Should promoting gun control be illegal?

[bigrebnc1775]

Gun control pedagogues prey on the fear, naivete, and superstitious nature of the masses and the simple minded, pandering to the emotionally unrestrained and irrational as opposed to the calm, collected and rational crop of man and woman.

The reality, of course is that statistically, dying from natural causes or accidents, whether self-inflicted like obesity or smoking, or due to a car accident or death in a bathtub are far more likely and plausible.

The irrational and superstitious merely fear death from unlikely catastrophies, such as violence, which is quite a rare form of death in the modern world, due to their low IQs and heavy indulgence in media voyeurism and the stupidity and insipidity which it panders to, much as they superstitiously fear death from statistically improbable global warming alarmism and other escatological phenomenon which have been part of the fearful nature of the mouth breathing, the uncouth, the Neanderthal, the heathen, and the atheistic since the early days of man.

Per this, I'd postulate that preying on this naïve and unlikely fears via gun control advocacy should be state banned, with gun control activists designated as terrorists or terrorist organizations, insulting the rational by putting their own emotional hyberbole and irrational fear for themselves and their own children above reason, intellectualism, and its God.

No it should not.

The right to own a weapon doesn't supersede the Commerce Clause in the constitution nor does it supersede the First Amendment right to free speech.

What is your problem with freedom?

Shall not be infringed means what?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gun control pedagogues prey on the fear, naivete, and superstitious nature of the masses and the simple minded, pandering to the emotionally unrestrained and irrational as opposed to the calm, collected and rational crop of man and woman.

The reality, of course is that statistically, dying from natural causes or accidents, whether self-inflicted like obesity or smoking, or due to a car accident or death in a bathtub are far more likely and plausible.

The irrational and superstitious merely fear death from unlikely catastrophies, such as violence, which is quite a rare form of death in the modern world, due to their low IQs and heavy indulgence in media voyeurism and the stupidity and insipidity which it panders to, much as they superstitiously fear death from statistically improbable global warming alarmism and other escatological phenomenon which have been part of the fearful nature of the mouth breathing, the uncouth, the Neanderthal, the heathen, and the atheistic since the early days of man.

Per this, I'd postulate that preying on this naïve and unlikely fears via gun control advocacy should be state banned, with gun control activists designated as terrorists or terrorist organizations, insulting the rational by putting their own emotional hyberbole and irrational fear for themselves and their own children above reason, intellectualism, and its God.

You want to defend the Second Amendment by violating the First?

When you abuse a right shouldn't you lose it?

 

[Polishprince]

Gun control pedagogues prey on the fear, naivete, and superstitious nature of the masses and the simple minded, pandering to the emotionally unrestrained and irrational as opposed to the calm, collected and rational crop of man and woman.

The reality, of course is that statistically, dying from natural causes or accidents, whether self-inflicted like obesity or smoking, or due to a car accident or death in a bathtub are far more likely and plausible.

The irrational and superstitious merely fear death from unlikely catastrophies, such as violence, which is quite a rare form of death in the modern world, due to their low IQs and heavy indulgence in media voyeurism and the stupidity and insipidity which it panders to, much as they superstitiously fear death from statistically improbable global warming alarmism and other escatological phenomenon which have been part of the fearful nature of the mouth breathing, the uncouth, the Neanderthal, the heathen, and the atheistic since the early days of man.

Per this, I'd postulate that preying on this naïve and unlikely fears via gun control advocacy should be state banned, with gun control activists designated as terrorists or terrorist organizations, insulting the rational by putting their own emotional hyberbole and irrational fear for themselves and their own children above reason, intellectualism, and its God.

Here in Pennsylvania, our Constitution is pretty clear“The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.”


Questioning the people's God Given right to bear arms is unconstitutional.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Gun control pedagogues prey on the fear, naivete, and superstitious nature of the masses and the simple minded, pandering to the emotionally unrestrained and irrational as opposed to the calm, collected and rational crop of man and woman.

The reality, of course is that statistically, dying from natural causes or accidents, whether self-inflicted like obesity or smoking, or due to a car accident or death in a bathtub are far more likely and plausible.

The irrational and superstitious merely fear death from unlikely catastrophies, such as violence, which is quite a rare form of death in the modern world, due to their low IQs and heavy indulgence in media voyeurism and the stupidity and insipidity which it panders to, much as they superstitiously fear death from statistically improbable global warming alarmism and other escatological phenomenon which have been part of the fearful nature of the mouth breathing, the uncouth, the Neanderthal, the heathen, and the atheistic since the early days of man.

Per this, I'd postulate that preying on this naïve and unlikely fears via gun control advocacy should be state banned, with gun control activists designated as terrorists or terrorist organizations, insulting the rational by putting their own emotional hyberbole and irrational fear for themselves and their own children above reason, intellectualism, and its God.

Here in Pennsylvania, our Constitution is pretty clear“The right of the citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned.”


Questioning the people's God Given right to bear arms is unconstitutional.

What's going on with the states AG and his "rule" making 80% and other gun parts equal to a firearm?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

One of my local brothers voices his opinion on unconstitutional laws