Smoking Bans

[Pogo]

Whatever that might mean, it's got about as much to do with that point as radon did.
And well we remember how that worked out.

So you disagree that adults can agree to being assaulted? For weeks you've been whining about how somehow, a smoker in a bar or restaurant assaults you with smoke.

Then you bring up murder, rape, what else jay walking?

Puleeze

I'm afraid "Puleeze" isn't an argument.
Murder, rape and assault harm people. Jaywalking doesn't.
I get it --- this is the new radon right? Puleeze.

And no, I didn't bring up "assault" until this analogy.

Lol, I suppose your objection to smoking is?????

Assault can harm, and as a free people we are free to consent to it.

In the last 10 minutes I've watched several dozen consensual assaults on espn.

Guess since they can cause harm, we should have all football players arrested.

Oh, and those that die after one of those "assaults", consented to that potential harm.

Get it

What in the wide world of fuck are you even talking about?

Assault is illegal. You could look it up.
Methinks you must of be smokin' them self-rolled radon cigarettes...

A quarterback taking a blind side sack, without consenting to the possibility would be assault, possibly, assault with the intent to kill.

You paint with a broad brush and then pretend there is no such thing as legal assault.

So, how did the law protect the assault, and the assaulted?

Clue, it didn't.

Sport is not "assault".
This is as stoopid an argument as radon.
Ain't playin' wit chew boy. You is wastin' my time.

I leaves the question open for Dblack. He don't go full radon.

 

[Pop23]

So you disagree that adults can agree to being assaulted? For weeks you've been whining about how somehow, a smoker in a bar or restaurant assaults you with smoke.

Then you bring up murder, rape, what else jay walking?

Puleeze

I'm afraid "Puleeze" isn't an argument.
Murder, rape and assault harm people. Jaywalking doesn't.
I get it --- this is the new radon right? Puleeze.

And no, I didn't bring up "assault" until this analogy.

Lol, I suppose your objection to smoking is?????

Assault can harm, and as a free people we are free to consent to it.

In the last 10 minutes I've watched several dozen consensual assaults on espn.

Guess since they can cause harm, we should have all football players arrested.

Oh, and those that die after one of those "assaults", consented to that potential harm.

Get it

What in the wide world of fuck are you even talking about?

Assault is illegal. You could look it up.
Methinks you must of be smokin' them self-rolled radon cigarettes...

A quarterback taking a blind side sack, without consenting to the possibility would be assault, possibly, assault with the intent to kill.

You paint with a broad brush and then pretend there is no such thing as legal assault.

So, how did the law protect the assault, and the assaulted?

Clue, it didn't.

Sport is not "assault".
This is as stoopid an argument as radon.
Ain't playin' wit chew boy. You is wastin' my time.

I leaves the question open for Dblack. He don't go full radon.

^^^feeling uncomfortable^^^^

Sports often involve assaults. The question that you really want to avoid is, why aren't those assault illegal?

Remember, your the one that contends that assault laws protect people from being assaulted.

Could it be your broad brush is missing some hairs?

Adults can give consent to any number of things, that, without notice and consent would be criminal.

A sign on a door is notice. Walking through the door is consent.

Discuss

 

[Pogo]

I'm afraid "Puleeze" isn't an argument.
Murder, rape and assault harm people. Jaywalking doesn't.
I get it --- this is the new radon right? Puleeze.

And no, I didn't bring up "assault" until this analogy.

Lol, I suppose your objection to smoking is?????

Assault can harm, and as a free people we are free to consent to it.

In the last 10 minutes I've watched several dozen consensual assaults on espn.

Guess since they can cause harm, we should have all football players arrested.

Oh, and those that die after one of those "assaults", consented to that potential harm.

Get it

What in the wide world of fuck are you even talking about?

Assault is illegal. You could look it up.
Methinks you must of be smokin' them self-rolled radon cigarettes...

A quarterback taking a blind side sack, without consenting to the possibility would be assault, possibly, assault with the intent to kill.

You paint with a broad brush and then pretend there is no such thing as legal assault.

So, how did the law protect the assault, and the assaulted?

Clue, it didn't.

Sport is not "assault".
This is as stoopid an argument as radon.
Ain't playin' wit chew boy. You is wastin' my time.

I leaves the question open for Dblack. He don't go full radon.

^^^feeling uncomfortable^^^^

Sports often involve assaults. The question that you really want to avoid is, why aren't those assault illegal?

