted that cork gone.


ACCEPT what you did

Was there Civil War in Post War Germany?

How about in Post War Japan?

Italy?

No. You know why?

Because we didn't have back-stabbing, gutless, American-Hating dimocrap scum running our Country back then.

Truman may have been a democrat, but he loved America and believed in America.

He was also a veteran and an honest man.

But there no democrats anymore. Only America-Hating, back-stabbing, gutless, cowardly, vote-buying, scum of the Earth dimocraps.

dimocrap scum stabbed SE Asia in the back...... Result, at least 2 Million dead in Cambodia, probably just as many in Viet Nam, though no one but the murdering communist scum know for sure.

dimocrap scum stabbed the Iraqis in the back and they'll stab the Afghans in the back as well.

These people don't know the difference between dimocrap scumbags, like you, and decent, honest, Patriotic Americans like us.

We gave our word as a Country to these people to see this thing through. We promised the people of Iraq that we wouldn't desert them if they sided with us. We did the same in Iraq.

"Viet Nam?", we said. "That was decades ago, we don't do that anymore. If you side with us, we won't run away this time like we did after Viet Nam."

Yeah, right.

Do you think there will be retribution after the extremist ragheads take back the Country?

Think about it..... If you're capable of thinking.

How many will be murdered? How many will die? How many?

Didn't the lying cocksucker-in-chief just tell us only 14 months ago that al Qaeda was on the run?

Was he lying or just another incompetent dimocrap scumbag?

Let's face it, people. dimocrap scum don't care about the deaths and murders that will happen when they break their word to people. Not to Foreigners, not even to their own citizens.

dimocraps are the scum of the Earth.

And next time we tell the population of a Country, "We won't run away from you like we did the Vietnamese, the Iraqis and the Afghans. Honest."

Do you think they'll believe us?

 

[Desperado]

so when you righties all go back into the middle east to fight again will you pay for it this time or will you just DUMP the cost on the next democractic president who gets elected because your idiot ideas yet again fail?

The war did not fail. Saddam was removed and the oil in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia has never been safer!

So you going against the grain and ARE admitting the Iraq war was about oil, as opposed to WMD.
It was not our duty to protect Kuwait and Saudi Arabia .

 

[JimBowie1958]

so when you righties all go back into the middle east to fight again will you pay for it this time or will you just DUMP the cost on the next democractic president who gets elected because your idiot ideas yet again fail?

The war did not fail. Saddam was removed and the oil in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia has never been safer!

So you going against the grain and ARE admitting the Iraq war was about oil, as opposed to WMD.
It was not our duty to protect Kuwait and Saudi Arabia .

We have signed on to do that as long as the Kuwaitis and Saudis only accept USD for their oil, which props up demand for USD.

Our currency is effectively back by oil instead of gold.

 

[Edgetho]

so when you righties all go back into the middle east to fight again will you pay for it this time or will you just DUMP the cost on the next democractic president who gets elected because your idiot ideas yet again fail?

The war did not fail. Saddam was removed and the oil in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia has never been safer!

So you ARE admitting the Iraq war was about oil, as opposed to WMD.

There is a three hour special that airs on History Channel every now and then about the debriefing of Saddam Hussein before he was executed.

The story revolves around the one, single FBI agent who not only debriefed Saddam, but befriended him.

Long story short, Saddam post Desert Storm wasn't all that worried about the US re-invading. Especially not with a dimocrap as president.

What he was worried about were the Iranians. REAL worried.

So he fabricated a story about how he had WMDs. Which was believable because he did have a Nuclear Station at one time until the Israelis took it out.

And as long as the Iranians believed he had WMDs, they wouldn't fuck with him because the Iranians knew, FOR A FACT, that Saddam would nuke them into oblivion if he had the weapons to do so.

Just like today, the most brutal Wars in all of Islam are between Shi'a Sunni.

They hate each other even more than they hate us.

Saddam wanted the world to believe he had WMDs.

The CIA believed it, MI-6 believed it, Mossad believed it, the Iranians believed it, the Russians, the Chinese and the UN..... They all thought he either had WMDs or was very near having them.

Sixteen (16) of them. Sixteen UN Resolutions were ignored by Saddam Hussein.

United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

For YEARS, Iraq thumbed its nose at Weapons Inspectors. Every major political figure of the time, INCLUDING the rapist Clinton said Hussein had to go.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

And dimocraps are some dishonest scum for continually bringing this up.

Now, just sit down and shut the fuck up.

Fucking moron.

I hate dimocraps. THE most dishonest scum that has ever walked the Earth

 

[Desperado]

The war did not fail. Saddam was removed and the oil in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia has never been safer!

So you going against the grain and ARE admitting the Iraq war was about oil, as opposed to WMD.
It was not our duty to protect Kuwait and Saudi Arabia .

We have signed on to do that as long as the Kuwaitis and Saudis only accept USD for their oil, which props up demand for USD.

Our currency is effectively back by oil instead of gold.

But by all official government explanations, The Iraqi War was not about the oil.

 

[JimBowie1958]

So you going against the grain and ARE admitting the Iraq war was about oil, as opposed to WMD.
It was not our duty to protect Kuwait and Saudi Arabia .

We have signed on to do that as long as the Kuwaitis and Saudis only accept USD for their oil, which props up demand for USD.

Our currency is effectively back by oil instead of gold.

But by all official government explanations, The Iraqi War was not about the oil.

I have no idea why the neocons decided to hang the whole war on WMDs when there were a ton of reasons to go in there besides that.

But we did not extract oil from their for our use. Our allies get most of that oil. I think we get most of our foreign oil from Mexico and Canada.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Kudos for your intellectual honesty. Unusual from a dim

To libturdom in general.........

At least ten times the number of Americans died under democrats as Republicans in Foreign Wars.

Wilson, WWI

FDR, WWII

Truman, Korea

And this will come as a surprise to dimocraps (because you're stupid) but....

Two Thirds of the deaths during the Viet Nam War came under JFK and LBJ.

What Republicans do is stop cataclysmic Wars before they happen. dimocraps are too stupid to consider that. They're attitude is, "Peace now. Let our children worry about the next Global War."

Because they're cowards.

And if you people on the left don't think the ME can cause the next Global War, you're too stupid to live

"What Republicans do is stop cataclysmic Wars before they happen" is dishonest, of course.
Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush

More Americans died in the Civil War than in all other wars combined

Read it again......

No need to.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

And nobody is discussing it?

Pffffttt...this is an obvious lie.
Obammy wiped out,decimated,destroyed and put Al Qaida on the run.
Just ask him...

 

[ScreamingEagle]

and nobody is discussing it?

pffffttt...this is an obvious lie.
Obammy wiped out,decimated,destroyed and put al qaida on the run.
Just ask him...

Forward...!

 

[JakeStarkey]

The neo-cons created the conditions for the loss of American lives, treasure, and prestige in Iraq.

 

[U2Edge]

so when you righties all go back into the middle east to fight again will you pay for it this time or will you just DUMP the cost on the next democractic president who gets elected because your idiot ideas yet again fail?

The war did not fail. Saddam was removed and the oil in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia has never been safer!

So you going against the grain and ARE admitting the Iraq war was about oil, as opposed to WMD.
It was not our duty to protect Kuwait and Saudi Arabia .

Its been US national security policy to protect the oil in Saudi Arabia since Roosevelt started that policy in 1943. Its energy and its vital to the economy. Without it, the cost of putting gas in your car and food in your mouth jumps astronomically.

Saddam's WMD's are weapons that Saddam can use to improve his ability to threaten US interest in the Persian Gulf which is oil and natural gas. So its not one or the other, its both, both are linked.