Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
A Cumberland County man was arrested after he allegedly convinced two women to photograph or videorecord children in sexual acts.
Gary Cramer, 26, of Bridgeton, was arrested Feb. 16 by State Police at his Cedarbrook Avenue home.
This man allegedly convinced two women to arrange and record sexual acts involving young children to satisfy his perverse desires, Dow said in a statement. We will do all we can to protect children by prosecuting sexual predators to the full extent of the law.
The unidentified 20-year-old Winslow Township woman photographed an 8-year-old girl performing oral sex on a 13-year-old boy, they said.
She was arrested Jan. 23.
Dow and Taylor said the unidentified 24-year-old Woodbine woman videotaped herself performing oral sex on her five-month-old infant son.
Now if the kid won't remember the rape does it matter?
Because I have been told by many of you here that if a child doesn't remember the pain of something done to it that it's OK.
Now if the kid won't remember the rape does it matter?
Because I have been told by many of you here that if a child doesn't remember the pain of something done to it that it's OK.
He's trying to turn this into an abortion thread. Yawn.
I want to know their names. I want them registered as sex offenders like any other disgusting pervert. And I want to make sure they are never allowed around children. But something tells me they will get a slap on the wrist, some parenting classes, and will be pregnant again with a year.
Now if the kid won't remember the rape does it matter?
Because I have been told by many of you here that if a child doesn't remember the pain of something done to it that it's OK.
You are a sick motherfucker.
So here's the deal. They take the baby to the nursery. pull the foreskin up, snip it off, the kid screams like hell. you dress it with sterile vasaline soaked guaze. wrap him back up soothe him, he goes promptly to sleep and will never even remember a nano second of circumcision.
A. Circumcisions aren't videotaped and put on the internet
How can someone remember the humiliation of an act but not the event that is supposed to have brought about the humiliation?B. The infant will forget the act; not the humiliation
I know women who'd disagreeWomen forget the pain of childbirth
Young children do, just as they forget suckling form their mother's breast. Your argument condemns having sex with a ten-year-old but not with an infant whose brain is not yet developed enough to form long-term memories.They never forget being raped.
How are you defining rape? The founder of the Family told reporters that he enjoyed sex when he was young. Masturbation and sex play [eg: 'playing doctor'] among young children is not unknown.Those children were raped.
A. Circumcisions aren't videotaped and put on the internet
So you don't have a problem with paedophilia- only with pornography?How can someone remember the humiliation of an act but not the event that is supposed to have brought about the humiliation?B. The infant will forget the act; not the humiliation
I know women who'd disagree
Young children do, just as they forget suckling form their mother's breast. Your argument condemns having sex with a ten-year-old but not with an infant whose brain is not yet developed enough to form long-term memories.They never forget being raped.
You really should reconsider that argument.How are you defining rape? The founder of the Family told reporters that he enjoyed sex when he was young. Masturbation and sex play [eg: 'playing doctor'] among young children is not unknown.Those children were raped.
Are you sure all the children in question were compelled to act against their will and experienced the 'humiliation' you mentioned earlier any more than any given woman is humiliated by sex? Or are you assuming what you want to be true?
Or is there another reason this is wrong? If so, you really should argue that case, because the arguments you're raising don't actually argue what i think you mean to argue.
A. Circumcisions aren't videotaped and put on the internet
So you don't have a problem with paedophilia- only with pornography?
How can someone remember the humiliation of an act but not the event that is supposed to have brought about the humiliation?
I know women who'd disagree
Young children do, just as they forget suckling form their mother's breast. Your argument condemns having sex with a ten-year-old but not with an infant whose brain is not yet developed enough to form long-term memories.
You really should reconsider that argument.How are you defining rape? The founder of the Family told reporters that he enjoyed sex when he was young. Masturbation and sex play [eg: 'playing doctor'] among young children is not unknown.Those children were raped.
Are you sure all the children in question were compelled to act against their will and experienced the 'humiliation' you mentioned earlier any more than any given woman is humiliated by sex? Or are you assuming what you want to be true?
Or is there another reason this is wrong? If so, you really should argue that case, because the arguments you're raising don't actually argue what i think you mean to argue.
You are also a sick motherfucker.
You and Skull should have a contest to see which of you is the most disgusting, vile, worthless piece of shit.
Mini 14 said:Hi, you have received -45 reputation points from Mini 14.
Reputation was given for this post.
Comment:
Touche
Regards,
Mini 14
Note: This is an automated message.
You concede the point and neg me for making it?
Which, interestingly, used to be legal. If memory serves, it was in the 70s that it was made criminal. Part of the sweeping reforms that also saw marital rape criminalized. The second-wave and early third-wave feminists played a major role in those changes.The only taboo left in the modern degenerate hollywood based society (thank God) is sex with underage kids..
