Should Tulsi Gabbard Run as Independent in 2020?

[pknopp]

https://nypost.com/2019/10/15/democratic-debates-tulsi-gabbard-rips-hosts-cnn-new-york-times/
I think it would make things interesting...especially if she gets a former Republican to be her running mate. Perhaps former Senator Jeff Flake? Who would she take votes from if it was a unity ticket? Trump or Democratic nominee?

Nobody that is considering a real Republican would vote for a Socialist/RINO ticket.

When did "bailouts" become a cornerstone of "real Republicans"?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She is a Polynesian I believe. Yep...she looks good!

Actually, she's Indian...

Like Hindu Indian, not native American.

Well I would do some Dharma to her ... Karma Sutra here I come!

After that's over, you still have to talk and then you would realize that she is only slightly less retarded than the other libtards running.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

While it's enjoyable to see Tulsi spar at the debates, she's still a liberal. You want us to vote for a liberal?

No. But should she run as an independent if CNN, liberal media, and DNC establishment keep trying to silence her.

If they don't cover her then, as they don't now, how would she stand a chance?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

https://nypost.com/2019/10/15/democratic-debates-tulsi-gabbard-rips-hosts-cnn-new-york-times/
I think it would make things interesting...especially if she gets a former Republican to be her running mate. Perhaps former Senator Jeff Flake? Who would she take votes from if it was a unity ticket? Trump or Democratic nominee?

Nobody that is considering a real Republican would vote for a Socialist/RINO ticket.

He is thinking with another part of his anatomy.

 

[Harry Dresden]

She should go away and take her defeat in 2020 now that she's outed herself as a loon.

Served two tours of duty in Iraq. Recognizes that the media has a liberal establishment bias.

And that's all that is needed to be a viable presidential candidate according to the lunatic fringe.

She's not taking democratic votes now. So how is she going to hurt democrats by running as an independent? Tulsi is a joke. She is nice to look at, but there are millions of women in America who are nice to look at and they ain't running for president.

the real joke among the democrats is beto....

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She should go away and take her defeat in 2020 now that she's outed herself as a loon.

Yep. She's a one trick pony.

 

[Harry Dresden]

She should go away and take her defeat in 2020 now that she's outed herself as a loon.

Served two tours of duty in Iraq. Recognizes that the media has a liberal establishment bias.

And that's all that is needed to be a viable presidential candidate according to the lunatic fringe.

She's not taking democratic votes now. So how is she going to hurt democrats by running as an independent? Tulsi is a joke. She is nice to look at, but there are millions of women in America who are nice to look at and they ain't running for president.

Yes, once again we see how you shitheads can't tolerate anyone who disagrees with you.

you can say that about many righties too....

 

[IM2]

She should go away and take her defeat in 2020 now that she's outed herself as a loon.

Served two tours of duty in Iraq. Recognizes that the media has a liberal establishment bias.

And that's all that is needed to be a viable presidential candidate according to the lunatic fringe.

She's not taking democratic votes now. So how is she going to hurt democrats by running as an independent? Tulsi is a joke. She is nice to look at, but there are millions of women in America who are nice to look at and they ain't running for president.

the real joke among the democrats is beto....

No, it's Gabbard.

 

[grainbely]

She should go away and take her defeat in 2020 now that she's outed herself as a loon.

You think she would hurt the Democratic nominee?

She would hurt trump more, because there are a significant number of center right people that are it turns out not stupid and blind on trump and would prefer Tulsi to most of the others.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

She just might...Democrats march in lockstep and are not independent minded. Automatons.

That's not true at all. I'm center left and would prefer the huge fed govt plans be tabled or tested more. I want a more moderate dem who will just run the government well and stop the deficit inducing trickle down stupidity. One that will be professional and respectful even when the rabid conspiracy right are throwing their shit. One that will repair relationships and gain respect internationally and use american power for pushing peace, human rights, and environmental stewardship.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She should go away and take her defeat in 2020 now that she's outed herself as a loon.

You think she would hurt the Democratic nominee?

She would hurt trump more, because there are a significant number of center right people that are it turns out not stupid and blind on trump and would prefer Tulsi to most of the others.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

She just might...Democrats march in lockstep and are not independent minded. Automatons.

That's not true at all. I'm center left and would prefer the huge fed govt plans be tabled or tested more. I want a more moderate dem who will just run the government well and stop the deficit inducing trickle down stupidity. One that will be professional and respectful even when the rabid conspiracy right are throwing their shit. One that will repair relationships and gain respect internationally and use american power for pushing peace, human rights, and environmental stewardship.

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk

You are NOT center left. You are a libtard. That is all that matters.

 

[Issa]

https://nypost.com/2019/10/15/democratic-debates-tulsi-gabbard-rips-hosts-cnn-new-york-times/
I think it would make things interesting...especially if she gets a former Republican to be her running mate. Perhaps former Senator Jeff Flake? Who would she take votes from if it was a unity ticket? Trump or Democratic nominee?

Clinton and deep state knows better than you:

Former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton said Thursday the Russians are currently "grooming" a Democrat running in the presidential primary to run as a third-party candidate and champion their interests.
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/10/18/po...lsi-gabbard/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/

 

[JoeB131]

Said no sane person ever. I now fully understand why you are a Democrat.

