Simple Question: What If Coach Aaron Feis Had Been Armed?

[mikegriffith1]

We all know the story of how Stoneman Douglas High School assistant football coach Aaron Feis bravely used his body as a shield to protect his students from Nikolas Cruz's bullets. Coach Feis died from his wounds. So here is a very simple question: What if Coach Feis had been armed?

Here is another very simple question: If you were a teacher and you knew or feared that your school was about to be attacked by a school shooter, would you want to at least have the option of carrying a gun at school?

And here is a final very simple question: If you were a would-be school shooter, which schools would you consider as targets--schools that you knew had armed teachers or schools that you knew had no armed teachers?

 

[Timmy]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

 

[Moonglow]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

Just not the same to the 20/20 hindsight club....

 

[Timmy]

Isn’t it weird that the football coach gets all the attention ? Two other teachers were killed too.

 

[depotoo]

Isn’t it weird that the football coach gets all the attention ? Two other teachers were killed too.

Were they shielding students? And it sounds like the coach was beloved by all.

 

[mikegriffith1]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

Are you folks just devoid of common sense? If Coach Feis was willing to use his body to shield his students, he surely would have been willing to fire at Cruz if he had been armed. To compare Coach Feis with that cowardly deputy sheriff is both obscene and absurd.

 

[miketx]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

There was and you know it. His cowardice is all over the media and he's resigned and is hiding in his home with around the clock police body guards. Next lie.

 

[BULLDOG]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

Are you folks just devoid of common sense? If Coach Feis was willing to use his body to shield his students, he surely would have been willing to fire at Cruz if he had been armed. To compare Coach Feis with that cowardly deputy sheriff is both obscene and absurd.

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

 

[saveliberty]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

He would need to have courage and use his training.

 

[miketx]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

Are you folks just devoid of common sense? If Coach Feis was willing to use his body to shield his students, he surely would have been willing to fire at Cruz if he had been armed. To compare Coach Feis with that cowardly deputy sheriff is both obscene and absurd.

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

What qualifications are there except draw, aim at the killer and fire? You criminal enablers are going to have to come up with a new way to take everyones guns, your stupid lies are not cutting it.

 

[saveliberty]

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

So you find being an easy target the better choice, interesting.

 

[miketx]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

He would need to have courage and use his training.

Which he did not do. Now he's cowering at home hiding behind police guard.

 

[saveliberty]

Which he did not do. Now he's cowering at home hiding behind police guard.

ARMED POLICE that is....

 

[BULLDOG]

What if there was an armed deputy at the school?

Are you folks just devoid of common sense? If Coach Feis was willing to use his body to shield his students, he surely would have been willing to fire at Cruz if he had been armed. To compare Coach Feis with that cowardly deputy sheriff is both obscene and absurd.

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

What qualifications are there except draw, aim at the killer and fire? You criminal enablers are going to have to come up with a new way to take everyones guns, your stupid lies are not cutting it.

Yep, You're so smart. All you gotta do is grab your gun and pull the trigger. Bullet fairies will make sure it hits the bad guy and not the kids, or the cops, or yourself. It's such a waste of time and money for the military and law enforcement to do all that training when watching a couple Dirty Harry movies,and perhaps a Gunsmoke rerun is all the preparation needed ..........Idiot.

 

[BULLDOG]

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

So you find being an easy target the better choice, interesting.

Better than mistakenly shooting kids

 

[Moonglow]

What if there really was a God???

 

[NYcarbineer]

The motive of the NRA et al to narrow the focus here down to arming teachers and who knows who else in schools is clear...

...it's the one solution that the gun manufacturers, who own the NRA, like.

 

[saveliberty]

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

So you find being an easy target the better choice, interesting.

Better than mistakenly shooting kids

I have to say watching them die and not being able to stop the shooter would be far worse for me.

 

[BULLDOG]

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

So you find being an easy target the better choice, interesting.

Better than mistakenly shooting kids

I have to say watching them die and not being able to stop the shooter would be far worse for me.

It wouldn't be easy for anybody.

 

[saveliberty]

If he wasn't qualified to engage in a combat situation, he would be just as likely to shoot some of the students.That situation isn't like you see on TV where the good guy always wins.

So you find being an easy target the better choice, interesting.

Better than mistakenly shooting kids

I have to say watching them die and not being able to stop the shooter would be far worse for me.

It wouldn't be easy for anybody.

But better for you to let a deranged individual shoot them, because it is unlikely a teacher can hit them, yet hit a student is perfectly believable.