Any moral absolutists out there? Here is a situation with only 2 solutions: You are a poor worker. Your relatively good young wife has a painful and fatal disease. A chemist invented a chemical cure but he won't give it to you unless you pay him 100 times more than you will ever earn. He won't take loans or negotiate in any form. By stealing the chemical you can easily and quickly end your wife's pain and disease. Do you let her suffer and die young or do you steal the drug?