Remember, your the one that contends that assault laws protect people from being assaulted.

Could it be your broad brush is missing some hairs?

Adults can give consent to any number of things, that, without notice and consent would be criminal.

A sign on a door is notice. Walking through the door is consent.

Discuss

Already did. Contact sport is not "assault", period. Your premise fails. Time to punt.

 

[Pop23]

Lol, I suppose your objection to smoking is?????

Assault can harm, and as a free people we are free to consent to it.

In the last 10 minutes I've watched several dozen consensual assaults on espn.

Guess since they can cause harm, we should have all football players arrested.

Oh, and those that die after one of those "assaults", consented to that potential harm.

Get it

What in the wide world of fuck are you even talking about?

Assault is illegal. You could look it up.
Methinks you must of be smokin' them self-rolled radon cigarettes...

A quarterback taking a blind side sack, without consenting to the possibility would be assault, possibly, assault with the intent to kill.

You paint with a broad brush and then pretend there is no such thing as legal assault.

So, how did the law protect the assault, and the assaulted?

Clue, it didn't.

Sport is not "assault".
This is as stoopid an argument as radon.
Ain't playin' wit chew boy. You is wastin' my time.

I leaves the question open for Dblack. He don't go full radon.

^^^feeling uncomfortable^^^^

Sports often involve assaults. The question that you really want to avoid is, why aren't those assault illegal?

Remember, your the one that contends that assault laws protect people from being assaulted.

Could it be your broad brush is missing some hairs?

Adults can give consent to any number of things, that, without notice and consent would be criminal.

A sign on a door is notice. Walking through the door is consent.

Discuss

Already did. Contact sport is not "assault", period. Your premise fails. Time to punt.

You're learning. It's not criminal assault because ADULTS can give consent.

The sign on the door provides notice. Walking through the door is consent.

 

[Pogo]

It ain't "consent" -- it's "sports".

Just as it ain't "cigarette smoke" -- it's "radon".

 

[Pop23]

It ain't "consent" -- it's "sports".

Dumbass, without consent it's not sport idiot.

 

[Pogo]

It ain't "consent" -- it's "sports".

Dumbass, without consent it's not sport idiot.

You can't "consent" to what isn't "assault" in the first place, fartbreath.
Next game you see -- watch what happens if somebody throws a QB down way too hard or throws a late hit. Then show me where the "consent" was, poopypants.

 

[Pop23]

It ain't "consent" -- it's "sports".

Dumbass, without consent it's not sport idiot.

You can't "consent" to what isn't "assault" in the first place, fartbreath.

God, you really are dense aren't you.

Go to the local high school and check out the consent forms that MUST be signed by a parent and get back to me.

K?

It is consent that makes the assaults legal twit.

 

[Pogo]

It ain't "consent" -- it's "sports".

Dumbass, without consent it's not sport idiot.

You can't "consent" to what isn't "assault" in the first place, fartbreath.

God, you really are dense aren't you.

Go to the local high school and check out the consent forms that MUST be signed by a parent and get back to me.

K?

It is consent that makes the assaults legal twit.

Sport still isn't "assault", mammering bat-fouling dewberry. I just checked -- it hasn't changed in the last three minutes.

 

[Pop23]

What would be considered as an assault when not giving consent, is not criminal assault when consent is given.

A sign on the door gives notice, walking through that door gives consent.

Bitch all you want

That's how it works.

Now get back to traveling those 57 states.

 

[Pogo]

What would be considered as an assault when not giving consent, is not criminal assault when consent is given.

A sign on the door gives notice, walking through that door gives consent.

Bitch all you want

That's how it works.

Now get back to traveling those 57 states.

Oh the density....
The sport itself creates the physical contact. Absent the sport (i.e. outside the game), there is no context for contact. Ergo it's not assault.


Dee You Aitch.

 

[Pop23]

What would be considered as an assault when not giving consent, is not criminal assault when consent is given.

A sign on the door gives notice, walking through that door gives consent.

Bitch all you want

That's how it works.

Now get back to traveling those 57 states.

Oh the density....
The sport itself creates the physical contact. Absent the sport (i.e. outside the game), there is no context for contact. Ergo it's not assault.


Dee You Aitch.

The sport is played by people. The people must be notified of the danger and consent to same.

A sign on a door is notification

Walking through said door is consent.

Face it, you're a bit loony