- Feb 12, 2007
- 59,384
- 24,018
- 2,290
I keep hearing that we should bring government workers' compensation more in line with private workers. Never mind that it already is, but just for the sake of argument, if we are going to pay the public sector like the private sector, shouldn't we pay the President as much if not more than the CEO? After all, he's more important than any CEO! So let's pay the President $20 million a year.
Larry Ellison made $85 million in 2009, so $20 million is a bargain!
20 highest paid CEOs - Larry Ellison: $84.5 million (1) - CNNMoney.com
Larry Ellison is the Founder of Oracle, and most his his earning are from the gain on stock. He has helped create hundreds of thousands of jobs (if not more) via direct Oracle employees, the reseller network, and the need for employees to implement and manage Oracle product implementations.
So, unless you want to argue that the President OWNS the U.S. and deserves returns on his equity, try again.
BTW, Oracle's stock has been driven down quite deeply in the past, and Larry has lost more wealth in one year than the earnings you quote above.
EDIT: It's also important to note that Oracle is a highly profitable company, with Net Income AFTER TAX of over 22%. Compare that to The One running $T+ deficits. Larry wouldn't earn his level of income if Oracle ran at a 40% loss.
Last edited: