SNAP (food stamps) should be restricted to rice, flour, rolled oats, and sugar

too lazy to come up with a valid argument?

That's pretty funny coming from the guy who has made no argument. I'm pretty happy with my argument.

"Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity." Solzhenitsyn

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

What was your argument again?
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, solves simple poverty in our republic.

That was your argument? Are you just going to pretend like it never happened? C'mon, big talker, too lazy to come up with a valid argument?
That is my argument; just socialism bailing out capitalism, like usual.
 
too lazy to come up with a valid argument?

That's pretty funny coming from the guy who has made no argument. I'm pretty happy with my argument.

"Socialism intentionally denies examination.There is no formal defined dogma of socialism. Instead there is only a vague, rosy notion of something noble and good, of equality, communal ownership, and justice: the advent of these things will bring instant euphoria and a social order beyond reproach. World socialism as a whole, and all the figures associated with it, are shrouded in legend; its contradictions are forgotten or concealed; it does not respond to arguments but continually ignores them--all this stems from the mist of irrationality that surrounds socialism and from its instinctive aversion to scientific analysis. Socialism dismisses its defeats and ignores its incongruities. Socialism is a reaction: Plato as a reaction to Greek culture, and the Gnostics as a reaction to Christianity. They sought to counteract the endeavor of the human spirit to stand erect, and strove to return to the earthbound existence of the primitive states of antiquity. Socialism diametrically opposes the concepts of man held by religion. Socialism seeks to reduce human personality to its most primitive levels and to extinguish the highest, most complex, and "God-like" aspects of human individuality. And even equality itself, that powerful appeal and great promise of socialists throughout the ages, turns out to signify not equality of rights, of opportunities, and of external conditions, but equality qua identity, equality seen as the movement of variety toward uniformity." Solzhenitsyn

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains its extraordinary ability to incite and inflame its adherents and inspire social movements. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity towards a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to reject it.

What was your argument again?
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, solves simple poverty in our republic.

That was your argument? Are you just going to pretend like it never happened? C'mon, big talker, too lazy to come up with a valid argument?
That is my argument; just socialism bailing out capitalism, like usual.
That's your fucking argument? How does that refute anything I have written about socialism?
 
a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation at fourteen dollars an hour, solves simple poverty in our republic.

That is my argument; just socialism bailing out capitalism, like usual.
 
Of course not, you fool . But MOST welfare queens live on junk food. That's a fact and you can't arguate a fact.

No, you're right, I can't. I would have to know what the hell "arguate" is before I could do it.

Arguate is american for argue. What part of the moon do you live on??

That's only true if you think "American" means "illiterate boob". I prefer to believe that people like you are anomalies. Sort of like a fatty tumor on humanity.
 
Poor people rarely have the kitchen supplies and utensils and counter space needed to cook from scratch.

That's not true. I know lots of women in the projects who cook some amazing food.

Nope - it's all junk food paid for by the working whites. And then we have to pay their doctor bills for getting sick from eating that crap.
 
Why do republicans bitch and whine about a program that is worth a fraction of the overall entitlements budget?
 
Why do republicans bitch and whine about a program that is worth a fraction of the overall entitlements budget?

That's a stupid argument. Like saying - bank robbery is just a tiny part of the crime problem, so lets just ignore it. THINK
 

Forum List

Back
Top