Discussion in 'Clean Debate Zone' started by Vastator, Oct 6, 2017.
If you have a point, spit it out. I have no time for trolls.
Not a red herring- it is the reality you don't want to discuss.
You want a man to be either to:
a) control a woman's body or
b) be able to escape responsibility of the actions of placing his semen inside of a woman.
Don't have sex with women and you can absolutely prevent her from aborting your baby or from having to pay child support.
I think I know what Vastator is beating around the bush about. First he created this thread dishonestly, so I did a search and came up with this
So I know know where he stands. This should have been mentioned in the OP.
Back to topic
In order to remove responsibility for the man, the woman will need additional help. The reason the laws go after the man is cuz usually the man is in better financial condition and the Anti-Mom conservatives hate welfare. Back in the day, the man could support an entire faimly, now it really takes two.
Methinks this is really a thread about welfare
Am I right, Vastator?
There it is. See post # 13.
keep your dick in your pants
if you dont want to have an unwanted child
Not at all. It’s about seeing through to it’s logical conclusion true equality for men, and women under the law. Just like many have asked for.
Nothing dishonest about it. My personal stance is irrelevant. It’s about equal protection, and opportunity under the law.
If both men and women were to play by that rule....keep your privates in your pants.....if you don't want to have an unwanted child, there would be no need for abortions. Oh the irony!
4 pages and I don't see your logical conclusion
Where is it?
My personal stance is irrelevant.
We will see how your next few posts go, won't we?
Separate names with a comma.