Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You posted this nonsense? Are you one of the uneducated people they refer to from the Appalachia area of the US? I didn't know my comments that I post were for the uneducated. Thank you for confirming that the "righties" are just that! What else do you got that we Democrats are doing to the Republitard's? I need to pop more corn. Hold on. I'll be back!Lately the Democratic party and "left" wing media has been used for the purposes of rabble rousing, inciting violence, and perpetuating misinformation to the uneducated Demographic.
This could give as a good case for repealing the First Amendment, or using the state's power to shut down Democratic media, including social media which incites violence and anarchy.
In practice, I don't think it would be too easy to do - the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
In practice, most of their "rights" are imaginary anyway, and are merely fed to them via their misinformation outlets by rabble rousers - simply shut them all down, and remind the Democratic party and it's mouth-breading demographic of their rightful place under the state's hierarchy.
As an example, anyone who uses the term "white supremacist", "Nazi", or "fascist" could be profiled by the FBI and the CIA, given that anarchist groups have abused this term. (Much as how actual white supremacy groups may be being monitored as well).
Can you give me a "both sides" example of Alex Jones level propaganda by NPR??If you'd so much as read a single book in your life, or a website like "Media Bias Fact Check" you'd laugh at that statement, and realize that reality didn't begin a few decades ago when your favorite propaganda news network was invented. Just as if you quit watching it, and tuned into "Alex Jones" you'd probably be regurgitating that as factual as well.Conservatives never believed in free speech.....this post is just further proof of it.....
As much as I detest the propaganda of INFOWARS, Truth TV and Fox News.....I don't want them shut down, instead I laugh at how easily they crumble when present with real facts...
I laugh at how stupid those who believe them look when they are challenged to back up the propaganda with anything factual...….Facts have a liberal bias that is why these folks can't stand any objective reporting....
Mass media is primarily about branding, and the hallmark of idiots whose education and intelligence stunted at the 6th grade level, which most of it is marketed to. It's all "propaganda" by the very definition.
Facts are pieces of information, they don't have "bias", but can be used in favor of one or the other.
Per Constitutional originalism, the 1st Amendment doesn't give one the right to use fighting words, including on the internet.
We potentially could use this to ban and censor all left wing media outlets which use loaded terms like "racist", "fascist", "white Supremacist", "Nazi", and so forth.
I wouldn't mind it myself, it would be just like separating the wheat from the chaff, and only those too weak or immoral to control their impulses, or gain any articulation above that of a mouth-breathing primate would make those words and terms a frequent part of their vocabulary anyway. Who would miss it, other than the underclass and the slave class?
They give the most even handed reporting of the news, with the least disrespect of the President, of any of the major news outlets. They have a left leaning slant in the issues they choose to cover, but I have never heard a single one of them foaming at the mouth about the President or Republicans, not even their guests.NPR and PBS, at a minimum, need to have their funding from taxpayers ceased. These entities generate millions from donations. Taking taxpayer money for Left Wing propaganda is an insult.
You would be shooting the wrong folks here.
Lately the Democratic party and "left" wing media has been used for the purposes of rabble rousing, inciting violence, and perpetuating misinformation to the uneducated Demographic.
This could give as a good case for repealing the First Amendment, or using the state's power to shut down Democratic media, including social media which incites violence and anarchy.
In practice, I don't think it would be too easy to do - the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
In practice, most of their "rights" are imaginary anyway, and are merely fed to them via their misinformation outlets by rabble rousers - simply shut them all down, and remind the Democratic party and it's mouth-breading demographic of their rightful place under the state's hierarchy.
As an example, anyone who uses the term "white supremacist", "Nazi", or "fascist" could be profiled by the FBI and the CIA, given that anarchist groups have abused this term. (Much as how actual white supremacy groups may be being monitored as well).
If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant
They give the most even handed reporting of the news, with the least disrespect of the President, of any of the major news outlets. They have a left leaning slant in the issues they choose to cover, but I have never heard a single one of them foaming at the mouth about the President or Republicans, not even their guests.NPR and PBS, at a minimum, need to have their funding from taxpayers ceased. These entities generate millions from donations. Taking taxpayer money for Left Wing propaganda is an insult.
You would be shooting the wrong folks here.
If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever. In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media.
Lately the Democratic party and "left" wing media has been used for the purposes of rabble rousing, inciting violence, and perpetuating misinformation to the uneducated Demographic.
This could give as a good case for repealing the First Amendment, or using the state's power to shut down Democratic media, including social media which incites violence and anarchy.
In practice, I don't think it would be too easy to do - the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
In practice, most of their "rights" are imaginary anyway, and are merely fed to them via their misinformation outlets by rabble rousers - simply shut them all down, and remind the Democratic party and it's mouth-breading demographic of their rightful place under the state's hierarchy.
As an example, anyone who uses the term "white supremacist", "Nazi", or "fascist" could be profiled by the FBI and the CIA, given that anarchist groups have abused this term. (Much as how actual white supremacy groups may be being monitored as well).
No. We should not shut them down.
As incorrigible as they may be, they have first amendment rights. Freedom of the Press.
They have the freedom to lie. You have the freedom to refute their lies.
Lately the Democratic party and "left" wing media has been used for the purposes of rabble rousing, inciting violence, and perpetuating misinformation to the uneducated Demographic.
This could give as a good case for repealing the First Amendment, or using the state's power to shut down Democratic media, including social media which incites violence and anarchy.
In practice, I don't think it would be too easy to do - the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
In practice, most of their "rights" are imaginary anyway, and are merely fed to them via their misinformation outlets by rabble rousers - simply shut them all down, and remind the Democratic party and it's mouth-breading demographic of their rightful place under the state's hierarchy.
As an example, anyone who uses the term "white supremacist", "Nazi", or "fascist" could be profiled by the FBI and the CIA, given that anarchist groups have abused this term. (Much as how actual white supremacy groups may be being monitored as well).
That isn't what the article said, Mr. Beale. If I were you, I'd read it again.Oh, I forgot, I booked marked this.What's the "CFR," Mr. Beale?Bullshit.
They are mouth piece for the CFR, the Anglo-American alliance, and global capitalists everywhere.
Apparently you don't pay attention to the foundations that support their work.
I can't believe you are utterly this dumb.
They serve the interests of the richest of the one percent.
lol.
Here is the answer right from one of their own journalists. NYT and WaPo are two of their main propaganda organs from brainwashing folks. Never trust anything from those papers.
Except when they admit they are brainwashing you!
Click on the link below, I still can't believe they told the truth for once. lol
Ruling Class Journalists
by Richard Harwood
What do you mean that isn't what the article says? Of course it is. You asked what the CFR was, and that article answers that question. It is an outfit to brainwash folks and make policy for the US. All these elites think they are better, and know better than the American public. It is why you think the things you do about Ukraine and Crowd-strike, which are all in dispute.
Christ you are obtuse.
Even politicians on the left and right admit this shit.
Why are you in denial?
It is an outfit to brainwash folks
This is the part I'm having trouble with, and your article certainly did not go in to that. Read the closing paragraphs.
They give the most even handed reporting of the news, with the least disrespect of the President, of any of the major news outlets. They have a left leaning slant in the issues they choose to cover, but I have never heard a single one of them foaming at the mouth about the President or Republicans, not even their guests.NPR and PBS, at a minimum, need to have their funding from taxpayers ceased. These entities generate millions from donations. Taking taxpayer money for Left Wing propaganda is an insult.
You would be shooting the wrong folks here.
If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever. In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media.
"If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever."
Agreed.
Just the facts.
even if the facts turn out to have a liberal bias
"In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media"
in an era with anyone with an AGENDA and a BIAS can start a media brand we NEED a TAX PAYER FUNDED news outlet that disseminates JUST THE FACTS.
the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
Bogus, Media Bias Fact Check ranks them as left biased.They give the most even handed reporting of the news, with the least disrespect of the President, of any of the major news outlets. They have a left leaning slant in the issues they choose to cover, but I have never heard a single one of them foaming at the mouth about the President or Republicans, not even their guests.NPR and PBS, at a minimum, need to have their funding from taxpayers ceased. These entities generate millions from donations. Taking taxpayer money for Left Wing propaganda is an insult.
You would be shooting the wrong folks here.
If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever. In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media.
"If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever."
Agreed.
Just the facts.
even if the facts turn out to have a liberal bias
"In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media"
in an era with anyone with an AGENDA and a BIAS can start a media brand we NEED a TAX PAYER FUNDED news outlet that disseminates JUST THE FACTS.
JUST THE FACTS needs to be regulated. There can and should be NO bias on any side or from any angle. For anyone to deny that there currently exists no bias or agenda at NPR and PBS is not making the case for tax payer funds.
Bogus, Media Bias Fact Check ranks them as left biased.They give the most even handed reporting of the news, with the least disrespect of the President, of any of the major news outlets. They have a left leaning slant in the issues they choose to cover, but I have never heard a single one of them foaming at the mouth about the President or Republicans, not even their guests.NPR and PBS, at a minimum, need to have their funding from taxpayers ceased. These entities generate millions from donations. Taking taxpayer money for Left Wing propaganda is an insult.
You would be shooting the wrong folks here.
If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever. In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media.
"If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever."
Agreed.
Just the facts.
even if the facts turn out to have a liberal bias
"In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media"
in an era with anyone with an AGENDA and a BIAS can start a media brand we NEED a TAX PAYER FUNDED news outlet that disseminates JUST THE FACTS.
JUST THE FACTS needs to be regulated. There can and should be NO bias on any side or from any angle. For anyone to deny that there currently exists no bias or agenda at NPR and PBS is not making the case for tax payer funds.
It all depends on where you're coming from - to a radical leftist or critical theorist, 99.99% of reality has a "right wing bias", and that's their problem.
Probably is, I don't care.Bogus, Media Bias Fact Check ranks them as left biased.They give the most even handed reporting of the news, with the least disrespect of the President, of any of the major news outlets. They have a left leaning slant in the issues they choose to cover, but I have never heard a single one of them foaming at the mouth about the President or Republicans, not even their guests.
You would be shooting the wrong folks here.
If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever. In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media.
"If you are going to have taxpayer-funded media, there should be NO slant. None whatsoever."
Agreed.
Just the facts.
even if the facts turn out to have a liberal bias
"In an era where anyone can start a media brand or disseminate media, I fail to see the benefit or need for taxpayers to fund media"
in an era with anyone with an AGENDA and a BIAS can start a media brand we NEED a TAX PAYER FUNDED news outlet that disseminates JUST THE FACTS.
JUST THE FACTS needs to be regulated. There can and should be NO bias on any side or from any angle. For anyone to deny that there currently exists no bias or agenda at NPR and PBS is not making the case for tax payer funds.
It all depends on where you're coming from - to a radical leftist or critical theorist, 99.99% of reality has a "right wing bias", and that's their problem.
"It all depends on where you're coming from - to a radical leftist or critical theorist, 99.99% of reality has a "right wing bias", and that's their problem."
and to a radical right winger 99.9%of reality has a LEFT WING bias.
THAT is their problem
Or do like most, just stop listening to the bullcrap as a personal choice, but if government is somehow holding them up after that, then government is wrong for that.Lately the Democratic party and "left" wing media has been used for the purposes of rabble rousing, inciting violence, and perpetuating misinformation to the uneducated Demographic.
This could give as a good case for repealing the First Amendment, or using the state's power to shut down Democratic media, including social media which incites violence and anarchy.
In practice, I don't think it would be too easy to do - the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
In practice, most of their "rights" are imaginary anyway, and are merely fed to them via their misinformation outlets by rabble rousers - simply shut them all down, and remind the Democratic party and it's mouth-breading demographic of their rightful place under the state's hierarchy.
As an example, anyone who uses the term "white supremacist", "Nazi", or "fascist" could be profiled by the FBI and the CIA, given that anarchist groups have abused this term. (Much as how actual white supremacy groups may be being monitored as well).
No. We should not shut them down.
As incorrigible as they may be, they have first amendment rights. Freedom of the Press.
They have the freedom to lie. You have the freedom to refute their lies.
Conservatives fought the Bill of Rights from day one. When they got into power with their second president, John Adams, They passed The Sedition Act that made it illegal to criticize the president or any conservative politician. When Jefferson was elected the liberals canceled the act. I wonder if Trump has tried to resurrect that Alien and Sedition law?Lately the Democratic party and "left" wing media has been used for the purposes of rabble rousing, inciting violence, and perpetuating misinformation to the uneducated Demographic.
This could give as a good case for repealing the First Amendment, or using the state's power to shut down Democratic media, including social media which incites violence and anarchy.
In practice, I don't think it would be too easy to do - the government could simply shut down TV and radio such as the Colbert Report, NPR, as well as social media outlets such as YouTube channels which incite violence, hatred, and immorality in the lowest common denominator.
In practice, most of their "rights" are imaginary anyway, and are merely fed to them via their misinformation outlets by rabble rousers - simply shut them all down, and remind the Democratic party and it's mouth-breading demographic of their rightful place under the state's hierarchy.
As an example, anyone who uses the term "white supremacist", "Nazi", or "fascist" could be profiled by the FBI and the CIA, given that anarchist groups have abused this term. (Much as how actual white supremacy groups may be being monitored as well).
I'll assume this is a joke since conservatives ASSURE me that they believe in FREE SPEECH and would NEVER silence anyone.