Again, give me a list, with dollar amounts of what you are going to cut.

Then get back to me on "unnecessary spending".

 

[Lesh]

https://nypost.com/2019/10/15/democratic-debates-tulsi-gabbard-rips-hosts-cnn-new-york-times/
I think it would make things interesting...especially if she gets a former Republican to be her running mate. Perhaps former Senator Jeff Flake? Who would she take votes from if it was a unity ticket? Trump or Democratic nominee?

What you "think" is that it would help get Trump re-elected

 

[DBA]

Said no sane person ever. I now fully understand why you are a Democrat.

Again, give me a list, with dollar amounts of what you are going to cut.

Then get back to me on "unnecessary spending".

The first thing is the cut redundant government jobs, which Trump has already done. They routinely hire 1 guy to dig a ditch and another to fill the hole.

Heck, here is a link from the Huffiingtoon Post on government waste...it was the first article of many that came up oon a Google search.(go figure) I am not even going to bother to read the several articles as I am sure they are blaming in on Republicans, but the point is that peope on both side tend to agree that waste is a serious problem even if they don't always agree on exactly what should be considered waste. Giving the government more money will result in more waste and ineffeciency. By nearly all accounts, they are not nearly as efficient or productive as the private sector.

government waste

 

[JoeB131]

The first thing is the cut redundant government jobs, which Trump has already done. They routinely hire 1 guy to dig a ditch and another to fill the hole.

Heck, here is a link from the Huffiingtoon Post on government waste...it was the first article of many that came up oon a Google search.(go figure) I am not even going to bother to read the several articles as I am sure they are blaming in on Republicans, but the point is that peope on both side tend to agree that waste is a serious problem even if they don't always agree on exactly what should be considered waste. Giving the government more money will result in more waste and ineffeciency. By nearly all accounts, they are not nearly as efficient or productive as the private sector.

One more time buddy,

Tell me what you are going to cut, WITH NUMBERS.

We've been hearing the "Waste, Fraud and abuse" crap since the 1980's.. no one ever fixes that.

Yeah, Trump is totally cutting out waste by diverting that money into his own businesses...

 

[RealDave]

https://nypost.com/2019/10/15/democratic-debates-tulsi-gabbard-rips-hosts-cnn-new-york-times/
I think it would make things interesting...especially if she gets a former Republican to be her running mate. Perhaps former Senator Jeff Flake? Who would she take votes from if it was a unity ticket? Trump or Democratic nominee?

You wish.

 

[22lcidw]

Said no sane person ever. I now fully understand why you are a Democrat.

Again, give me a list, with dollar amounts of what you are going to cut.

Then get back to me on "unnecessary spending".

When a Prog is elected they go straight to the military budget. What can be cut must be broken down. Each program that is generalized must be separated into parts and be specific. Everything on the table. With decisions that can cause a little pain. During the 19080's there was a study that 30% of the federal budget of 1.2 trillion dollars was waste. To think that we can not cut waste from this budget today is a loser mentality. But there are man people sucking on that tit of waste.

 

[DBA]

The first thing is the cut redundant government jobs, which Trump has already done. They routinely hire 1 guy to dig a ditch and another to fill the hole.

Heck, here is a link from the Huffiingtoon Post on government waste...it was the first article of many that came up oon a Google search.(go figure) I am not even going to bother to read the several articles as I am sure they are blaming in on Republicans, but the point is that peope on both side tend to agree that waste is a serious problem even if they don't always agree on exactly what should be considered waste. Giving the government more money will result in more waste and ineffeciency. By nearly all accounts, they are not nearly as efficient or productive as the private sector.

One more time buddy,

Tell me what you are going to cut, WITH NUMBERS.

We've been hearing the "Waste, Fraud and abuse" crap since the 1980's.. no one ever fixes that.

Yeah, Trump is totally cutting out waste by diverting that money into his own businesses...

How about we take a private sector business approach. Cut x% across the board. That means everything is on the table. Once we take something off the table, the partisan debates start.

 

[Lesh]

Said no sane person ever. I now fully understand why you are a Democrat.

Again, give me a list, with dollar amounts of what you are going to cut.

Then get back to me on "unnecessary spending".

When a Prog is elected they go straight to the military budget. What can be cut must be broken down. Each program that is generalized must be separated into parts and be specific. Everything on the table. With decisions that can cause a little pain. During the 19080's there was a study that 30% of the federal budget of 1.2 trillion dollars was waste. To think that we can not cut waste from this budget today is a loser mentality. But there are man people sucking on that tit of waste.

Which study?

Post a link

 

[DBA]

Said no sane person ever. I now fully understand why you are a Democrat.

Again, give me a list, with dollar amounts of what you are going to cut.

Then get back to me on "unnecessary spending".

When a Prog is elected they go straight to the military budget. What can be cut must be broken down. Each program that is generalized must be separated into parts and be specific. Everything on the table. With decisions that can cause a little pain. During the 19080's there was a study that 30% of the federal budget of 1.2 trillion dollars was waste. To think that we can not cut waste from this budget today is a loser mentality. But there are man people sucking on that tit of waste.

Which study?

Post a link

It seems as though today's leftist are now on the "government doesn't waste money" train. This is exemplary of just how far out of touch with reality they have become.