Should There Be A Law...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by AVG-JOE, Mar 26, 2009.

?

Should PAYGO be a law?

  1. Yes.

    5 vote(s)
    83.3%
  2. No.

    1 vote(s)
    16.7%
  1. AVG-JOE
    Offline

    AVG-JOE American Mutt Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23,562
    Thanks Received:
    5,258
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Your Imagination
    Ratings:
    +7,943
    Should there be a law that forces government to provide a source of funds before it can enact new spending?

    PBS Frontline

    According to Frontline on PBS, the main reason Billary handed George II a surplus was a congressional rule called PAYGO

    Should it be a law that can't expire?

    -Joe
     
    Last edited: Mar 26, 2009
  2. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,776
    We elect these politicians because they are supposed to understand simple little math like this.

    Since they obviously cannot, I suppose we may as well have a law that protects us from their stupidity.

    But then, what does THAT say?
     
  3. AVG-JOE
    Offline

    AVG-JOE American Mutt Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23,562
    Thanks Received:
    5,258
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Your Imagination
    Ratings:
    +7,943
    It would protect us from politicians like Bush and the Congress who let the rule lapse so that he could pander to the senior citizens (who vote in force) with huge entitlements while he pandered to the wealthy (who finance campaigns) with huge tax cuts.

    I'll take a 'Tax and Spend' Democratic government over a 'Tax-Cut and Spend' Republican government any day, given only those two choices.

    -Joe
     
  4. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,776
    Possibly. It would definitely protect us against the likes of Obama who thinks as long as he has checks left in the checkbook he can still write them.
     
  5. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,426
    Thanks Received:
    5,595
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,630
    Wasn't that the idea behind PAYGO?

    And didn't BUSH II run the Iraqi war OFF the BOOKS to evade that?
     
  6. AVG-JOE
    Offline

    AVG-JOE American Mutt Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23,562
    Thanks Received:
    5,258
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Your Imagination
    Ratings:
    +7,943
    He didn't have to - the rule expired by 2003. Besides, according to the Frontline program thesis the war was very small potatoes compared to the tax cuts and the medicare / SSA entitlements.

    That piece by Frontline is an amazing look at Congress and the Bush II Administration.

    -Joe
     
  7. Meister
    Offline

    Meister Platinum Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2009
    Messages:
    25,979
    Thanks Received:
    8,114
    Trophy Points:
    493
    Location:
    Conservative part of the Northwest
    Ratings:
    +8,154
    Bush lost his conservative values (If he ever had them) when it came to spending. I don't think anyone will deny that. But does that mean the next person to become our president have a free pass on the check book?
    Democrats were complaining with all the spending Bush was doing when he was in office. Not just the spending on the war, either. Now they think it's the greatest thing since apple pie. I don't understand.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Xenophon
    Offline

    Xenophon Gone and forgotten

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2008
    Messages:
    16,705
    Thanks Received:
    3,743
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +3,748
    With this house, senate and Potus it should be carved in stone.
     
  9. AVG-JOE
    Offline

    AVG-JOE American Mutt Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2008
    Messages:
    23,562
    Thanks Received:
    5,258
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Your Imagination
    Ratings:
    +7,943
    In the humble opinion of this average Joe, that is exactly why all of Congress and the Republicans in particular deserve their current approval ratings.

    -Joe
     
  10. Jon
    Offline

    Jon The CPA

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    Messages:
    8,101
    Thanks Received:
    1,274
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Fayetteville, AR
    Ratings:
    +1,279
    Why Republicans in particular? The Democrats have ruled things for a while now, they're just as guilty as the Republicans at this point.
     

Share This Page