Discussion in 'Politics' started by blu, Jun 1, 2011.
seems logical to me
no. it's not. there are all kinds of reasons why people lose cases. being found not guilty does not mean that the person didn't commit the act. it doesn't even mean that the prosecution didn't have evidence. it only means that the jury found insufficient evidence for a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.
OJ was aquitted.
The problem would be that it would wind up like lawyer welfare.
If lawyers want a free ride from the govt they should get into politics.
It surely would cut down a lot of false prosecutions.
I disagree Jill. When a person brings an action against a suspected person, especially a case lacking probable cause and sufficient evidence for a conviction, and has to acquit the suspect, they/government should have to pay their legal fees and other related expenses including loss wages.
I think it should be a jury decision as well in the case. If aquittal then they decide if the govt pays the legal fees or how much of them.
Thats what lawsuits are for.
The laws are for false prosecutions?
BTW, who would you sue?
So you are saying that we should not have public defenders? So, only the rich walk free when accused of a crime?
Or are you reading this question in another light? My first thought was in regards to public defenders then I thought maybe he meant that the accused should get his legal fees paid if he is found to be innocent.
I'm thinking maybe my second interpretation of the question is correct and in that case, I am not sure that the government should not have to pay those legal fees. If I am falsely accused of a crime, why should I lose my life savings to pay legal fees just to prove my innocence?
I think that would lead to what it already has in civil cases, awarding unheard of amounts of money.
I also do not believe the government should have to pay if there is an acquittal. Prosecutors need to be held responsible, also something that is not done many times--due to the ineptitude in certain government institutions-- and they would be more cautious when bringing criminal charges. That, not monetary compensation, should to the determent.
But hey, what is the federal conviction rate? 95% conviction rate? (Federal conviction rate is amazingly high).
Separate names with a comma.