Should Obama nominate a justice or not?

The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..
And the government is "regulating" you. So what's the problem?

Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...

Why does it matter what a bunch of guys said 200 years ago... They stated at the time that there views should not be taken forever...

I think if the founding fathers know that you are using their words to allow thousands to be killed each year...
Tissue??
 
The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..
And the government is "regulating" you. So what's the problem?

Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...
What part of "well-regulated" don't you understand?
 
It's the duty of the POTUS to appoint Justices to the SCOTUS. Republicans in the Senate might, and probably would, be seen as obstructing what is Constitutionally required for governance.

In an election year, that could hurt the GOP - which is already under threat in the Senate and the chance of a GOP POTUS - while still possibly resulting in a more liberal Justice being confirmed by a Democratic controlled Senate in 2017. It's a big gamble and one that most likely wouldn't turn out well for the GOP.
 
Obama will nominate someone to put the ball firmly in the Republicans court and start the clock ticking on Republican obstruction
 
It's the duty of the POTUS to appoint Justices to the SCOTUS. Republicans in the Senate might, and probably would, be seen as obstructing what is Constitutionally required for governance.

In an election year, that could hurt the GOP - which is already under threat in the Senate and the chance of a GOP POTUS - while still possibly resulting in a more liberal Justice being confirmed by a Democratic controlled Senate in 2017. It's a big gamble and one that most likely wouldn't turn out well for the GOP.

Our court is broken because YOUR Senator refuses to do his job
 
Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...

This nitwit, either because he's dumb or wants to come off as dumb, conveniently "forgets" the "well regulated" part of the 2nd amendment.
 
The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..
And the government is "regulating" you. So what's the problem?

Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...

Why does it matter what a bunch of guys said 200 years ago... They stated at the time that there views should not be taken forever...

I think if the founding fathers know that you are using their words to allow thousands to be killed each year...

Unlike you wanting to kill millions with Obama's policies?
 
Obama will nominate someone to put the ball firmly in the Republicans court and start the clock ticking on Republican obstruction
Dim wits want this for and election cycle point.. There will be no nominee vote until after the election.. The average SCOUTS process takes 1 year.. Unless your name is Bush and Democrats stall it for two years.
 
The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..
And the government is "regulating" you. So what's the problem?

Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...
What part of "well-regulated" don't you understand?
LOL.. Your having a hard time with the English language, aren't you.. Learn what punctuation means and how they are separated points. The founders did that ON PURPOSE! So ignorant fools could not mistake their meaning.. but you still succeeded in it..
 
For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..
And the government is "regulating" you. So what's the problem?

Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...
What part of "well-regulated" don't you understand?
LOL.. Your having a hard time with the English language, aren't you.. Learn what punctuation means and how they are separated points. The founders did that ON PURPOSE! So ignorant fools could not mistake their meaning.. but you still succeeded in it..
Punctuation does not eliminate the words, "well-regulated militia."
 
Hope that's easy enough for you, eh?

Though to be fair, you only need five, so it looks, as usual, to be a squeaker.


So, all that is needed is 5 democratic wins out of 28 contested seats.....and you have "serious doubts"??????

RIGHT WINGERS ARE A BIT DENSE THESE DAYS....

First of all, I don't what on Earth ever gave you the impression I am a "right winger."

Take off your partisan glasses.

Second, you were the one that conjured up for the board the mental image of "vivid blue."

5 more seats will give them a one seat majority (only with the yellow of independents,) hardly what I would call flipping the senate "vivid blue." Unless of course, you are on some pretty heavy drugs. . . .


IOW, that would mean, they might have control, but it would still be more red than blue. :badgrin:
 
COTUS is clear, POTUS nominates and the Senate advises and consents to the nomination.

President Obama will do his duty and nominate a replacement for Justice Saclia, and the Senate Republicans, even before said nomination, will begin to assassinate the character of the unknown person as liberal, and one who will allow abortion up to the birth, the confiscation of all firearms from our citizens and the suppression of voting by anyone who has not given their DNA to a government agent.

