Should welfare recipients be allowed to breed?

[manifold]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

 

[strollingbones]

some days you are such a mouth breather

 

[manifold]

some days you are such a mouth breather

And everyday sarcasm eludes you.

But whatcha gonna do?

 

[Modbert]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

I'm interested in seeing the post that inspired this now.

 

[Mr Natural]

They should be offered a cash bonus (voluntary, of course) to come in and get a free spaying or neuterization.

 

[Valerie]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

I'm interested in seeing the post that inspired this now.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...e-recipients-be-able-to-vote.html#post3820851

 

[Skull Pilot]

All welfare checks should come with a mandatory birth control pill.

If one enters the welfare program with 2 kids then all benefits should be calculated for 2 and only 2 kids there should be no additional money for children birthed after entering the program.

 

[Big Black Dog]

You guys are hard core.

 

[Modbert]

I just noticed Welfare is spelled wrong in the title, I'll fix that.

 

[Modbert]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...e-recipients-be-able-to-vote.html#post3820851

Thank you.

 

[Sallow]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Should there be a Ministry of Welfare Recipient Breeding, set up?

Clearly this would need to be tracked.

 

[Sallow]

All welfare checks should come with a mandatory birth control pill.

If one enters the welfare program with 2 kids then all benefits should be calculated for 2 and only 2 kids there should be no additional money for children birthed after entering the program.

Interesting.

And the kids could be inducted into the Surrogate Labor Action Vindication Employment force or S.L.A.V.E, to offset the cost of the welfare.

Hmm..this is really starting to gel.

 

[manifold]

All welfare checks should come with a mandatory birth control pill.

If one enters the welfare program with 2 kids then all benefits should be calculated for 2 and only 2 kids there should be no additional money for children birthed after entering the program.

Interesting.

And the kids could be inducted into the Surrogate Labor Action Vindication Employment force or S.L.A.V.E, to offset the cost of the welfare.

Hmm..this is really starting to gel.

 

[VaYank5150]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Would this "trickle down" to corporate welfare recipients as well?

 

[manifold]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Would this "trickle down" to corporate welfare recipients as well?

That's not welfare. That's economy stimulating subsidization. Totally different.

 

[Sallow]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Would this "trickle down" to corporate welfare recipients as well?

Heavens to betsy..what are you a communist or something?

Corporations are sacrosanct like the baby jeebus because they are working overtime to..um..produce..um..stuff.

Yeah. Producers.

 

[L.K.Eder]

some days you are such a mouth breather

as long as he is not a mouth breeder on welfare, that's ok.

but even worse are cuckoo catfish on welfare, who get other fish to breed their cuckoo catfish offspring in their mouth.

and the worst is, you cannot eat catfish without going to hell.

 

[Dot Com]

They will, of course, need a "Czar" to administer the program and we all know how the Beck- bots feel about Czars LOL

 

[Sallow]

some days you are such a mouth breather

as long as he is not a mouth breeder on welfare, that's ok.

but even worse are cuckoo catfish on welfare, who get other fish to breed their cuckoo catfish offspring in their mouth.

and the worst is, you cannot eat catfish without going to hell.

Uh oh..going to hell here.

Um..is there any way to like renounce my eating of catfish to get in good wit' the big guy?

( Damn that catfish and it's flavor! )

 

[Two Thumbs]

However many you enter welfare with, that's what you get support for.

If you have more, ya better get a job and feed it.