Should the sellers and manufacturers of Bump Stocks be sued?

Dunno if the makers of the bump stock should be sued, but I do think that modification kits for making semi auto weapons into full auto should be banned.

The ONLY purpose a machine gun has is to throw lots of lead downrange to kill and destroy people. You don't go hunting or target practicing with a machine gun.

Semi auto with bump stock is still semi auto.

lol, then what is its purpose?

Obviously, increased rate of fire. Still semi auto.

Too confusing for you?

A distinction without a difference. Looks like the NRA is finally feeling the heat and maybe, possibly and hopefully they will recognize that the policy of shall not infringe ever enables terrorists - domestic and foreign.

"Shall not infringe" still has the same meaning.

Bump stock technically is an accessory, and it doesn't necessary fall under protection of the 2nd.

LOL, one of the most thoughtless spins on this thread. Think about it, if you can, and you will (may) understand your distinction has no difference.

If cyanide is placed within a hollow point projectile is that only an accessory? Being a poison which kills slowly through though blood makes the kill more sure than if a artery or center mass hit fails to kill.
 
Last edited:
It's an LOL that the nuts think the above is somehow relevant.


It's sad that loons like you are so blinded by partisanship that you cannot hold your elites accountable for anything.

Your post has nothing to do with mine. Was that your intent?

Condolences on your lack of reading comprehension. I suggest you sign up for a Evelyn Woodhead Speed Reading course.



Are you begging me to say that Obama was wrong?

Obama WAS wrong, if he made the decision.

And YOU are wrong for agreeing with Obama. lolol

Obama was wrong almost in every decision he made, This one pales in comparison to the rest.



He does get 10 Points For Consisency!
 
Should the survivors and families of those murdered this weekend in Vegas have standing to sue the makers and sellers of Bump Stocks?

If not, why not?

Should Ford be sued for drunk drivers?

If not, why not?

Cars a legal.

25 + years ago companies once had Christmas Parties with open bars. Why do you think that is no longer the case.

In a word: MADD (their influence on the justice system).
There is revolving door between MADD and the NTSB and they constantly spew disinformation to the public. they are unproductive greedy pieces of shit.

Drain the swamp!
 
The battle for Fallujah lasted 47 days and was easily the bloodiest battle of the Iraq war. We lost 95 & had 560 wounded Americans in the Fallujah battle.

One crazy dude at a Vegas concert killed 59 & wounded 530 Americans in 10 minutes.
 
Should the survivors and families of those murdered this weekend in Vegas have standing to sue the makers and sellers of Bump Stocks?

If not, why not?
Unbelievable stupidity.

Should syringe makers be sued for overdose deaths?

Given the source, very believably stupidity. A syringe is regulated and sold only with prescriptions. They are made with a noble purpose, not so the bump stock.

Who decides what's noble, you?


Only WC can do that. He's all knowing.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top