Singer La Negra says LATINOS are the real racists! And a LOT worse than whites!

drunk driving deaths attributed to White people.

Actually on a per capita basis Latinos have a higher DWI rate. It's a cultural thing .....
Well, your anthropologists haphazardly classify them as Caucasian so their "race" is the same as yours, even those blacker than Michael Jordan.

For starters Hispanic is not a race so I dunno where you read they were classified as Caucasus Mtn Babies.

On the 2010 Census ... Hispanics self identified as Black, Asian, American Indian or Pacific Islander and over 1/3 of Hispanics, feeling that the current racial classifications used in the U.S. did not identify them, wrote in another race, which resulted in “some other race” becoming the third largest racial group in the United States.

What race are Hispanics? | StatChat
Take 12. Latinos and look at their drivers licenses. I will bet that 11 of them will be classified as White. That ought to account for the other 2/3rds who identify as Caucasian.
But you so- called white people are bad at trying to pigeonhole people into racial categories. You've failed miserably.
 
so their "race" is the same as yours,
Why do you assume I'm white little fella ?
Why do you assume I'm a little fella? But i did assume YOU belong to he human race...was i wrong? If so, you have my sincerest apologies.


Little Fella was not in reference to your physical stature - of which I have no idea and really cont give a rats ass - I was referring to your intellectual status which is reminiscent of an pre adolescent or mildly retarded adult
Thats a stupid analogy. But .Look at the source.:..a fully retarded misanthropic bigot.
 
NOw, you are reduced to the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Ridicule.


The point stands.
Apply the acronym, DILLIGAF, liberally to all the silly things you are thinking of saying.

APPLY that acronym


You are posting repeatedly in your defense of mass murdering communists, so it seems you do care.


Imo, I think that there is no conflict between the racists statements of Che and the support of Castro of the Black frontline states in southern Africa.


Just because those mass murdering commies were willing to work with or support blacks in their war against South Africa, does not mean that they LIKED those blacks.

Churchill worked with Stalin against Hitler. That did not imply that Churchill was sympathetic to Marxists.
Who are you to tell ne who to like? You certainly aren't any less of a racist than you think Che or Castro was. And why do you think mass killing capitalists are any better than mass killing communists? Thats a rhetorical question. Be that as it may,
Trump doesn't seem to share your opinion. He has yet to condemn crime boss Putin publicly even as Putin is waging guerilla cyber warfare against the west. Trump initiated sanctions against his Commie Russian friends only when pressured to do so by the Brits in the wake of allegations that Putin sanctioned poisoning of a Russian expatriate and his daughter on British soil.

Like Trump, i reserve the right as an American to be a free thinker and decide for myself who is evil or altuistic based on my own research and personal observations. I'm certainly not going to allow a bigot like you to sway me one way or another.

But for whatever its worth, I'm not a communist but I did admire Castro, Guevera, and Khadafi. I make no bones about that.
All of them championed causes that were
beneficial to the downtrodden denizens .of the 3rd world. and all were attacked by the west for doing so.
However maligned you may be against old Fidel for executing traitors and enemies of his regime , he did nothing our own US government hasn't done. In retrospect, Americans did worse things than Castro could even imagine. Do you think the wanton decimation of Amerindians was any less savage an event than Castro's purge in post Batista Cuba? Were children and women of Hiroshima and Nagasaki spared the horror of
firebombs and atomic blasts that burned them alive...some who suffered horrifically long after the white man's bombers were gone?

So what were you saying about Castro? Speak up i can't hear you.

I was saying don your Che Guevara Tshirt and walk down Miracle Mile.

I bet you don't make it the whole mile. :coffee:
What is Miracle Mile and where is it?
Coral Gables (Miami), Florida
 
Apply the acronym, DILLIGAF, liberally to all the silly things you are thinking of saying.

APPLY that acronym


You are posting repeatedly in your defense of mass murdering communists, so it seems you do care.


Imo, I think that there is no conflict between the racists statements of Che and the support of Castro of the Black frontline states in southern Africa.


Just because those mass murdering commies were willing to work with or support blacks in their war against South Africa, does not mean that they LIKED those blacks.

Churchill worked with Stalin against Hitler. That did not imply that Churchill was sympathetic to Marxists.
Who are you to tell ne who to like? You certainly aren't any less of a racist than you think Che or Castro was. And why do you think mass killing capitalists are any better than mass killing communists? Thats a rhetorical question. Be that as it may,
Trump doesn't seem to share your opinion. He has yet to condemn crime boss Putin publicly even as Putin is waging guerilla cyber warfare against the west. Trump initiated sanctions against his Commie Russian friends only when pressured to do so by the Brits in the wake of allegations that Putin sanctioned poisoning of a Russian expatriate and his daughter on British soil.

