Whatever that might mean, it's got about as much to do with that point as radon did.
And well we remember how that worked out.
So you disagree that adults can agree to being assaulted? For weeks you've been whining about how somehow, a smoker in a bar or restaurant assaults you with smoke.
Then you bring up murder, rape, what else jay walking?
Puleeze
I'm afraid "Puleeze" isn't an argument.
Murder, rape and assault harm people. Jaywalking doesn't.
I get it --- this is the new radon right? Puleeze.
And no, I didn't bring up "assault" until this analogy.
Lol, I suppose your objection to smoking is?????
Assault can harm, and as a free people we are free to consent to it.
In the last 10 minutes I've watched several dozen consensual assaults on espn.
Guess since they can cause harm, we should have all football players arrested.
Oh, and those that die after one of those "assaults", consented to that potential harm.
Get it
What in the wide world of fuck are you even talking about?
Assault is illegal. You could look it up.
Methinks you must of be smokin' them self-rolled radon cigarettes...
A quarterback taking a blind side sack, without consenting to the possibility would be assault, possibly, assault with the intent to kill.
You paint with a broad brush and then pretend there is no such thing as legal assault.
So, how did the law protect the assault, and the assaulted?
Clue, it didn't.
Sport is not "assault".
This is as stoopid an argument as radon.
Ain't playin' wit chew boy. You is wastin' my time.
I leaves the question open for Dblack. He don't go full radon.