It's clear, Sen. Cruz said so and he never lies. In fact the Republican's will once again vote in lockstop to deny President Obama his choice, even if Jesus Christ himself appeared with The President in the Rose Garden as his nominee,.
Have you forgotten what the Ds did to Bork and Thomas?

Or was what they did to those two justices, fair and just in your mind?

Fair? Funny that would be a concern of yous. But I digress, see Bork and the Saturday Night Massacre. One could never consider him to be of open mind or non partisan.

Thomas, a token since he was nominated by a Republican (remember the BIG TENT lie) was qualified but not highly by the ABA, and was challenged for sexual harassment by a black women attorney, yet still confirmed by the Senate.

That said, if the President Obama nominates an individual with an impeccable record on the bench and in his or her personal life, and the Republican Senate assassinates his or her character based on "what if's" (see Cruz's comments from the most recent debate, as well as other comments by members of the clown car) we can once again point to the hypocrisy of the Republican's, and their propensity to put politics before their duty and the United States of America.
 
Obama is a pawn of the internationalists.


The elites want open borders, and they want America to have no guns. This is their big opportunity.


Obama will nominate someone that looks like a moderate, quacks like a moderate, and walks like a moderate.



America won't know that the SOB is for giving every illegal that is here the right to full citizenship and all but deleting the right to private gun ownership until after the person is already confirmed.


And the internationalist, CFR, UN loyal Republicans certainly won't bother to find out.

This game is set up to screw over Americans and destroy their rights. Who ever this person will be, is going to be confirmed and it will be the end of the Republic as we all know it. It will make a Trump candidacy irrelevant.
 
The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..

Wrong. The Militia are recruited by officers appointed by the state government and trained in concordance with the rules of the Congress.
 
The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL

So your historically challenged as well... WE THE PEOPLE are the militia.. An armed populace was the founding fathers answer to stopping would be kings and runaway government. But alas another left wing fool who is ignorant of history is spouting crap again..
And the government is "regulating" you. So what's the problem?

Are your reading impaired? What part of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" do you not understand? IT means NO, you cant touch this, its off limits to regulation or legislation...

Yet some arms are outlawed or regulated by states and or the Federal Government. Doubt thought, tell me where you can buy on the free market a fragmentation grenade or a Surface to Air Missile? .
 
Wrong. The Militia are recruited by officers appointed by the state government and trained in concordance with the rules of the Congress.


I sort of get the feeling that Billy-where-are-my-front-teeth-Bob would LOVE to join some militia outfit where he can fight against "kings" and "illegitimate governments" and take on any and all windmills that may appear on the horizon.
 
The right to KEEP AND BEAR ARMS, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED!


For all you "caps-challenged" right wingers who massage your guns for sexual gratification, the 2nd amendment actually states:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Which means that all you gun-toting charmers should sign up to join a militia and be "well regulated:.........LOL
I always look to history to decide these questions. If, after the Constitution was ratified, citizens were required to join a militia, you would have a point.

Matter of fact, the founders felt the entire male population was the militia.

Mark
 
Rejecting a SCOTUS nominee is not a "do nothing" senate. They ARE doing their jobs, according to the Constitution.

If Obama doesn't select a person worthy of passing the nomination process he is the one that is blockading the nomination.

The founders certainly didn't put the senate in the picture to become a rubber stamp method of the presidents choice.

Mark


Well, Mark....you got it all wrong......I agree that the senate has every constitutional right to reject even Jesus as Obama's nominee......BUT, I'm reacting to every GOP candidate and Sen. McConnell's "warning" for Obama to NOT even come up with a nominee.

nat,

Obama is going to nominate someone who is very qualified who is just left of center... This will cause a problem to the Senate... Refusals to confirm President's nomination hurts the GOP Senate... Despite what the jackasses here say, the senate need a good reason to not rubber stamp the Presidental nomination...

They have a good reason. All they have to state is that they want to keep the court balanced.

Mark
 

Forum List

Back
Top