Like Trump, i reserve the right as an American to be a free thinker and decide for myself who is evil or altuistic based on my own research and personal observations. I'm certainly not going to allow a bigot like you to sway me one way or another.

But for whatever its worth, I'm not a communist but I did admire Castro, Guevera, and Khadafi. I make no bones about that.
All of them championed causes that were
beneficial to the downtrodden denizens .of the 3rd world. and all were attacked by the west for doing so.
However maligned you may be against old Fidel for executing traitors and enemies of his regime , he did nothing our own US government hasn't done. In retrospect, Americans did worse things than Castro could even imagine. Do you think the wanton decimation of Amerindians was any less savage an event than Castro's purge in post Batista Cuba? Were children and women of Hiroshima and Nagasaki spared the horror of
firebombs and atomic blasts that burned them alive...some who suffered horrifically long after the white man's bombers were gone?

So what were you saying about Castro? Speak up i can't hear you.

I was saying don your Che Guevara Tshirt and walk down Miracle Mile.

I bet you don't make it the whole mile. :coffee:
What is Miracle Mile and where is it?
Coral Gables (Miami), Florida
I don't have a Che Guevera T- shirtand wouldn't want to go where Batista's minions
are. But those same Cuban expatriates still visit family in Cuba and many recognize that in their old age they are better off returning to Cuba to retire with free medical care and to live out their golden years in peace and relative tranquility.
 
You are posting repeatedly in your defense of mass murdering communists, so it seems you do care.


Imo, I think that there is no conflict between the racists statements of Che and the support of Castro of the Black frontline states in southern Africa.


Just because those mass murdering commies were willing to work with or support blacks in their war against South Africa, does not mean that they LIKED those blacks.

Churchill worked with Stalin against Hitler. That did not imply that Churchill was sympathetic to Marxists.
Who are you to tell ne who to like? You certainly aren't any less of a racist than you think Che or Castro was. And why do you think mass killing capitalists are any better than mass killing communists? Thats a rhetorical question. Be that as it may,
Trump doesn't seem to share your opinion. He has yet to condemn crime boss Putin publicly even as Putin is waging guerilla cyber warfare against the west. Trump initiated sanctions against his Commie Russian friends only when pressured to do so by the Brits in the wake of allegations that Putin sanctioned poisoning of a Russian expatriate and his daughter on British soil.

Like Trump, i reserve the right as an American to be a free thinker and decide for myself who is evil or altuistic based on my own research and personal observations. I'm certainly not going to allow a bigot like you to sway me one way or another.

But for whatever its worth, I'm not a communist but I did admire Castro, Guevera, and Khadafi. I make no bones about that.
All of them championed causes that were
beneficial to the downtrodden denizens .of the 3rd world. and all were attacked by the west for doing so.
However maligned you may be against old Fidel for executing traitors and enemies of his regime , he did nothing our own US government hasn't done. In retrospect, Americans did worse things than Castro could even imagine. Do you think the wanton decimation of Amerindians was any less savage an event than Castro's purge in post Batista Cuba? Were children and women of Hiroshima and Nagasaki spared the horror of
firebombs and atomic blasts that burned them alive...some who suffered horrifically long after the white man's bombers were gone?

So what were you saying about Castro? Speak up i can't hear you.

I was saying don your Che Guevara Tshirt and walk down Miracle Mile.

I bet you don't make it the whole mile. :coffee:
What is Miracle Mile and where is it?
Coral Gables (Miami), Florida
I don't have a Che Guevera T- shirt but I wouldn't want to go where Batista's minions
are. But those dmsame Cuban expatriates still visit fsmily in Cuba and many recognixe that in their old age they are better off returning to Cuba to retire with free medical care and live out their golden years in peace and relative tranquility.

:link::linky:
 
You seem to be suggesting that his actions, were motivated by purely altruism and Love for his fellow man.


Instead of calculated political strategy.


Again, you don't actually SAY what you mean, because it looks silly when you actually, clearly state it.
You look siller by trying to grasp dialogue that is over your head. If you are too obtuse to understanfmd plain English then go bother someone else...I was doing fine before i met you and will continue to do so with you on ignore.



NOw, you are reduced to the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Ridicule.


The point stands.
Apply the acronym, DILLIGAF, liberally to all the silly things you are thinking of saying.

APPLY that acronym


You are posting repeatedly in your defense of mass murdering communists, so it seems you do care.


Imo, I think that there is no conflict between the racists statements of Che and the support of Castro of the Black frontline states in southern Africa.


