Should There Be A Better Vetting Process For Presidents Since Obama Has Failed

USArmyRetired

Rookie
May 29, 2010
2,601
360
0
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.
 
It's kind of funny.

Palins book "Going Rogue" got vetted by more people than obama did in his run for ofc.

The meer fact he was coming out of Chicago should have stopped him from making it.
 
After Bush Jr, anyone who criticizes Obama after two years is too drunk for comment.

"Today, just one year after leaving office, the former president has found himself in the bottom five at 39th rated especially poorly in handling the economy, communication, ability to compromise, foreign policy accomplishments and intelligence. Rounding out the bottom five are four presidents that have held that dubious distinction each time the survey has been conducted: Andrew Johnson, James Buchanan, Warren G. Harding, and Franklin Pierce." 238 presidential scholars: Bush worst president of modern era, fifth worst in US history | Raw Story

W. and the damage done - Global warming - Salon.com
 
Last edited:
Since the President has not failed the question is moot.

The real question should be "Have the pseudo-conservatives fooled enough Americans to return them to power?"
 
Guess we'll get an answer to that in Nov and again in 2012.

Should be very interesting.
 
Should there be a vetting process to serve in the US military? I think there should since you were allowed to serve proves the process isn't good enough.
 
Since the President has not failed the question is moot.

The real question should be "Have the pseudo-conservatives fooled enough Americans to return them to power?"
The president has failed. Look at his poll numbers and look at the economy. He was not fit for the job. He had no executive experience.
 
Since the President has not failed the question is moot.

The real question should be "Have the pseudo-conservatives fooled enough Americans to return them to power?"
The president has failed. Look at his poll numbers and look at the economy. He was not fit for the job. He had no executive experience.

How long should it have taken to fix the economy? Since he's failed you must have some expert knowledge of how long a competent leader would have fixed the economy from the way it was when he took office. Please enlighten us.
 
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress.

What failures? Everything seems to be socially working as expected.


Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.

Hmm, not allow citizens to vote for one candidate in the primary, and another in the general election. Take the authority to qualify candidates away from the states. Raise the qualifications for working for the government. Take away pardon power from the president. Make violations of oath a criminal act subject to no less than ten years in federal prison. :beer:
 
Look at all the failures he has had his first two years as a president supported by a democratic congress. Lets face it. The American people were duped by this guy who obviously wasn't properly vetted. How could a candidate promise so much and not deliver. What were his qualifications to make such promises and bring Hope & Change? Think about it folks. What kind of vetting process should we have for these candidates who want to bring prosperity for America and its citizens? Obama has proven that the vetting process doesn't work when selecting a president.

does the sound of the wind whistling through your head keep you awake at night?

asshat
 
Vetting, what vetting?

When you seal your academic records, have no military records or business experience then the media has quite simply dropped the ball and the public has lost total faith in the political process.
 
Bush Jr. slipped by with no qualifications whatsoever.

Prior to his election as President in 2000, Bush held numerous other positions, including oil executive, a Major League Baseball franchise owner, and Governor of Texas.

1996, Nov - Obama is elected to Illinois Senate,
2004, Nov - Obama is elected to US Senate

Bush; an employer, company owner and leader of the second largest state.
Obama; a lawyer, state senator, us senator

So who has more Know how on how lead?
 
Bush Jr. slipped by with no qualifications whatsoever.

Bush response has expired. Please check your dates for valid excuses.

Actually Bush is a valid reason to call for stringent government servants qualifications that would lead to greater US citizen protections from the evil empire. Like taking away pardon power from presidents and giving 10 year prison sentences for violating their oaths.
 
Bush Jr. slipped by with no qualifications whatsoever.

Prior to his election as President in 2000, Bush held numerous other positions, including oil executive, a Major League Baseball franchise owner, and Governor of Texas.

1996, Nov - Obama is elected to Illinois Senate,
2004, Nov - Obama is elected to US Senate

Bush; an employer, company owner and leader of the second largest state.
Obama; a lawyer, state senator, us senator

So who has more Know how on how lead?

Good show ol' boy! You have clarified what we suspected, that working for government should require a sobriety test and psychological exam, because work qualifications are not the answer..................:lol:
 
Since the President has not failed the question is moot.

The real question should be "Have the pseudo-conservatives fooled enough Americans to return them to power?"
The president has failed. Look at his poll numbers and look at the economy. He was not fit for the job. He had no executive experience.

You're to partisan to determine who is or who is not fit to be president. Poll numbers simply reflect opinion. The economy is better off than it was when President Obama took office.
 

Forum List

Back
Top