Slaves earned citizenship for their children

Discussion in 'Immigration/Illegal Immigration' started by LilOlLady, Jul 23, 2012.

  1. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,841
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +761
    SLAVES EARNED CITIZENSHIP FOR THEIR CHILDREN
    By giving this country 200 years of free labor. C-Span 3 had a forum on the 14th Amendment and Birthright and one speaker claimed slaves were brought here illegally there for they were Illegal Aliens. Not true. When there were no immigration law there cannot be illegal immigration and Illegal Aliens. One aspect of slavery was that owners of slaves were legal residents and their slaves were legal also. Those that entered the country after immigration laws were Illegal Aliens if they stole across the border without registering without permission. If Illegal Aliens want to earn citizenship for their children they have to give 200 years of free labor. Framers of the 14th Amendment did not intent birth right citizenship to be applied to children of Illegal Aliens. This goes back to biblical time.

    Acts 7:6.… God spoke to him in this way: 'Your descendants will be strangers in a country not their own, and they will be enslaved and mistreated four hundred years.

    An alien residents in the bible was not illegal aliens but alien residents who were allowed to be in the land and had to obey ALL the laws of the land. Illegal aliens has broken every law in this land from the time they entered this country. They are not the stranger that GOD told us to be kind to either.
     
  2. atlasshrugged
    Offline

    atlasshrugged Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    149
    Thanks Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +21
    I'm a little confused. It sounds like you're treating slavery as some sick rite of passage? Why on earth would you claim that the 14th amendment somehow makes up for the travesty of slavery? And how can you say what the intentions of the framers of the 14th were thinking? We have people who are qualified to interpret the meaning of our laws. They're called Supreme Court Justices and in 1898 (US vs Wong Kim Ark) they stated that it applies to ALL children born in the US regardless of parents citizenship.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    27,769
    Thanks Received:
    4,332
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +10,726
    I thought we had the slavery issue straightened out. Does the post imply that the 14th Amendment justifies citizenship for criminals who illegally cross the border?
     
  4. C_Clayton_Jones
    Offline

    C_Clayton_Jones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    41,543
    Thanks Received:
    8,933
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    In a Republic, actually
    Ratings:
    +23,869
    Nonsense.

    And fortunately we follow the Constitution, not the bible.

    Very simple, very clear, and as noted reaffirmed by the Court in Wong Kim Ark.
     
  5. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    61,514
    Thanks Received:
    4,886
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +11,886

    No, she's trying to bemoan the fact that anyone born in the US is a US citizen. She's also got a serious racist hard-on about her hatred of Latinos in general.


    She's...she's not well.
     
  6. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,841
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +761
    Illegal aliens are not all Latinos in general. 14th Amendment was law only because of descendents fo slave. 14th amendment did straighten out the slavery issue and now is a non issue. Only those born in the country to atleast one parent that is a citizen is a citizen by birth. Anchor babies/Jack Pot Babies are only citizenship by default and will NEVER be considered citizens. And it make is bad for all Latinos because they are all part of a famly unit. Every Latino family has at least one gang member in the family or other criminal.:eusa_whistle:

    cannot tell a legal mexican from an ilegal mexican. they all look alike, etc.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2012
  7. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    61,514
    Thanks Received:
    4,886
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +11,886

    That is incorrect IN FACT whether some crazy, hateful old lady likes it or not.
     
  8. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    61,514
    Thanks Received:
    4,886
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +11,886


    And there's that racism I mentioned. Thanks for confirming everything I said about you, you insane, hateful old POS.
     
  9. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,841
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +761
    :badgrin::confused:
    racist but true
     
  10. LilOlLady
    Offline

    LilOlLady Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    7,841
    Thanks Received:
    660
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Ratings:
    +761
    Yes but the constitutionality of birth right ciztizenship has NEVER been challenged. The Constitution refutes Automatic Birthright Citizenship.
     

Share This Page