Just because those mass murdering commies were willing to work with or support blacks in their war against South Africa, does not mean that they LIKED those blacks.

Churchill worked with Stalin against Hitler. That did not imply that Churchill was sympathetic to Marxists.
Who are you to tell ne who to like? You certainly aren't any less of a racist than you think Che or Castro was. And why do you think mass killing capitalists are any better than mass killing communists? Thats a rhetorical question. Be that as it may,
Trump doesn't seem to share your opinion. He has yet to condemn crime boss Putin publicly even as Putin is waging guerilla cyber warfare against the west. Trump initiated sanctions against his Commie Russian friends only when pressured to do so by the Brits in the wake of allegations that Putin sanctioned poisoning of a Russian expatriate and his daughter on British soil.

Like Trump, i reserve the right as an American to be a free thinker and decide for myself who is evil or altuistic based on my own research and personal observations. I'm certainly not going to allow a bigot like you to sway me one way or another.

But for whatever its worth, I'm not a communist but I did admire Castro, Guevera, and Khadafi. I make no bones about that.
All of them championed causes that were
beneficial to the downtrodden denizens .of the 3rd world. and all were attacked by the west for doing so.
However maligned you may be against old Fidel for executing traitors and enemies of his regime , he did nothing our own US government hasn't done. In retrospect, Americans did worse things than Castro could even imagine. Do you think the wanton decimation of Amerindians was any less savage an event than Castro's purge in post Batista Cuba? Were children and women of Hiroshima and Nagasaki spared the horror of
firebombs and atomic blasts that burned them alive...some who suffered horrifically long after the white man's bombers were gone?

So what were you saying about Castro? Speak up i can't hear you.



1. Of course you have the right to like who you like. No one said otherwise. That was a strawman you just made up.

2. I will judge you based on who you like. If you like vicious genocidal maniacs, then I will judge you was a vile person, prevented from being a monster solely because of your personal lack of power.


3. I like the way you equate the mass murder of communists, you like, with the alleged cyber "Warfare" of PUtin. That really shows how dishonest you are, and how far you are willing to go to defend lefty mass murderers.

4. They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.

5. Your attempt to defend the mass murders, and genocides and oppression of communists, reveals you again to be a vile person and a want a be monster.
 
. Of course you have the right to like who you like. No one said otherwise. That was a strawman you just made up.
You're lying again. The divide and conquer game you are trying to play doesn't work on me. BTW, I live in New Mexico so i can testify that native born Latinos and Blacks get along pretty well here.


. I will judge you based on who you like. If you like vicious genocidal maniacs, then I will judge you was a vile person, prevented from being a monster solely because of your personal lack of power.
I could give a rats ass how you judge me. Weare nothing more than strangers who crossed paths on a message board.
But there you go with trying to elicit a feeling of guilt from me for admiring heroes of color regardless of their political proclitivies. The USA has documented history full of Genocidal maniacs , but your ilk sanitizes their murderous campaigns and wraps them in the garb of heroes. But you vilify champions of the poor and underserved when they gain power and invoke socialism. When they purge traitors and .dissidents, who would do the same to them, you cry foul.. White men are in no moral position to judge anyone.

I like the way you equate the mass murder of communists, you like, with the alleged cyber "Warfare" of PUtin. That really shows how dishonest you are, and how far you are willing to go to defend lefty mass murderers.
Did you miss the part where i equated the mass murders of capitalists vs those of communists? Funny you didn't mention that!
And my mention of the Trump Putin love affair was not meant to equate the Russian Cyber attacks with what you deem, albeit erroneously, as genocide. I was drawing attention to your duplicity in excoriating communists you don't like while tolerating
the communist who Trump loves. Putin, BTW is no less ruthless or murderous than Castro or Kaddafy was .


They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.

Who is "they"? Kaddafy or Castro or are you talking about the Japanese? Don't fudge the facts on me now...be specific...because two of the above were not communists.

Your attempt to defend the mass murders, and genocides and oppression of communists, reveals you again to be a vile person and a want a be monster.

The monsters are people like you who seek to perserve the illusion of whiteness at any cost.
Your ilk has plundered, murdered, raped, and violated every natural law more than any other humans. If there are monsters on the earth...the face of the monster in chief is a pink one like yours.
 
. Of course you have the right to like who you like. No one said otherwise. That was a strawman you just made up.
You're lying again. The divide and conquer game you are trying to play doesn't work on me. BTW, I live in New Mexico so i can testify that native born Latinos and Blacks get along pretty well here.


So, you are dropping you strawman that anyone is saying that you don't have the right to like who you like?


. I will judge you based on who you like. If you like vicious genocidal maniacs, then I will judge you was a vile person, prevented from being a monster solely because of your personal lack of power.
I could give a rats ass how you judge me. Weare nothing more than strangers who crossed paths on a message board.
But there you go with trying to elicit a feeling of guilt from me for admiring heroes of color regardless of their political proclitivies. The USA has documented history full of Genocidal maniacs , but your ilk sanitizes their murderous campaigns and wraps them in the garb of heroes. But you vilify champions of the poor and underserved when they gain power and invoke socialism. When they purge traitors and .dissidents, who would do the same to them, you cry foul.. White men are in no moral position to judge anyone.[/QUOTE]


Wow. I am shocked that you made this about color. Really. YOu look at men who are mass murderers and oppressive tyrants and you see "heroes of color". Incredible.


I vilify communists because they are people who use horrible methods in pursuit of a horrific goal.


I like the way you equate the mass murder of communists, you like, with the alleged cyber "Warfare" of PUtin. That really shows how dishonest you are, and how far you are willing to go to defend lefty mass murderers.

Did you miss the part where i equated the mass murders of capitalists vs those of communists? Funny you didn't mention that!
And my mention of the Trump Putin love affair was not meant to equate the Russian Cyber attacks with what you deem, albeit erroneously, as genocide. I was drawing attention to your duplicity in excoriating communists you don't like while tolerating the communist who Trump loves. Putin, BTW is no less ruthless or murderous than Castro or Kaddafy was .[/QUOTE]


Putin is not a communist. Also when the more shit you throw against a wall, to see what sticks, the more you give up the ability to focus on whatever point you actually want make, if there is one.

If you want to focus, then stop throwing in other shit, that I might choose to respond to.



They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.

Who is "they"? Kaddafy or Castro or are you talking about the Japanese? Don't fudge the facts on me now...be specific...because two of the above were not communists.[/QUOTE]

I was referring to the communists you mentioned. Obviously.

I was not referring to the non-communists you mentioned, partially because I had no idea why you included them.



Your attempt to defend the mass murders, and genocides and oppression of communists, reveals you again to be a vile person and a want a be monster.

The monsters are people like you who seek to perserve the illusion of whiteness at any cost.
Your ilk has plundered, murdered, raped, and violated every natural law more than any other humans. If there are monsters on the earth...the face of the monster in chief is a pink one like yours.[/QUOTE]

My opposition to Marxism has nothing to do with skin color, that's your obsession, obviously.
 
]
. Of course you have the right to like who you like. No one said otherwise. That was a strawman you just made up.

You're lying again. The divide and conquer game you are trying to play doesn't work on me. BTW, I live in New Mexico so i can testify that native born Latinos and Blacks get along pretty well here.



Correll said:
So, you are dropping you strawman that anyone is saying that you don't have the right to like who you like?



The strawman you see is a fignent of your alt universe Infected mind. The reality is. that you have been regurgitating the same lie that RW drones have been spouting for years. You put ALL socialists in the same basket, shake it up and call the mixed results Communism. But Communism doesn't exist. at least not yet, it is the ultimate goal of socialist ideology to reach the communist utopian plateau, but that has yet to happen. And, not all socialist manifestations are led by brutal dictators or fake democracies like ours. On point, two glaring exceptions to the brutal murderous images of Lenin, Stalin and Mao are the modern European states and Castro's Cuba.
You will undoubtedly point to US generated anti-Fidel Castro propaganda in a vain attempt to rebut my premise. I've already been there. I too was once convinced that Castro was a despotic dictator and menace to peace in the Western hemisphere.. Then i researched and discovered what he was doing for third world nations all over the world. I saw that European masses held him in highest esteem for his willingness to make the world a better place for millions of hopeless populations being exploited by the IMF and World Bank. What mad man would send doctors to countries who had virtually none in the midst if an idiopathic diseased environment? All for free. When I learned that Castro was sending troops to assist blacks in SA in the war against apartheid, for me, he could do no wrong. Then I learned about the medical Cuban school that was accepting and teaching students from 3rd world nations

Including blacks from the USA to become doctors. The price: a promise to return to their communities and give back by serving the poor therein.



. I will judge you based on who you like. If you like vicious genocidal maniacs, then I will judge you was a vile person, prevented from being a monster solely because of your personal lack of power.

I could give a rats ass how you judge me. We are nothing more than strangers who crossed paths on a message board.



But there you go with trying to elicit a feeling of guilt from me for admiring heroes of color regardless of their political proclitivies. The USA has documented history full of Genocidal maniacs , but your ilk sanitizes their murderous campaigns and wraps them in the garb of heroes. But you vilify champions of the poor and underserved when they gain power and invoke socialism. When they purge traitors and .dissidents, who would do the same to them, you cry foul.. White men are in no moral position to judge anyone.]



Correll said:
Wow. I am shocked that you made this about color. Really. YOu look at men who are mass murderers and oppressive tyrants and you see "heroes of color". Incredible.



I vilify communists because they are people who use horrible methods in pursuit of a horrific goal.



Color is always at the root of white fear. I didn't make it about color...it was always there...but even more incredible is your inability to assess the brutality and bloody violence that marks the footprints of capitalism.. You merely dismiss it nonchalantly while braying incessantly about soviet and ROC violence.




I like the way you equate the mass murder of communists, you like, with the alleged cyber "Warfare" of PUtin. That really shows how dishonest you are, and how far you are willing to go to defend lefty mass murderers.



Did you miss the part where i equated the mass murders of capitalists vs those of communists? Funny you didn't mention that!



And my mention of the Trump Putin love affair was not meant to equate the Russian Cyber attacks with what you deem, albeit erroneously, as genocide. I was drawing attention to your duplicity in excoriating communists you don't like while tolerating the communist who Trump loves. Putin, BTW is no less ruthless or murderous than Castro or Kaddafy was .



Correll said:
Putin is not a communist. Also when the more shit you throw against a wall, to see what sticks, the more you give up the ability to focus on whatever point you actually want make, if there is one.



If you want to focus, then stop throwing in other shit, that I might choose to respond to.



Are you so gullible that you would accept the notion that a former KGB agent would abandon his communist proviso so resdily?



Putin has acknowledged that communism has a place in his heart still.



View attachment 185873





They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.

Who is "they"? Kaddafy or Castro or are you talking about the Japanese? Don't fudge the facts on me now...be specific...because two of the above were not communists.



Correll said:
I was referring to the communists you mentioned. Obviously.



I was not referring to the non-communists you mentioned, partially because I had no idea why you included them.



Learn to read things in context and some modicum of wisdom may penetrate your kool aid laced mind.




Your attempt to defend the mass murders, and genocides and oppression of communists, reveals you again to be a vile person and a want a be monster.



The monsters are people like you who seek to perserve the illusion of whiteness at any cost.



Your ilk has plundered, murdered, raped, and violated every natural law more than any other humans. If there are monsters on the earth...the face of the monster in chief is a pink one like yours.



Correll said:
My opposition to Marxism has nothing to do with skin color, that's your obsession, obviously.



Your opposition to Marxism does because you erroneousy believe that there are more poor blacks in America than poor whites...and you fear that racism and discrimination will drive the US black population into the arms of communists for relief
 
Remember how George Lopez basically ADMITTED Hispanics don't like blacks?

There are only two rules in the Latino family: Don’t marry somebody Black, and don’t park in front of our house,” Lopez is heard saying during his set in a video obtained by TMZ.

George Lopez Calls Woman a "Bitch" for Not Tolerating His Racist Joke

NOW Singer Amara La Negra says Latinos OPENLY say don't be with blacks because you're not "improving the race" i.e. making the race MORE black which is BAD!! Can you imagine if whites said ANYTHING like this?? They'd be calling them Nazis 24/7!! But Latinos make no secret about their dislike of blacks & nobody cares!! INSANE double standard!!

The Miami-born Dominican singer said she feels the need to educate people about colorism in Latin America, but she also understands not everyone is open to learning. "A lot of people will never understand because they will never be looked [at] with the eyes that we’re looked [at],” she said. “There’s always this look of ‘Ugh, la negra’ (the black woman) or ‘don’t get married to a black man, don’t get married to a black woman, you have to better the race.’"

Amara La Negra On The Importance Of Holding Latinos Accountable For Their Racism | HuffPost
RACISM
 
]
. Of course you have the right to like who you like. No one said otherwise. That was a strawman you just made up.

You're lying again. The divide and conquer game you are trying to play doesn't work on me. BTW, I live in New Mexico so i can testify that native born Latinos and Blacks get along pretty well here.



Correll said:
So, you are dropping you strawman that anyone is saying that you don't have the right to like who you like?



The strawman you see is a fignent of your alt universe Infected mind. The reality is. that you have been regurgitating the same lie that RW drones have been spouting for years. You put ALL socialists in the same basket, shake it up and call the mixed results Communism. But Communism doesn't exist. at least not yet, it is the ultimate goal of socialist ideology to reach the communist utopian plateau, but that has yet to happen. And, not all socialist manifestations are led by brutal dictators or fake democracies like ours. On point, two glaring exceptions to the brutal murderous images of Lenin, Stalin and Mao are the modern European states and Castro's Cuba.
You will undoubtedly point to US generated anti-Fidel Castro propaganda in a vain attempt to rebut my premise. I've already been there. I too was once convinced that Castro was a despotic dictator and menace to peace in the Western hemisphere.. Then i researched and discovered what he was doing for third world nations all over the world. I saw that European masses held him in highest esteem for his willingness to make the world a better place for millions of hopeless populations being exploited by the IMF and World Bank. What mad man would send doctors to countries who had virtually none in the midst if an idiopathic diseased environment? All for free. When I learned that Castro was sending troops to assist blacks in SA in the war against apartheid, for me, he could do no wrong. Then I learned about the medical Cuban school that was accepting and teaching students from 3rd world nations

Including blacks from the USA to become doctors. The price: a promise to return to their communities and give back by serving the poor therein.



. I will judge you based on who you like. If you like vicious genocidal maniacs, then I will judge you was a vile person, prevented from being a monster solely because of your personal lack of power.

I could give a rats ass how you judge me. We are nothing more than strangers who crossed paths on a message board.



But there you go with trying to elicit a feeling of guilt from me for admiring heroes of color regardless of their political proclitivies. The USA has documented history full of Genocidal maniacs , but your ilk sanitizes their murderous campaigns and wraps them in the garb of heroes. But you vilify champions of the poor and underserved when they gain power and invoke socialism. When they purge traitors and .dissidents, who would do the same to them, you cry foul.. White men are in no moral position to judge anyone.]



Correll said:
Wow. I am shocked that you made this about color. Really. YOu look at men who are mass murderers and oppressive tyrants and you see "heroes of color". Incredible.



I vilify communists because they are people who use horrible methods in pursuit of a horrific goal.



Color is always at the root of white fear. I didn't make it about color...it was always there...but even more incredible is your inability to assess the brutality and bloody violence that marks the footprints of capitalism.. You merely dismiss it nonchalantly while braying incessantly about soviet and ROC violence.




I like the way you equate the mass murder of communists, you like, with the alleged cyber "Warfare" of PUtin. That really shows how dishonest you are, and how far you are willing to go to defend lefty mass murderers.



Did you miss the part where i equated the mass murders of capitalists vs those of communists? Funny you didn't mention that!



And my mention of the Trump Putin love affair was not meant to equate the Russian Cyber attacks with what you deem, albeit erroneously, as genocide. I was drawing attention to your duplicity in excoriating communists you don't like while tolerating the communist who Trump loves. Putin, BTW is no less ruthless or murderous than Castro or Kaddafy was .



Correll said:
Putin is not a communist. Also when the more shit you throw against a wall, to see what sticks, the more you give up the ability to focus on whatever point you actually want make, if there is one.



If you want to focus, then stop throwing in other shit, that I might choose to respond to.



Are you so gullible that you would accept the notion that a former KGB agent would abandon his communist proviso so resdily?



Putin has acknowledged that communism has a place in his heart still.



Screenshot_2018-04-01-18-21-44_1522629023311.jpg





They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.

Who is "they"? Kaddafy or Castro or are you talking about the Japanese? Don't fudge the facts on me now...be specific...because two of the above were not communists.



Correll said:
I was referring to the communists you mentioned. Obviously.



I was not referring to the non-communists you mentioned, partially because I had no idea why you included them.



Learn to read things in context and some modicum of wisdom may penetrate your kool aid laced mind.




Your attempt to defend the mass murders, and genocides and oppression of communists, reveals you again to be a vile person and a want a be monster.



The monsters are people like you who seek to perserve the illusion of whiteness at any cost.



Your ilk has plundered, murdered, raped, and violated every natural law more than any other humans. If there are monsters on the earth...the face of the monster in chief is a pink one like yours.



Correll said:
My opposition to Marxism has nothing to do with skin color, that's your obsession, obviously.



Your opposition to Marxism does because you erroneousy believe that there are more poor blacks in America than poor whites...and you fear that racism and discrimination will drive the US black population into the arms of communists for relief
 
]
. Of course you have the right to like who you like. No one said otherwise. That was a strawman you just made up.

You're lying again. The divide and conquer game you are trying to play doesn't work on me. BTW, I live in New Mexico so i can testify that native born Latinos and Blacks get along pretty well here.


So, your dropping the strawman that anyone said you did not have the right to like who you want. Good.


Your pretense that just getting alone is good enough to not be "racist" in your view is dismissed. It is actually pretty much the old line, "some of my best friends are <fill in blank>."



Correll said:
So, you are dropping you strawman that anyone is saying that you don't have the right to like who you like?


The strawman you see is a fignent of your alt universe Infected mind. The reality is. that you have been regurgitating the same lie that RW drones have been spouting for years. You put ALL socialists in the same basket, shake it up and call the mixed results Communism. But Communism doesn't exist. at least not yet, it is the ultimate goal of socialist ideology to reach the communist utopian plateau, but that has yet to happen.


Actually YOU just lumped all socialists together when you state that they all have the goal of Communism.


I don't believe you, on that. I certainly believe it is YOUR goal.



And, not all socialist manifestations are led by brutal dictators or fake democracies like ours. On point, two glaring exceptions to the brutal murderous images of Lenin, Stalin and Mao are the modern European states and Castro's Cuba.
You will undoubtedly point to US generated anti-Fidel Castro propaganda in a vain attempt to rebut my premise. I've already been there. I too was once convinced that Castro was a despotic dictator and menace to peace in the Western hemisphere.. Then i researched and discovered what he was doing for third world nations all over the world. I saw that European masses held him in highest esteem for his willingness to make the world a better place for millions of hopeless populations being exploited by the IMF and World Bank. What mad man would send doctors to countries who had virtually none in the midst if an idiopathic diseased environment? All for free. When I learned that Castro was sending troops to assist blacks in SA in the war against apartheid, for me, he could do no wrong. Then I learned about the medical Cuban school that was accepting and teaching students from 3rd world nations

Including blacks from the USA to become doctors. The price: a promise to return to their communities and give back by serving the poor therein.

You were played.

Winning hearts and minds - Wikipedia


"Winning hearts and minds is a concept occasionally expressed in the resolution of war, insurgency, and other conflicts, in which one side seeks to prevail not by the use of superior force, but by making emotional or intellectual appeals to sway supporters of the other side.

The use of the term "hearts and minds" to reference a method of bringing a subjugated population on side, was first used by Louis Hubert Gonzalve Lyautey (a French General and colonial administrator) as part of his strategy to counter the Black Flags rebellion along the Indochina-Chinese border in 1895.[1]

More famously, it was used during the Malayan Emergency by the British who employed practices to keep the Malayans' trust and reduce a tendency to side with ethnic Chinese communists, in this case, by giving medical and food aid to the Malays and indigenous tribes. A British report of the time stated:

One impressive result of this campaign has been the extent to which Malay women are now taking part in political and social affairs — something still very uncommon among a Moslem people. So much for official measures to encourage racial unity. But both General Templer and his successor, Sir Donald MacGillivray, have insisted time after time that Malayan patriotism cannot be imposed from without or from above; it must develop in the hearts and minds of the Malayans themselves"







. I will judge you based on who you like. If you like vicious genocidal maniacs, then I will judge you was a vile person, prevented from being a monster solely because of your personal lack of power.


I could give a rats ass how you judge me. We are nothing more than strangers who crossed paths on a message board.


Except on some level you know I am right. Your support of mass murderers, and communism is a something any rational person would be deeply ashamed of.




But there you go with trying to elicit a feeling of guilt from me for admiring heroes of color regardless of their political proclitivies. The USA has documented history full of Genocidal maniacs , but your ilk sanitizes their murderous campaigns and wraps them in the garb of heroes. But you vilify champions of the poor and underserved when they gain power and invoke socialism. When they purge traitors and .dissidents, who would do the same to them, you cry foul.. White men are in no moral position to judge anyone.]


You are defining these people not by their actions but by the color of their skin. That is just you being a racist.

I'm judging them, and their fellow white communists mass murderers, by their actions. I lump them together, based on their actions, without concern for the differences of their skin colors.

I also do not take responsibility for the actions of other people based solely on sharing their skin color, so you can drop that tact. You are wasting your time.





Correll said:
Wow. I am shocked that you made this about color. Really. YOu look at men who are mass murderers and oppressive tyrants and you see "heroes of color". Incredible.



I vilify communists because they are people who use horrible methods in pursuit of a horrific goal.


Color is always at the root of white fear. I didn't make it about color...it was always there...but even more incredible is your inability to assess the brutality and bloody violence that marks the footprints of capitalism.. You merely dismiss it nonchalantly while braying incessantly about soviet and ROC violence.


The Soviets, the prime manifestation of marxism in history, were white. I grew up with them as the primary threat to "fear".

You are the only one here obsessed with color.




I like the way you equate the mass murder of communists, you like, with the alleged cyber "Warfare" of PUtin. That really shows how dishonest you are, and how far you are willing to go to defend lefty mass murderers.


Did you miss the part where i equated the mass murders of capitalists vs those of communists? Funny you didn't mention that!



And my mention of the Trump Putin love affair was not meant to equate the Russian Cyber attacks with what you deem, albeit erroneously, as genocide. I was drawing attention to your duplicity in excoriating communists you don't like while tolerating the communist who Trump loves. Putin, BTW is no less ruthless or murderous than Castro or Kaddafy was .


Putin is no longer a communist, and while he may be ruthless, his death toll is nothing like Castro's. And I don't know why you keep bringing up Kaddafy.





Putin is not a communist. Also when the more shit you throw against a wall, to see what sticks, the more you give up the ability to focus on whatever point you actually want make, if there is one.



If you want to focus, then stop throwing in other shit, that I might choose to respond to.



Are you so gullible that you would accept the notion that a former KGB agent would abandon his communist proviso so resdily?



Putin has acknowledged that communism has a place in his heart still.
View attachment 185873



Communism failed. PUtin adapted to the new reality, he is ruling though nationalism, not communism.


What part of that is confusing to you?





They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.

Who is "they"? Kaddafy or Castro or are you talking about the Japanese? Don't fudge the facts on me now...be specific...because two of the above were not communists.


Obviously I was referring to Castro, and other communists. What about this is confusing to you?


They were attacked for being Communists who were waging a Protracted Struggle with the end goal of world wide genocide and oppression. That you find them sympathetic reveals you to be a monster.



Correll said:
I was referring to the communists you mentioned. Obviously.



I was not referring to the non-communists you mentioned, partially because I had no idea why you included them.


Learn to read things in context and some modicum of wisdom may penetrate your kool aid laced mind.


So, you had a choice. To clarify why you included, to make whatever point you wanted to make, so that I could address it.

INstead, you choose to post partisan filler. As a dodge.




Your attempt to defend the mass murders, and genocides and oppression of communists, reveals you again to be a vile person and a want a be monster.


The monsters are people like you who seek to perserve the illusion of whiteness at any cost.


I could write a book on all that is wrong with that statement.

Let's keep it focused, and point out that you are the one celebrating and defending horrific mass murderers.


Your ilk has plundered, murdered, raped, and violated every natural law more than any other humans. If there are monsters on the earth...the face of the monster in chief is a pink one like yours.


Again with the racism. Tell me again, how demographic shift that empowers people like you, is going to lead to reduced racism.


LOL!!!!!!!!!!



Correll said:
My opposition to Marxism has nothing to do with skin color, that's your obsession, obviously.


Your opposition to Marxism does because you erroneousy believe that there are more poor blacks in America than poor whites...and you fear that racism and discrimination will drive the US black population into the arms of communists for relief


1. I actually assume that there are more poor whites than blacks due to whites being a majority of the nation, but I have never cared to research it, so I don't know. Because I don't care. About that. At all.


2. Blacks are already in the arms of the Democratic Party. That's all you need for the dystopian future that you lefties want.
 
Remember how George Lopez basically ADMITTED Hispanics don't like blacks?

There are only two rules in the Latino family: Don’t marry somebody Black, and don’t park in front of our house,” Lopez is heard saying during his set in a video obtained by TMZ.

George Lopez Calls Woman a "Bitch" for Not Tolerating His Racist Joke

NOW Singer Amara La Negra says Latinos OPENLY say don't be with blacks because you're not "improving the race" i.e. making the race MORE black which is BAD!! Can you imagine if whites said ANYTHING like this?? They'd be calling them Nazis 24/7!! But Latinos make no secret about their dislike of blacks & nobody cares!! INSANE double standard!!

The Miami-born Dominican singer said she feels the need to educate people about colorism in Latin America, but she also understands not everyone is open to learning. "A lot of people will never understand because they will never be looked [at] with the eyes that we’re looked [at],” she said. “There’s always this look of ‘Ugh, la negra’ (the black woman) or ‘don’t get married to a black man, don’t get married to a black woman, you have to better the race.’"

Amara La Negra On The Importance Of Holding Latinos Accountable For Their Racism | HuffPost
True but there is a tremendous amount of trying to unite the two by the media and the likes of people such as Al Sharpton against white people.
Where do you get your dose of misinformation every morning? The media, driven by Nixon's legacy, the War on Drugs superimposed over relatively few black on black homicides, has made blacks a collective pariah around the world. Without AlSharpton and a few other civil rights leaders, the majority Christian black community would have no voice. Thank God for Sharpton and other courageous black men who step up to challenge white racism and bigotry wherever it raises it's ugly head.
Wher
 

Forum List

Back
Top